In Vitro Establishment Procedures of Dog Rose (Rosa canina)

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2, 6 - 9, 31.08.2017

Mehdi Shirdel Ali Reza Motallebi-azar Mansour Matloobi , Sam Mokhtarzadeh Fethi Ahmet Özdemir

Öz

Dog rose (Rosa canina) is one of the medicinal plants with important role on vitamin C and active ingredients but a few researches has been conducted on the in vitro efficient establishment of this plant. Therefore, for optimization of establishment stage of R. canina, this study was carried out by 8 decontamination procedures included T1: 5% Sodium Hypochlorite, T2: 10% Povidone Iodine, T3: commercial Dettol, T4: commercial Banzalkonium Chloride, T5: Mercury (II) Chloride for 5 min, T6: Mercury (II) Chloride for 8 min, T7: 2.5% Sodium Hypochlorite with Cefotaxime and Tetracycline, T8: Mercury (II) Chloride for 2 min with Cefotaxime and Tetracycline. for elimination of bacteria and fungi contamination. In this study minimum browning percentage was observed in T7 and T8 (6 and 8% respectively), Bacterial contamination was completely controlled in T7 and T8, Fungi contamination percentage was completely controlled (100%) by T2, T3, T4, T6 and partially controlled by T8 and non-controlled by T7. Maximum bud break percentage was observed in T8, T7 and T2. The highest shoot length in T2 and T7 but the lowest shoot lengths were observed in T6. In T2, T3 and T7, node numbers were more than other decontamination treatments. T8 on the base of browning percentage, bacteria and fungi contamination percentage, bud break percentage was better than other procedures. T7 and T2 on the base of shoot length and node numbers were decontamination procedure better than other procedures. In this investigation decontamination procedures are considered as one the most important steps for successful implementation of biotechnological techniques for R. canina

Anahtar Kelimeler

Decontamination procedures bacterial contamination, fungi contamination, In vitro, Rosa canina

Kaynakça

• [1] IUCN. 2005. A guide to medicinal plants in North Africa. Center for Mediterranean cooperation, Malaga (Spain), pp: 256.
• [2] Sharafi Y. 2010. Biological characteristics of pollens in some genotypes of Rosa canina as main factors affecting fruit set. Afr. J. Med. Plants Res., 4: 2173-2175.
• [3] Khosh-Khui M, Sink KC. 1982. Micropropagation of new and old world rose species. J. Hortic. Sci., 57: 9-315.
• [4] Skirvin RM, Chu MC, Young HJ. 1990. Rose. In: Handbook of Plant Cell Culture, Ammirato P V., D R, Evans., W R, Sharp. and Bajaj Y P S (Eds.). New York: Mc- Graw Hill, New York: Springer, pp: 716-743.
• [5] Rout GR, Samantaray S, Mottley L, Das P. 1999. Biotechnology of the rose: A review of recent progress. Sci. Hortic., 81: 28-201.
• [6] Nikbakht A, Kafi M, Mirmasoudi M, Babalar M. 2005. Micropropagation of damask rose (rosa damascena mill.) cvs azaran and ghamsar. Int. J. Agri. Biol., 7: 535-538.
• [7] Senapati SK, Rout GR. 2008. Study of culture conditions for improved micropropagation of hybrid rose. Hort. Sci, (Prague), 35: 27-34.
• [8] Shirani S, Sariah M, Zakaria W, Maziah M. 2010. Scalp induction rate responses to cytokinins on proliferating shoot-tips of banana cultivars (Musa spp.). Am. J. Agric. Biol. Sci., 5:128-134.
• [9] Kumar AA, Sood UT, Gupta AK, Palni LMS. 2001. Micropropagation of rosa danmascena mill from mature bushes using thidiazuron. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol., 76: 4-30.
• [10] Singh SK, Syamal MM. 1990. Critical studies on the effect of growth regulators on in vivo shoot proliferation in Rosa hybrida L. CV Sonia for micropropagation. J. Appl. Hortic. Luckn., 1: 3-91.
• [11] Carelli BP, Echeverrigaray S. 2002. An improved system for the in vitro propagation of rose cultivars. Sci. Hortic., 92: 69-74.
• [12] Shirdel M, Motallebi-Azar A, Masiha S, Mortazavi N, Yavar MM. 2011. Effects of inorganic nitrogen source and NH4+: NO3- ratio on proliferation of dog rose (Rosa canina). J. Med. Plants Res., 5: 4605-4609.
• [13] Vandersalm TPM, Vandertoorn CJG, Hanisch CH, Dubois LAM, Devries DP et al., 1994. Importance of the iron chelate formula for micropropagation of Rosa hybrida L. Plant Cell. Tiss. Org. Cult., 37: 7-73.
• [14] Razavizadeh R, Ehsanpour AA. 2008. Optimization of in vitro propagation of Rosa hybrida L. cultivar Black Red. American-Eurasian. J. Agri. Environ. Sci., 3: 96-99.
• [15] Salehi H, Khosh-Khui M. 1997. Effects of explants length and diameter on in vitro shoot length and proliferation rate of miniature roses. J. Hortic. Sci., 72: 673-676.
• [16] Murashige T, Skoog F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant., 15: 97-473.