Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Long-Term Care for Older Adults: A Comparative Study Across Different Socio-Economic Groups

Year 2025, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 97 - 117, 30.12.2025
https://doi.org/10.51819/jaltc.2025.1742410

Abstract

This study aims to assess the attitudes of individuals from various societal segments toward long-term care (LTC) for older adults. Data were collected using the Personal Information Form and the Attitude Toward the Provision of Long-Term Care questionnaire. The results indicate that being female, being in the 50–64 age range, being married, having lower education levels, and perceiving their income as more than sufficient (“I can’t spend all”) are associated with more favorable attitudes toward family-based LTC. Additionally, living in the same household as an older adult, having prior caregiving experience, and having older adults previously co-residing with their children were associated with more positive attitudes toward family-based LTC. Conversely, having a relative living in a nursing home or care center, limited knowledge about aging and older adults care, and feeling inadequate in caregiving skills were linked to more favorable attitudes toward institutional-based LTC. Overall, the study highlights that attitudes toward LTC are shaped not only by the relationship between older adults and primary caregivers but also by broader family characteristics and socioeconomic conditions.

Ethical Statement

Ethics committee approval was received from Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa Social and Human Sciences Ethics Committee (Ethics committee no: 93/25 dated 18.05.2020). The study was conducted in compliance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Project Number

This work was supported by the TUBİTAK 2211-Domestic Graduate Scholarship Program.

References

  • Adak, N. (2003). Yaşlıların gayri resmi bakıcıları kadınlar. Aile ve Toplum, 2(6): 81-89.
  • Akçoban, S. (2020). Evaluation of caregivers' burden of the patients receiving home care health service [Master's thesis]. Çukurova University Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Adana.
  • Al Bcherraoui, M., Ajrouch, K. J., Abdulrahim, S., et al. (2025). Filial Closeness and Attitudes on Intergenerational Familial Care in Lebanon: Implications for Future Care Policy for Older Adults. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaf096
  • Alpteker, H. (2008). 65 Yaş ve Üstü Bireylere Evde Bakım Verenlerin Yasadıkları Güçlüklerin Belirlenmesi. [Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Bolu.
  • Beşpınar, F. U. (2014). Toplumsal Cinsiyet ve Aile, Türkiye Aile Yapısı Araştırması: Tespitler, Öneriler. İçinde M. Turğut, & S. Feyzioğlu (Eds.), Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı Aile ve Toplum Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Türkiye Aile Yapısı Araştırması: Tespitler, Öneriler. Çizge Tanıtım ve Kırtasiye Ltd. Şti.
  • Blau, P. (2017). Exchange and power in social life. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203792643
  • Bloom, D. E., Jimenez, E., & Rosenberg, L. (2012). Social Protection of Older People. Global Population Ageing: Peril Or Promise? İçinde World Economic Forum, 83-88.
  • Chinn, P. L. & Jacobs, M. K. (1987). Theory and Nursing: A Systematic Approach. Mosby Company.
  • Demirhan, G., & Altay, F. (2001). Attitude Scale of High School First Graders Towards Physical Education and Sporth. Hacettepe Journal of Sport Sciences, 12(2), 9-20.
  • Doğanay, G., & Güven, S. (2019). Women Assuming Care of the Elderly in the Family and Their Opinions: Example of Giresun Province in Turkey. Karadeniz Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(21), 343-357.
  • Duben, A. (2013). Generations of Istanbul families, the elderly, and the social economy of welfare. New Perspectives on Turkey, 48, 5-54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0896634600001874
  • Eryurt, M. A. (2014). Türkiye’de Yaşlı Nüfus ve Yaşlılık Dönemiyle İlgili Yaşam Tercihleri. İçinde M. Turğut, & S. Feyzioğlu (Eds.), Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı Aile ve Toplum Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Türkiye Aile Yapısı Araştırması: Tespitler, Öneriler. Çizge Tanıtım ve Kırtasiye Ltd. Şti.
  • Fernández-Carro, C. (2016). Ageing at home, co-residence or institutionalisation? Preferred care and residential arrangements of older adults in Spain. Ageing & Society, 36(3), 586-616. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X1400138X
  • Field, A. (2018). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. Sage Publications.
  • Ghasemi, A., & Zahediasl, S. (2012). Normality Tests for Statistical Analysis: A Guide for Non-Statisticians. International Journal of Endocrinology & Metabolism. (2):486- 489. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.3505
  • Goldstein, M., & Cynthia B. (1981). Modernization and Aging in the Third and Fourth World: Views from the Rural Hinterland in Nepal. Human Organization Dergisi, 40 (1): 48-55. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.40.1.u1412kkk6k0k5013
  • Gökdal, M. (2019). Yaşlı bakım alanında çalışan personelin yaşlılara yönelik tutumlarını etkileyen faktörlerin belirlenmesi: Ankara örneği. [Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. Ankara Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Gupta, R. (2007). The perceived caregiver burden scale for caregivers of elderly in India. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 26(2): 120-138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464806297685
  • Gürbüz, S., & Şahin, F. (2015). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Ho, R. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis with IBM SPSS (2nd ed.). CRC Press.
  • International Federation on Ageing. (2014). Connecting the dots: formal and informal care. Date of access: 17 May 2022, http://www.ifafiv.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Connecting-the-Dots-Formal-and-Informal-CareSenior-Government-Officials-Meeting-10th-June-2014.pdf
  • Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American journal of sociology, 63(6), 597-606. https://doi.org/10.1086/222355
  • Irmak, H. S. (2019). Elderly staying in the nursing home and their families' points of view about nursing homes (Master’s thesis). İstanbul University, Institute of Health Sciences.
  • Irmak, H. S., & Artan, T. (2021). Yaşlılara uzun süreli bakım sunulmasına yönelik Tutum Ölçeği’nin Türkçe uyarlaması: Geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalışması. Sosyal Çalışma Dergisi, 5(1), 11-17. https://doi.org/10.29023/alanyaakademik.807666
  • Kırışık, H. (2019). İnformal yaşlı bakımında kadın emeğinin toplumsal cinsiyet rolleri bağlamında değerlendirilmesi. [Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. Akdeniz Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Antalya.
  • Klein, W. C. (1992). Measuring caregiver attitude toward the provision of long-term care. Journal of Social Service Research, 16(3-4), 147-161. https://doi.org/10.1300/J079v16n03_08.
  • Kurtkapan, H. (2019). Gençlerin yaşlı bakımı sorumluluğuna ilişkin görüşleri üzerine sosyolojik bir araştırma. İçinde M. Talas (Ed.). Ailede Çocuk, Genç ve Yaşlılar Üzerine Araştırmalar. İksad Publishing.
  • Lin, W. (2019). The relationship between formal and informal care among Chinese older adults: based on the 2014 CLHLS dataset. BMC Health Services Research, 19, 323. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4160-8
  • Liu, H., Xu, L., Yang, H., et al. (2021). Preferences in long-term care models and related factors among older adults: a cross-sectional study from Shandong Province, China. European Journal of Ageing, 18, 89-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-020-00595-2
  • Lu, J., Zhang, L., & Zhang, K. (2021). Care Preferences Among Chinese Older Adults with Daily Care Needs: Individual and Community Factors. Research on Aging, 43(3-4), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027520939321
  • Luggen A. S., Travis, S. S., & Meiner, S. (Eds.). (1998). NGNA Core Currıcullum for Gerontological Advanced Practice Nurses (182-185). Sage Publications.
  • Ma, Q., Sun, F., & Mi, H. (2023). Long-Term Care Preferences Among Chinese Older Adults: The Role of Sociocultural Factors. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 35(6), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2023.2265770
  • Marnier, A. (1986). Nursing Theorists and Their Work. Mosby Company.
  • Martani, A., Brunner, A., & Wangmo, T. (2021). Intergenerational familial care: Shaping future care policies for older adults. Nursing Ethics, 28(5), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733020916748
  • OECD (2023). OECD Health Statistics 2023: Long-term care resources and utilisation. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/data/datasets/oecd-health-statistics/214497-Table-of-Content-Metadata-OECD-Health-Statistics-2023.pdf
  • Okuyan, C. B., & Karasu, F. (2020). Determination of elderly care personnel' attitudes towards the older persons: care problems and intervention suggestions. Health Sciences Journal of Adıyaman University, 6(1), 77-83. https://doi.org/10.30569/adiyamansaglik.673993
  • Özkurt, V. (2019). Risk of Caregivers’ Care Needs: The Magnet Effect of Care-receiver. Senex: Journal of Aging Studies, 3(3), 4-18. https://doi.org/10.24876/senex.2019.17
  • Sel, G. I. (2017). Dynamics of elderly-caregiving among different socio-economic groups in Ankara, Turkey. [Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Selen, F., & Kav, S. (2014). Determining the needs, caregiving burden and associated factors in primary caregivers of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases. Association for Research and Development in Nursing-HEMAR-G, 16(1), 12-22.
  • Suanet, B., Broese van Groenou, M., & van Tilburg, T. G. (2012). Informal and formal home-care use among older adults in Europe: can cross-national differences be explained by societal context and composition? Ageing & Society, 32(3), 491-515. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X11000390
  • TurkStat (2024). Address Based Population Registration System, 2024 TurkStat, Population Projections, 2030-2100. https://www.tuik.gov.tr/media/announcements/Eld_Stat2024.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
  • Turkish Statistical Institute (TÜİK). (2020). İstatistiklerle Yaşlılar 2020. Erişim Tarihi: 2 May 2022. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Istatistiklerle-Yaslilar-2020-37227.
  • Uçar Karcı, G., Yoldaşcan, B. E., & Okyay, R. A. (2018). Assessment of the Problems and Caregiver Burden of Family Individuals Who Care the Elderly. Kocaeli Med J., 7(3), 146-153. https://doi.org/10.5505/ktd.2018.93064
  • Uğur, Ö. (2006). Onkoloji Hastasına Evde Bakım Verenlerin Bakım Yükünün Belirlenmesi. [Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. Ege Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir.
  • Verbakel, E., Metzelthin, S. F., & Kempen, G. I. J. M. (2016). Caregiving to Older Adults: Determinants of Informal Caregivers' Subjective Well-being and Formal and Informal Support as Alleviating Conditions. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 71(6), 1099-1109. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbw047
  • Wee, S. L., Hu, A. J., Yong, J., et al. (2015). Singaporeans' Perceptions of and Attitudes Toward Long-Term Care Services. Qualitative Health Research, 25(2), 218-230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732314549812
  • WHO (2020). Decade of Healthy Ageing Besline Report. World Health Organization. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/338677/9789240017900-eng.pdf
  • Zarit, S. H., Reever, K. E., & Bach-Peterson, J. (1980). Relatives of the impaired elderly: correlates of feelings of burden. The Gerontologist, 20(6), 649-655. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/20.6.649
  • Zarit, S. H., Todd, P. A., & Zarit, J. M. (1987). Subjective burdens of husbands and wives as caregivers: a longitudinal study. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, 1(2), 109-110. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002093-198701020-00026
  • Zaybak, A., Güneş, Ü., İsmailoğlu, E. G., & Ülker, E. (2012). The Determination of Burden Care of Caregivers for Bedridden Patients. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences, 15(1), 1.
  • Zwar, L., & Hajek, A. (2025). It's all about the attitude: Findings on internalized caregiver stigma and mental health of informal caregivers. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaf111
There are 51 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Social Work (Other)
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Hatice Selin Irmak Yaşar 0000-0001-5032-1767

Taner Artan 0000-0002-8716-2090

Project Number This work was supported by the TUBİTAK 2211-Domestic Graduate Scholarship Program.
Submission Date July 14, 2025
Acceptance Date December 13, 2025
Publication Date December 30, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 8 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Irmak Yaşar, H. S., & Artan, T. (2025). Long-Term Care for Older Adults: A Comparative Study Across Different Socio-Economic Groups. Journal of Aging and Long-Term Care, 8(2), 97-117. https://doi.org/10.51819/jaltc.2025.1742410

For inquiries regarding JALTC and its publishing process, please contact the JALTC Secretariat at editor-in-chief@jaltc.net

Creative Commons License

This journal operates under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

The National Association of Social and Applied Gerontology (NASAG) is a leading non-profit organization in Türkiye, dedicated to promoting healthy aging through evidence-based research and policy development. NASAG emphasizes the integration of research, practice, and policy to improve the quality of life in later years.

The NASAG has been a member of the International Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics (IAGG) since 2007.