Community centers of local governments for retirees: The case of Istanbul

Abstract

The population of Turkey is aging. When local governments increase the quantity and quality of services for older people, the social welfare of older people increases as well. Among the special services for older people in the local administrations, community centers come first. This study examines the quality and diversity of services in community centers. In addition, the contribution of these centers to the activeness of older people living in the city is examined. In 2018, a cross-sectional survey was conducted in January and February, and a questionnaire was applied to 269 participants aged 55 years and older in the districts of Istanbul; Kadıköy, Maltepe, Üsküdar, Tuzla, Beşiktaş and Şişli. Research data were analyzed with the help of the SPSS 21 (2012) program. According to the results of the analysis, 42.7% of the participants were single individuals and15.1% of the participants were living alone at home. While 63.9% of the participants stated that they do sports, 70.3% of those who do sports said that this activity was “walking”. The most of the participants (44.2%) stated that they participated in the social activities of these centers. As the reason for the participants' using the community center, 68% of the participants chose the option of meeting with their friends, 52% chose to have new friendships, 48.3% of them chose the option of eliminating their loneliness. The 65-74 age group who use the community center are doing more regular sports than the ones aged 75 and over χ2 = 6.851, p 3.30e-02. Women who use the community center do more regular sports than men χ2 = 11.423; p 1.00e-03. It could be said that the community centers are important alternative public spaces in the city, especially for older people living alone.

Key Practitioners Message

• Community centers of local governments could contribute to the activity of older people.
• It is important to make regular sports for the older person.
• Regular physical activity may vary according to gender.
  

Keywords

• Active Aging,Community Center,Urbanization,Social Policy,Local Administrations

References

1. Achenbaum, W. A., Weiland, S. & Haber, C. (1996). Key Words in Sociocultural Gerontology. New York: Springer Pub.
2. Aydıner Boylu, A. (2013). Proceeding from VII. National aging congress. [VII. Ulusal yaşlılık kongresi]: Active aging and lifelong learning [Aktif yaslanma ve yasam boyu ogrenme]. Ankara: TDV Yayınevi
3. Baran E. & Bahar-Özvarış, Ş. (2012). Improving the old age health [Yaslilik doneminde sagligin geliştirilme si]. In Aslan D. & Ertem M. (Eds.) Elderly health [Yaşlı sagligi]. Ankara: Palme Yayincilik.
4. Cockerham, W. C. (1991). This aging society. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall.
5. Dal Santo, T. S. (2009). Senior center literature review: Reflecting & respond- ing to community needs. Retrieved. http://www.ncoa.org/assets/fles/pdf/Litera ture_ Review_of_Senior_Centers.pdf
6. EYH, General Directorate of Services for Persons with Disabilities and Elderly People [Engelli ve Yaşlı Hizmetleri Genel Mudurlugu]. (2013). The status of the elderly in Turkey and the implementation program for national action plan [Türkiye’de yaslilarin durumu ve yaslanma ulusal eylem plani uygulama programi]. Ankara: Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanligi Yayinları
7. Fitzpatrick, S., Reddy, S., Lommel, T., Fischer, J., Speer, E., Stephens, H., Park, S. & Johnson, M. (2008). Physical activity and physical function improved following a community-based intervention in older adults in Georgia senior centers. Journal of Nutrition for the Elderly, 27(1), 135. J Nutr Elder. 2008; 27(1-2):135- 54.
8. Görgün Baran, A. (2012). Family and aging [Aile ve Yaşlanma]. In Kasapoğlu, A. & Karkıner, N., (Eds.) Sociology of Family [Aile Sosyolojisi] (pp. 135-165) Eskisehir: Anadolu Universitesi Acik Ogretim Yayinlari.

9. Görgün Baran, A. & Kurnaz, Z. (2013). Proceeding from VII. National aging congress. [VII. Ulusal yaşlılık kongresi]: Active aging and perception of aging [Aktif yaslanma ve yaslilik Algisi]. Karabük, Ankara: TDV Yayınevi
10. IBM Corp. (2012). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp (Released 2016).
11. Kalınkara, V. (2013). Proceeding from VII. National aging congress. [VII. Ulusal yaşlılık kongresi]: Aging management: the role of learning in aging societies. [Yaşlılık yönetimi: Yaşlanmakta olan toplumlarda öğrenmenin rolü]. Ankara: TDV Yayinevi.
12. Kumbetoglu, B. (2005). Qualitative method and research in sociology and anthropology [Sosyolojide ve antropolojide niteliksel yontem ve arastirma]. Istanbul: Baglam Yayincilik
13. Kurtkapan, H. (2018). Aging in the city and local government practices [Kentte Yaslilik ve Yerel Yonetim Uygulamalari]. Ankara: Nobel Yayincilik.
14. Moody, H., R. & Sasser, J., R. (2012). Aging: Concepts and controversies, 7th ed. Los Angeles: Sage.
15. Powell, J. L. (2006). Social theory and aging. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefeld Publishers.
16. Şentürk, M. & Altan, R. B. (2015). Introduction, current situation survey of older people in Istanbul [Giris, Istanbul’da yaslilarin mevcut durumu arastirmasi]. In Şentürk, M. & Ceylan, H., (Eds) Aging in Istanbul, the current situation of the older people in Istanbul [Istanbul’da yaslanmak, Istanbul’da yaslilarin mevcut durumu arastirmasi]. (pp. 13-35.) Istanbul: Acilim Kitap.
17. Toepoel, V. (2013). Ageing, leisure, and social connectedness: How could leisure help reduce social isolation of older people?, Social Indicator Research, 113(1), 355- 372.
18. TURKSAT (Turkish Statistical Institute), (2016). The results of address-based population registration system, 2015. [Adrese dayalı nufus kayıt sistemi sonuclari, 2015 haber bulteni] Retrieved form: http:// www.tuik. gov.tr/PreHaber Bultenleri: 18618.
19. Turner, B. S., & Tatlıcan, Ü. (2011). Medical power and social information [Tıbbi güc ve toplumsal bilgi]. İstanbul: Sentez Yayincilik.
20. UN DESA (Department of Economic and Social Affairs) (2015). World population ageing, 2015, Retrieved from: http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/ population/publications/pdf/ageing/WPA2015_Report.pdf.
21. Victor, C., R. (2005). The social context of ageing. New York: Routledge.
22. Weeks, J., R. (1984). Aging, concepts and social issues. Belmont, Ca: Wadsworth.
23. Yalçın, Y. (2013). An evaluation of the role of media in active and healthy aging information [Aktif ve saglikli yaslanmada medyanin rolu uzerine bir degerlendirme]. VII. Ulusal Yaslilik Kongre Bildiri Kitabı, Ankara: TDV Yayinevi.
24. Zunzunegui, M. V., Alvarado, B., E., Teodoro, D., and Otero, A. (2003). Social networks, social integration, and social engagement determine cognitive decline in community-dwelling Spanish older adults. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 58B(2), 93-100.