Research Article

Fused deposition modeling (FDM) process parameter optimization for PLA component manufacturing

Volume: 7 Number: 1 July 1, 2026
EN

Fused deposition modeling (FDM) process parameter optimization for PLA component manufacturing

Abstract

Technological developments in manufacturing have significantly improved living standards in recent years. These advancements are largely driven by progress in material science and the development of manufacturing techniques that enable cost-effective mass production. Additive manufacturing (AM) is a production method that creates objects by adding material layer by layer based on three-dimensional model data. In this process, a physical product is generated directly from a 3D Computer-Aided Design (CAD) model. The main objective of additive manufacturing technologies is to produce components with minimal cost, high quality, and optimal efficiency. In this study, the effects of process parameters on the strength, filament consumption, and printing time of PLA (polylactic acid) parts produced by fused deposition modeling (FDM) were investigated. The produced parts were ‘Clip Control Fixtures’ used to check the presence of clips on wire harness bundles manufactured at YAZAKI. Wall line count (WLC), infill density (ID), and print speed (PS) were selected as process parameters. Experiments were conducted using the Taguchi L9 experimental design with three levels for each factor. According to the analysis performed under the “larger is better” assumption, WLC had the greatest effect on strength (56.21%), followed by ID (33.49%). The optimal parameter combination for maximum strength was determined as WLC 6, ID 90, and PS 40. For filament consumption (“smaller is better”), ID showed the highest influence (95.68%). For printing time, PS (71.53%) and ID (27.71%) were the most influential factors, and the optimal combination was WLC 2, ID 20, PS 120.

Keywords

References

  1. [1] Mazlan, M.A., Anas, M.A., Nor Izmin, N.A., & Abdullah, A.H. (2023). Effects of Infill Density, Wall Perimeter and Layer Height in Fabricating 3D Printing Products. Materials, 16(2), Article 695. [CrossRef]
  2. [2] Lee, C.-Y., & Liu, C.-Y. (2019). The influence of forced-air cooling on a 3D printed PLA part manufactured by fused filament fabrication. Additive Manufacturing, 25, 196203.
  3. [3] Yu, Z., Gao, Y., Jiang, J., Gu, H., Lv, S., Ni, H., Wang X., & Jia C. (2019). Study on Effects of FDM 3D Printing Parameters on Mechanical Properties of Polylactic Acid. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 688, Article 033026. [CrossRef]
  4. [4] Kartal, F. (2017). Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters by Taguchi methodology. International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry, 1(1), 4956. [Turkish]
  5. [5] Cho, E.E., Hein, H.H., Lynn, Z., Hla, S.J., & Tran, T. (2019). Investigation on influence of infill pattern and layer thickness on mechanical strength of PLA material in 3D printing technology. Journal of Engineering and Science Research, 3(2), 27–37. [CrossRef]
  6. [6] Kamer, M.S., Temiz, S., Yaykasli, H., Kaya, A., & Akay, O.E. (2022). Effect of printing speed on FDM 3D-printed PLA samples produced using different two printers. International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry, 6(3), 438448.
  7. [7] Eryıldız, M. (2021). Effect of build orientation on mechanical behavior and build time of FDM 3D-printed PLA parts: an experimental investigation. European Mechanical Science, 5(3), 116120. [CrossRef]

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Optimization Techniques in Mechanical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering (Other), Optimization in Manufacturing

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

July 1, 2026

Submission Date

March 10, 2026

Acceptance Date

April 7, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 7 Number: 1

APA
Mustafa, S., Murat, D., Uğuz, A., & Çakır, M. C. (2026). Fused deposition modeling (FDM) process parameter optimization for PLA component manufacturing. Journal of Advances in Manufacturing Engineering, 7(1), 21-30. https://izlik.org/JA92AC84LM
AMA
1.Mustafa S, Murat D, Uğuz A, Çakır M C. Fused deposition modeling (FDM) process parameter optimization for PLA component manufacturing. J Adv Manuf Eng. 2026;7(1):21-30. https://izlik.org/JA92AC84LM
Chicago
Mustafa, Serhat, Dilek Murat, Agah Uğuz, and Mustafa Cemal Çakır. 2026. “Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Process Parameter Optimization for PLA Component Manufacturing”. Journal of Advances in Manufacturing Engineering 7 (1): 21-30. https://izlik.org/JA92AC84LM.
EndNote
Mustafa S, Murat D, Uğuz A, Çakır M C (July 1, 2026) Fused deposition modeling (FDM) process parameter optimization for PLA component manufacturing. Journal of Advances in Manufacturing Engineering 7 1 21–30.
IEEE
[1]S. Mustafa, D. Murat, A. Uğuz, and M. C. Çakır, “Fused deposition modeling (FDM) process parameter optimization for PLA component manufacturing”, J Adv Manuf Eng, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 21–30, July 2026, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA92AC84LM
ISNAD
Mustafa, Serhat - Murat, Dilek - Uğuz, Agah - Çakır, Mustafa Cemal. “Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Process Parameter Optimization for PLA Component Manufacturing”. Journal of Advances in Manufacturing Engineering 7/1 (July 1, 2026): 21-30. https://izlik.org/JA92AC84LM.
JAMA
1.Mustafa S, Murat D, Uğuz A, Çakır M C. Fused deposition modeling (FDM) process parameter optimization for PLA component manufacturing. J Adv Manuf Eng. 2026;7:21–30.
MLA
Mustafa, Serhat, et al. “Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Process Parameter Optimization for PLA Component Manufacturing”. Journal of Advances in Manufacturing Engineering, vol. 7, no. 1, July 2026, pp. 21-30, https://izlik.org/JA92AC84LM.
Vancouver
1.Serhat Mustafa, Dilek Murat, Agah Uğuz, Mustafa Cemal Çakır. Fused deposition modeling (FDM) process parameter optimization for PLA component manufacturing. J Adv Manuf Eng [Internet]. 2026 Jul. 1;7(1):21-30. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA92AC84LM