Research Article

Effects of Proline Applications on Plant Growth and Enzyme Activities in Forage Pea (Pisum sativum ssp. arvense L.) under Different Water Limit Conditions

Volume: 6 Number: 1 March 26, 2025
EN

Effects of Proline Applications on Plant Growth and Enzyme Activities in Forage Pea (Pisum sativum ssp. arvense L.) under Different Water Limit Conditions

Abstract

This study was conducted in 2024 in the greenhouses of Atatürk University plant production center in order to determine the effects of proline applications during the seedling period on plant development and some physiological and biochemical properties in forage pea grown under drought stress. The research was conducted in the form of a pot experiment with 3 irrigation levels [full irrigation (%100) (d0), 70% of field capacity (d1) and 40% of field capacity (d2)] and four proline applications (0, 5, 10, 20 mM) in 3 replications according to the completely randomized design. At the end of the experimental period, plant development parameters and some physiological and biochemical measurements and analyses were made in forage pea plants and the differences between the applications were evaluated. According to the research findings, significant differences emerged between the applications and levels. The effect of proline applications on plant development (plant height, stem diameter, fresh, dry weight, etc.) and some plant physiological and biochemical parameters [tissue electrical conductivity (mp), tissue relative water content (rwc), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), malondialdehyde (mda), proline] was significant. At the end of the study, it was determined that drought conditions negatively affected plant development and decreased rwc and stomatal conductance. However, proline application improved plant development in forage pea under drought conditions and decreased rwc content compared to the control. As a result; it can be said that proline application affected the plant more positively in non-drought conditions.

Keywords

Drought , Forage pea , Proline , Stress

References

  1. Ahmad, H. M., Fiaz, S., Hafeez, S., Zahra, S., Shah, A.N., Gul, B., Aziz, O., Rahman, M. U., Fakhar, A., Rafique, M., Chen, Y., Yang, S. H., & Wang, X. (2022). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria eliminate the effect of drought stress in plants: A review. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 875774. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.875774
  2. Anjum, S. A., Farooq, M., Xie, X. Y., Liu, X. J., & Ijaz, M. F. (2012). Antioxidant defense system and proline accumulation enables hot pepper to perform better under drought. Scientia Horticulturae, 140, 66-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2012.03.028
  3. Bayhan, M., Özkan, R., Albayrak, Ö., Akıncı, C., & Yıldırım, M. (2022). Bazı arpa (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotipleri ile f1 melezlerinin kontrollü koşullarda değerlendirilmesi. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 6(3), 563-572. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018060
  4. Bhaduri, A. M., & Fulekar, M. H. (2012). Antioxidant enzyme responses of plants to heavy metal stress. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio-Technology, 11, 55-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-011-9251-x
  5. Bloem, J., De Ruiter, P. C., Koopman, G. J., Lebbink, G., & Brussaard, L. (1992). Microbial numbers and activity in dried and rewetted arable soil under integrated and conventional management. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 24(7), 655-665. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(92)90044-X
  6. Blum, A., & Jordan, W. R. (1985). Breeding crop varieties for stress environments. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 2(3), 199-238. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352688509382196
  7. Butt, M., Ayyub, C. M., Amjad, M., & Ahmad, R. (2016). Proline application enhances growth of chilli by improving physiological and biochemical attributes under salt stress. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 53(1), 43-49. https://doi.org/10.21162/PAKJAS/16.4623
  8. Çamoğlu, G. (2013). The effects of water stress on evapotranspiration and leaf temperatures of two olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivars. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture, 100(1), 91-98. https://doi.org/10.13080/z-a.2013.100.012
  9. Capell, T., Bassie, L., & Christou, P. (2004). Modulation of the polyamine biosynthetic pathway in transgenic rice confers tolerance to drought stress. PNAS, 101(26), 9909-9914. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0306974101
  10. Erdoğan Bayram, S. (2018). Su stresi ve bitkilerde su stresine bağlı fizyolojik değişimler. Tralleis Elektronik Dergisi, 3(2), 219-228. (In Turkish)
APA
Zeren Dursun, E., & Dumlu Gül, Z. (2025). Effects of Proline Applications on Plant Growth and Enzyme Activities in Forage Pea (Pisum sativum ssp. arvense L.) under Different Water Limit Conditions. Journal of Agricultural Production, 6(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.56430/japro.1624951