Analysis of University Students’ Awareness towards Renewable Energy: The Case of Atatürk University

Year 2025, Volume: 6 Issue: 4, 282 - 289, 30.12.2025

Okan Demir , Gizem Çağlar Gültekin

https://doi.org/10.56430/japro.1773048

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the awareness levels of renewable energy among students at Atatürk University and identify factors influencing this awareness. The research involved a face-to-face survey conducted in 2023 with 320 university students selected through random sampling. The survey utilized a 5-point Likert-type renewable energy awareness scale developed by Morgil. Additionally, socio-demographic data such as age, gender, parents’ education levels, and whether students had received education in renewable energy or related courses were collected. An ordered probit model was developed based on the collected data, and the model was found to be statistically significant. Results indicated that gender, mother’s education level, and receiving energy-related education significantly affected renewable energy awareness. Specifically, female students demonstrated higher awareness levels compared to males, and taking energy courses positively influenced awareness. Conversely, age and father’s education level were not found to have a significant impact on awareness. Literature supports the finding that mother’s education plays a more decisive role in shaping children’s environmental awareness. The findings suggest that strengthening environmental and energy education within university curricula, developing targeted programs to reduce gender-based awareness disparities, and organizing educational activities aimed at raising environmental consciousness among families are crucial. Implementing these strategies is expected to enhance renewable energy awareness and contribute to the development of a sustainable society.

Keywords

Atatürk University , Awareness , Ordered probit model , Renewable energy

Ethical Statement

This study was approved in advance by Faculty of Agriculture Ethics Committee of Atatürk University with the decision number 2025/1 on 16.09.2025.

Thanks

We would like to express my sincere gratitude to all the participants who took the time to complete the survey and share their valuable insights. Their contributions were essential to the completion of this study.

References

• Akbay, C., Tiryaki, G. Y., & Gül, A. (2007). Consumer characteristics influencing fast food consumption in Turkey. Food Control, 18(8), 904-913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2006.05.007
• Barr, S., Gilg, A. W., & Shaw, G. (2011). ‘Helping people make better choices’: Exploring the behaviour change agenda for environmental sustainability. Applied Geography, 31(2), 712-720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.12.003
• Barth, M., Godemann, J., Rieckmann, M., & Stoltenberg, U. (2012). Developing key competencies for sustainable development in higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 8(4), 416-430. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370710823582
• Bozoğlu, M., Bilgic, A., Topuz, B. K., & Ardali, Y. (2016). Factors affecting the students’ environmental awareness, attitudes and behaviors in Ondokuz Mayıs University, Turkey. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 25(4), 1243-1257.
• Bozoğlu, M., Topuz Kilic, B., Baser, U., Shahbaz, P., & Eroğlu, N. A. (2022). Graduate students’ knowledge levels on climate change in the departments of agricultural economics in Turkey. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 24(5), 1029-1041.
• Chen, K. Z., Ali, M., Veeman, M. M., Unterschultz, J., & Le, T. (2002). Relative importance rankings for pork attributes by Asian-origin consumers in California: Applying an ordered probit model to a choice-based sample. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 34(1), 67-79. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.15515
• Collins, L. M., Murphy, S. A., & Bierman, K. L. (2007). A conceptual framework for adaptive preventive interventions. Prevention Science, 5(3), 185-196. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:prev.0000037641.26017.00
• Davidson, R., & MacKinnon, J. G. (2003). Econometric theory and methods. Oxford University Press.
• Fielding, K. S., & Head, B. W. (2012). Determinants of young Australians’ environmental actions: The role of responsibility attributions, locus of control, knowledge and attitudes. Environmental Education Research, 18(2), 171-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.592936
• Franzen, A., & Vogl, D. (2013). Two decades of measuring environmental attitudes: A comparative analysis of 33 countries. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1001-1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.03.009
• Gifford, R. (2011). The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. American Psychologist, 66(4), 290-302. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023566
• Greene, W. H. (2008). Econometric analysis. Pearson Prentice-Hall.
• Greene, W. H. (2012). Econometric analysis. Pearson Prentice-Hall.
• Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
• McKelvey, R. D., & Zavoina, W. A. (1975). Statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 4(1), 103-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.1975.9989847
• Mertoğlu, Ç. (2019). Üniversite öğrencilerinin yenilenebilir enerji kaynakları konusundaki farkındalık düzeylerinin belirlenmesi (Master’s thesis, Ondokuz Mayıs University). (In Turkish)
• Morgil, İ., Secken, N., Yucel, A. S., Öskay, Ö. Ö., Yavuz, S., & Ural, E. (2006). Developing a renewable energy awareness scale for pre-service chemistry teachers. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 7(1), 63-74.
• Oral, M. (2020). Yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklarına ilişkin bir farkındalık araştırması. Türkiye Bilimsel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 5(2), 387-397.
• Owens, S., & Driffill, L. (2008). How to change attitudes and behaviours in the context of energy. Energy Policy, 36(12), 4412-4418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.031
• Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behavior: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
• Tiftikçi, H. İ. (2014). Farklı bölümlerde öğrenim görmekte olan son sınıf üniversite öğrencilerinin yenilenebilir enerji kaynakları hakkındaki farkındalıkları (Master’s thesis, Gazi University). (In Turkish)
• Van Liere, K. D., & Dunlap, R. E. (1980). The social bases of environmental concern: A review of hypotheses, explanations and empirical evidence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44(2), 181-197.
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press.
• Yılmaz, Ş., & Türkyılmaz, O. (2022). Dünya’da ve Türkiye’de birincil enerji arzı. In MMO/731 (Eds.), Türkiye’nin enerji görünümü (pp. 5-19). TMMOB Makina Mühendisleri Odası Raporu. (In Turkish)
• Zelezny, L. C., Chua, P. P., & Aldrich, C. (2000). Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 443-457. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00177