The Effects of Water Quality Parameters on Summer Dynamics of Phytoplankton and Zooplankton in the Tributaries of Murat River (Hınıs, Erzurum)

Year 2025, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 41 - 52, 26.03.2025

Emirhan Ögrü , Sinan Uzundumlu , Özden Fakıoğlu

https://doi.org/10.56430/japro.1622366

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the spatial variations in phytoplankton and zooplankton composition in relation to selected water quality parameters across five tributaries of the Murat River. The research encompassed physical and chemical parameters, chlorophyll-a levels, zooplankton and phytoplankton composition and biodiversity indices within the tributaries. A total of seven zooplankton species were identified, comprising 40% Copepoda, 37.14% Cladocera and 22.86% Rotifera, with Cyclops vicinis emerging as the dominant species. Additionally, 34 species from the Bacillariophyta, Chlorophyta and Cyanobacteria groups were recorded. The Shannon-Wiener and Margalef Biodiversity Indices revealed that zooplankton diversity peaked at the 5th station, while phytoplankton diversity was highest at the 3rd station. The average concentrations of total phosphorus (TP) and ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) were measured as 5.93 mg L-1 and 3.02 mg L-1, respectively. Chlorophyll-a values ranged from 0.001 mg L-1 at the 1st station to 0.011 mg L-1 at the 5th station. According to the Trophic Diatom Index (TDI), the water quality was categorized as poor, while other indices indicated medium water quality. In conclusion, the findings highlight that the tributaries of the Murat River are under significant threat from anthropogenic pollution. Urgent mitigation measures are recommended to safeguard these water resources.

Keywords

Biodiversity, Plankton, Stream, Water quality

Supporting Institution

TÜBİTAK

Project Number

1919B012302951

Thanks

This research was supported by TÜBİTAK-BİDEB 2209/A (Grant No: 1919B012302951).

References

• Anonymous. (2003a). Su Çerçeve Direktifi’nin Türkiye’de uygulanması uygulama el kitabı. Grantmij Advies and Techniek bv Vestiging Utrect, Houten.
• Anonymous. (2003b). Water quality-guidance standard for the routine analysis of phytoplankton abundance and composition using inverted microscopy (Utermöhl technique). CEN TC 230/WG 2/TG 3/N73.
• APHA. (1995). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (19th edition). American Public Health Association.
• APHA. (2001). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (20th edition). American Public Health Association.
• Bakır, N. (2015). Su çerçeve direktifine göre biyolojik kalite unsuru: Makrofit (Speciality Thesis, Turkish Republic Ministry of Forestry and Water Affairs). (In Turkish)
• Bērziņš, B., & Pejler, B. (1987). Rotifer occurrence in relation to pH. In L. May, R. Wallace & A. Herzig (Eds.), Rotifer Symposium IV. Developments in Hydrobiology (pp. 107-116). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4059-8_16
• Borutskii, E. V. (1964). Fauna of U.S.S.R. Vol. 3, 4, crustacea: Freshwater Harpacticoida. Jerusalem: Israel Program for Scientific Translations.
• Bulut, H., & Saler, S. (2014). Murat Nehri’nin (Elazığ-Palu ilçe merkezi sınırları içindeki bölümün’de) zooplanktonu ve değişimi. Türk Tarım – Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 2(1), 13-17. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v2i1.13-17.32 (In Turkish)
• Bulut, H., & Saler, S. (2019). Effect of physicochemical parameters on zooplankton at a freshwater body of Euphrates Basin (Elazığ-Turkey). Cellular and Molecular Biology, 65(1), 8-13. https://doi.org/10.14715/cmb/2019.65.1.2
• Coste, M., & Ayphassorho, H. (1991). Étude de la qualité des eaux du Bassin Artois-Picardie à l'aide des communautés de diatomées benthiques : Application des indices diatomiques. Rapport, 227. (In French)
• Cox, E. J. (1991). What is the basis for using diatoms as monitors of river quality? In B. A. Whitton, E. Rott & G. Fredrich (Eds.), Use of algae for monitoring rivers (pp. 33-40). Universitat Innsbruck Institut für Botanik.
• Cox, E. J. (1996). Identification of freshwater diatoms from live material. Chapman and Hall.
• Descy, J. P., & Coste, M. (1991). A test of methods for assessing water quality based on diatoms. Verhandlungen des Internationalen Verein Limnologie, 24(4), 2112-2116. https://doi.org/10.1080/03680770.1989.11899905
• Dussart, H. B., & Defaye, D. (2001). Introduction to the Copepoda. In H. J. F. Dumont (Ed.), Guides to the identification of the microinvertebrates of the continental waters of the world (pp. 1-344). SPB Academic Publishers.
• Edmondson, W. T. (1959). Fresh water biology. University of Washington.
• Einsle, U. (1996). Copepoda: Cyclopoida, genera cyclops, megacyclops, acanthocyclops. In H. J. F. Dumont (Ed.), Guides to the identification of the microinvertebrates of the continental waters of the world (pp. 1-82). SPB Academic Publishers.
• Flössner, D. (1972). Krebstiere, crustacea. Kiemen and Blattfüßer Brachiopoda fischlause, Branchiura, tierwelt-deutschlands. 60. Tiel Veb. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena. (In German)
• Herzig, A. (1987). The analysis of planktonic rotifer population: A plea for long-term investigations. Hydrobiologia, 147, 163-180. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00025739
• Hill, M. O. (1973). Diversity and evenness: A unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology, 54(2), 427-432.
• James, B. K., & Adejare, L. I. (2010). Nutrients and phytoplankton production dynamics of a tropical harbor in relation to water quality indices. Journal of American Science, 6(9), 261-275.
• John, D. M., Whitton, B. A., & Brook, A. J. (2002). The freshwater algal flora of the British Isles. Cambridge University Press.
• Kelly, M. G., & Whitton, B. A. (1995). The trophic diatom index: A new index for monitoring eutrophication in rivers. Journal of Applied Phycology, 7, 433-444. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00003802
• Kelly, M. G. (1998). Use of the trophic diatom index to monitor eutrophication in rivers. Water Research, 32(1), 236-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00157-7
• Kelly, M., Juggins, S., Guthrie, R., Pritchard, S., Jamieson, J., Rippey, B., Hırst, H., & Yallop, M. (2008). Assessment of ecological status in UK rivers using diatoms. Freshwater Biology, 53(2), 403-422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01903.x
• Kerkmann, G. R., Hatunoğlu, A., & Hatunoğlu, Y. (2012). Preliminary data regarding anthropogenic impact on the Murat River (Ağri region). International Journal of Ecosystems & Ecology Sciences, 2(2), 55-60.
• Kıvrak, E., Uygun, A., & Kalyoncu, H. (2012). Akarçay'ın (Afyonkarahisar, Türkiye) su kalitesini değerlendirmek için diyatome indekslerinin kullanılması. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 12(2), 27-38. (In Turkish)
• Kiefer, F., & Fryer, G. (1978). Das Zooplankton der Binnengewässer. 2. Teil, E. Schweizerbart‘sche Verlagsbuchhandlung. (In German)
• Kirici, M., Kirici, M., Demir, Y., Beydemir, S., & Atamanalp, M. (2016). The effects of Al3+ and Hg2+ on glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase from Capoeta umbla kidney. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 14(2), 253-264. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1402_253264
• Kolisko, W. R. (1974). Planktonic rotifers biology and taxonomy biological station. Lunz of The Austrian Academy of Science.
• Koste, W. (1978a). Die Rädertiere Mitteleuropas I. Textband.
• Koste, W. (1978b). Die Rädertiere Mitteleuropas II. Tofelband.
• Koyun, M. (2011). Occurrence of monogeneans on some cyprinid fishes from Murat River in Turkey. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10(79), 18285-18293. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB11.2507
• Koyun, M., Ulupınar, M., Özdemir, N. S., Kırıcı, M., & Caf, F. (2020). Seasonal changes of water quality of Murat River (Bingol, Turkey) in terms of physicochemical and biological parameters. Acta Aquatica Turcica, 16(3), 305-312. https://doi.org/10.22392/actaquatr.626918
• Krebs, C. J. (1998). Ecological methodology. Benjamin/Cummings.
• Kwak, T. J., & Peterson, J. T. (2007). Community indices, parameters, and comparisons. In C. S. Guy & M. L. Brown (Eds.), Analysis and interpretation of freshwater fisheries data (pp. 677-763). American Fisheries Society.
• Leclercq, L., & Maquet, B. (1987). Deux nouveaux indices chimiques et diatomiques de qualité d’eau courante, application au Samson et ses affluents (bassin de la Meuse belge), comparaison avec d’autres indices chimiques biocénotiques et diatomiques. Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Document de Travail. (In French)
• Lecointe, C., Coste, M., & Prygiel, J. (1993). Omnidia: Software for taxonomy, calculation of diatom indices and inventories management. Hydrobiologia, 269(1), 509-513. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00028048
• Lenoir, A., & Coste, M. (1996). Development of a practical diatom index of overall water quality applicable to the French national water board network. In B. A. Whittonand & E. Rott (Eds.), Use of algae for monitoring rivers II (pp. 29-43). Universitat Innsbruck Institut für Botanik.
• Liao, A., Han, D., Song, X., & Yang, S. (2021). Impacts of storm events on chlorophyll-a variations and controlling factors for algal bloom in a river receiving reclaimed water. Journal of Environmental Management, 297, 113376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113376
• Mikschi, E. (1989). Rotifer distributions in relation to temperature and oxygen content. Hydrobiology, 186, 209-214. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00048914
• Moss, B. (2007). The art and science of lake restoration. Hydrobiologia, 581, 15-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0524-2
• Negrea, S. T. (1983). Fauna republici socialiste Romania, crustacea Cladocera. Academia Republici Socialiste. (In Romanian)
• Ongun Sevindik, T., Çetin, T., Tunca, H., Güzel, U., & Tekbaba, A. G. (2023). Ecological status estimation of minimally disturbed rivers of the Western Mediterranean Basin (Türkiye) using diatom indices. Community Ecology, 24, 243-255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42974-023-00147-5
• Pulatsü, S., Topçu, A., & Atay, D. (2014). Su kirlenmesi ve kontrolü. Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi. (In Turkish)
• Salinas-Camarillo, V. H., Carmona-Jiménez, J., & Lobo, E. A. (2021). Development of the Diatom Ecological Quality Index (DEQI) for peri-urban mountain streams in the Basin of Mexico. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 14555-14575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11604-3
• Scourfield, D. J., & Harding, J. P. (1969). Fresh-water biology. As Sci Publications.
• Segers, H. (1995). Rotifera 2. The Lecanidae (Monogononta). In H. J. Dumont & T. Nogrady (Eds.), Guides to the identification of the continental waters of the world 6 (pp. 226). SPB Academic.
• Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379-423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
• Steinberg, C., & Schiefele, S. (1988). Biological indication of trophy and pollution of running waters. Z. WasserAbwasser-Forsch, 21, 227-234.
• Stemberger, R. S. (1979). A guide to rotifers of the Laurentian great lakes. Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory Office of Research and Development.
• Strickland, J. D. H., & Parsons, T. R. (1972). A practical handbook of seawater analysis. Bulletin 167.
• T.C. Başbakanlık Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı. (1998). Ulusal çevre eylem planı. Deniz kaynakları yönetimi ve kirlilik kontrolü. TC. Başbakanlık Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı. (In Turkish)
• Tanyolaç, J. (2009). Limnoloji. Hatipoğlu Yayınları. (In Turkish)
• Topal, M., & Topal, E. I. A. (2016). Murat Nehri (Elazığ)’nin bazı fizikokimyasal parametreler açısından su kalitesinin belirlenmesi. International Symposium of Water and Wastewater Management. Malatya.
• Ustaoğlu, M. R. (2004). A check-list for zooplankton of Turkish inland waters. Ege University Journal of Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences, 21(3-4), 191-199.
• Ustaoğlu, M. R., Altındağ, A., Kaya, M., Akbulut, N., Bozkurt, A., Özdemir Mis, D., Atasağun, S., Erdoğan, S., Bekleyen, A., Saler, S., & Okgerman, H. C. (2012). A check list of Turkish rotifers. Turk Journal of Zoology, 36(5), 607-622. https://doi.org/10.3906/zoo-1110-1
• Utermöhl, H. (1958). Zur Vervolkommnung deer quantitativen Phytoplankton-Methodik. Mitteilungen der Internationale Vereinigung der theoretretische und Angewandte. Limnologie, 9, 39. (In German)
• Van Dam, H., Mertens, A., & Sinkeldam, J. (1994). A coded checklist and ecological indicator values of freshwater diatoms from the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Aquatic Ecology, 28, 117-133. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02334251
• YSKY. (2015). Yüzeysel su kalitesi yönetimi yönetmeliği. https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2015/04/20150415-18.htm (In Turkish)