Quality-Oriented AI: A Socio-Technical Governance Framework for Higher Education
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly transforming higher education governance, quality assurance, teaching, research, and societal engagement; however, its implications for institutional quality, academic values, and sustainable quality culture remain insufficiently theorized. This study examines AI in higher education through a governance-sensitive and quality-oriented analytical framework and introduces the concept of quality-oriented AI, defined as AI systems designed and governed to support reflective governance, evidence-informed decision-making, ethical accountability, and sustainable quality enhancement. A qualitative exploratory research design was employed, drawing on purposefully selected academic and policy-oriented materials, including higher education quality assurance frameworks, institutional strategic plans, AI roadmaps, academic literature, and selected institutional narratives. Through an inductive thematic analysis, the study examined how AI is conceptualized across four institutional domains: leadership, governance, and quality assurance; education and teaching; research and knowledge production; and societal engagement. The findings show that AI reconfigures quality processes in domain-specific ways. In leadership, governance, and quality assurance, AI supports strategic foresight, continuous monitoring, institutional coordination, and accountability, while also raising concerns about technocratic governance and metric-driven oversight. In education and teaching, AI enables learning analytics, early intervention, curriculum alignment, and pedagogical responsiveness, but creates tensions related to pedagogical autonomy, equity, and the relational dimensions of learning. In research and knowledge production, AI strengthens research mapping, performance analysis, and strategic research governance, while reshaping epistemic priorities and definitions of academic excellence. In societal engagement, AI enhances the visibility and assessment of public value, yet may reinforce narrow, metric-driven interpretations of social impact. The study contributes by conceptualizing quality-oriented AI as a socio-technical governance framework, demonstrating differentiated AI–quality interactions across institutional domains, and identifying the governance conditions required for responsible AI integration in higher education. The results indicate that AI contributes to higher education quality not through technological sophistication alone, but through governance design, transparency, ethical oversight, human judgment, stakeholder participation, bias assessment, contextual interpretation, and alignment with academic values.
Keywords
References
- Akulova B, Tashtobaeva B, Vassilev T, Koshoeva B (2025). Development of an information system for accreditation and assessment in education. In 2025 International Conference on Automatics and Informatics (ICAI) (pp. 822–826).
- Alfaleh M (2026). Sustainable AI-driven assessment in higher education: A systematic review of fairness, transparency, pedagogical innovation, and governance. Sustainability, 18(2).
- Alsadi J, Alkhatib F, Antony J, Garza-Reyes JA, Tortorella G, Cudney EA (2024). A systematic literature review with bibliometric analysis of Quality 4.0. The TQM Journal, 37(5), 1446–1470.
- Arsalan MH, Mubin O, Mahmud AA, Khan IA, Hassan AJ (2025). Mapping data-driven research impact science: The role of machine learning and artificial intelligence. Metrics, 2(2).
- Arya V, Saraf A, Chichkanov N, Papa A, Romano M (2025). AI-enhanced competency transfer hubs: A conceptual framework for university-industry engagement and knowledge sharing. The Journal of Technology Transfer.
- Bhat J (2023). Automating higher education administrative processes with AI-powered workflows. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Computer Science and Information Technology, 4(4), 147–157.
- Borsatto JMLS, Marcolin CB, Abdalla EC, Amaral FD (2024). Aligning community outreach initiatives with SDGs in a higher education institution with artificial intelligence. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 12, Article 100160.
- Boumediene H, Bouakkaz M (2025). Artificial intelligence in education: Emerging trends, ethical considerations, and future directions. In Next-generation AI methodologies in education (pp. 407–438). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Quality Assurance in Higher Education
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Publication Date
June 30, 2026
Submission Date
April 15, 2026
Acceptance Date
June 8, 2026
Published in Issue
Year 2026 Volume: 01 Number: 01
APA
Çanga, E. (2026). Quality-Oriented AI: A Socio-Technical Governance Framework for Higher Education. Journal of Accreditation and Quality Assurance in Higher Education, 01(01), 53-86. https://izlik.org/JA25MB54HF
AMA
1.Çanga E. Quality-Oriented AI: A Socio-Technical Governance Framework for Higher Education. JAQAHE. 2026;01(01):53-86. https://izlik.org/JA25MB54HF
Chicago
Çanga, Eren. 2026. “Quality-Oriented AI: A Socio-Technical Governance Framework for Higher Education”. Journal of Accreditation and Quality Assurance in Higher Education 01 (01): 53-86. https://izlik.org/JA25MB54HF.
EndNote
Çanga E (June 1, 2026) Quality-Oriented AI: A Socio-Technical Governance Framework for Higher Education. Journal of Accreditation and Quality Assurance in Higher Education 01 01 53–86.
IEEE
[1]E. Çanga, “Quality-Oriented AI: A Socio-Technical Governance Framework for Higher Education”, JAQAHE, vol. 01, no. 01, pp. 53–86, June 2026, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA25MB54HF
ISNAD
Çanga, Eren. “Quality-Oriented AI: A Socio-Technical Governance Framework for Higher Education”. Journal of Accreditation and Quality Assurance in Higher Education 01/01 (June 1, 2026): 53-86. https://izlik.org/JA25MB54HF.
JAMA
1.Çanga E. Quality-Oriented AI: A Socio-Technical Governance Framework for Higher Education. JAQAHE. 2026;01:53–86.
MLA
Çanga, Eren. “Quality-Oriented AI: A Socio-Technical Governance Framework for Higher Education”. Journal of Accreditation and Quality Assurance in Higher Education, vol. 01, no. 01, June 2026, pp. 53-86, https://izlik.org/JA25MB54HF.
Vancouver
1.Eren Çanga. Quality-Oriented AI: A Socio-Technical Governance Framework for Higher Education. JAQAHE [Internet]. 2026 Jun. 1;01(01):53-86. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA25MB54HF