Research Article

Forecasting Turkey’s Air Cargo Tonnage: A Comparative Analysis of Statistical Techniques and Machine Learning Methods

Volume: 9 Number: 1 February 26, 2025
EN

Forecasting Turkey’s Air Cargo Tonnage: A Comparative Analysis of Statistical Techniques and Machine Learning Methods

Abstract

With the expanding global economy, the demand for air logistics continues to grow, further emphasizing its significance. However, this increased demand also presents a barrier to the growth of the air transportation sector, which is marked by a high degree of vulnerability. This study aims to forecast cargo volumes in the air logistics sector, which holds considerable growth potential. To achieve this, two statistical models (SARIMA and ARIMAX) and three machine learning methods (Gradient Boosting Regression Tree, Random Forest, and Support Vector Regression) were utilized in a comparative analysis, and forecasts for air cargo volumes were generated using the model with the best performance. The findings reveal that machine learning-based models outperform statistical models when applied to time series data. Specifically, the Random Forest model demonstrated superior performance in forecasting 1-10 month periods, while the Gradient Boosting Regressor (GBR) outperformed other models in 5-month periods. Additionally, the SARIMA model was found to be highly competitive for short-term forecasts. Based on these results, it was determined that the Random Forest model provides higher accuracy for 1-10 month periods, whereas the GBR model excels in 5-month periods. The results further indicate that dynamic modelling strategies achieved through machine learning methods yield more accurate predictions compared to statistical models.

Keywords

References

  1. Adetunji, A. B., Akande, O. N., Ajala, F. A., Oyewo, O., Akande, Y. F., & Oluwadara, G. (2022). House price prediction using random forest machine learning technique. Procedia Computer Science, 199, 806-813.
  2. Anggraeni, W., et al. (2017). The performance of ARIMAX model and Vector Autoregressive (VAR) model in forecasting strategic commodity price in Indonesia. Procedia Computer Science, 124, 189-196.
  3. Bakırcı, M. (2013). Ulaşım Coğrafyası Açısından Türkiye’de Havayolu Ulaşımının Tarihsel Gelişimi ve Yapısı [The Historical Development and Structure of Air Transportation in Turkey from the Perspective of Transport Geography]. Marmara Coğrafya Dergisi, (27). URL:https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/marucog/issue/472/3869
  4. Bierens, H. J. (1987). ARMAX model specification testing, with an application to unemployment in the Netherlands. Journal of Econometrics, 35(1), 161-190.
  5. Bowerman, B. L., & O’Connell, R. T. (1993). Forecasting and time series: An applied approach (3rd ed.). Duxbury Press.
  6. Box, G. E. P., & Jenkins, G. M. (1970). Time series analysis: Forecasting and control. Holden-Day.
  7. Bozkurt, H. Y. (2013). Zaman serileri analizi [Time series analysis]. Ekin Yayınevi.
  8. Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5–32.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Air Transportation and Freight Services

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

February 24, 2025

Publication Date

February 26, 2025

Submission Date

November 11, 2024

Acceptance Date

December 23, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 9 Number: 1

APA
Çatuk, C. (2025). Forecasting Turkey’s Air Cargo Tonnage: A Comparative Analysis of Statistical Techniques and Machine Learning Methods. Journal of Aviation, 9(1), 109-117. https://doi.org/10.30518/jav.1582814
AMA
1.Çatuk C. Forecasting Turkey’s Air Cargo Tonnage: A Comparative Analysis of Statistical Techniques and Machine Learning Methods. JAV. 2025;9(1):109-117. doi:10.30518/jav.1582814
Chicago
Çatuk, Cüneyt. 2025. “Forecasting Turkey’s Air Cargo Tonnage: A Comparative Analysis of Statistical Techniques and Machine Learning Methods”. Journal of Aviation 9 (1): 109-17. https://doi.org/10.30518/jav.1582814.
EndNote
Çatuk C (February 1, 2025) Forecasting Turkey’s Air Cargo Tonnage: A Comparative Analysis of Statistical Techniques and Machine Learning Methods. Journal of Aviation 9 1 109–117.
IEEE
[1]C. Çatuk, “Forecasting Turkey’s Air Cargo Tonnage: A Comparative Analysis of Statistical Techniques and Machine Learning Methods”, JAV, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 109–117, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.30518/jav.1582814.
ISNAD
Çatuk, Cüneyt. “Forecasting Turkey’s Air Cargo Tonnage: A Comparative Analysis of Statistical Techniques and Machine Learning Methods”. Journal of Aviation 9/1 (February 1, 2025): 109-117. https://doi.org/10.30518/jav.1582814.
JAMA
1.Çatuk C. Forecasting Turkey’s Air Cargo Tonnage: A Comparative Analysis of Statistical Techniques and Machine Learning Methods. JAV. 2025;9:109–117.
MLA
Çatuk, Cüneyt. “Forecasting Turkey’s Air Cargo Tonnage: A Comparative Analysis of Statistical Techniques and Machine Learning Methods”. Journal of Aviation, vol. 9, no. 1, Feb. 2025, pp. 109-17, doi:10.30518/jav.1582814.
Vancouver
1.Cüneyt Çatuk. Forecasting Turkey’s Air Cargo Tonnage: A Comparative Analysis of Statistical Techniques and Machine Learning Methods. JAV. 2025 Feb. 1;9(1):109-17. doi:10.30518/jav.1582814

Cited By

Journal of Aviation - JAV 


www.javsci.com - editor@javsci.com


9210This journal is licenced under a Creative Commons Attiribution-NonCommerical 4.0 İnternational Licence