Research Article

Evaluation of Flow Models According to Aerodynamic Characteristics of NACA 4412 Airfoil

Volume: 10 Number: 2 June 27, 2026

Evaluation of Flow Models According to Aerodynamic Characteristics of NACA 4412 Airfoil

Abstract

This study investigates the aerodynamic characteristics of the NACA 4412 airfoil using the finite element method under different flow models. A three-dimensional wing section with NACA 4412 geometry was modelled, and the flow was simulated using four commonly employed models: k-omega shear stress transport, k-epsilon, laminar, and inviscid. For each flow model, the angle of attack was varied over a fine range covering prestall, stall, and poststall conditions, and the corresponding lift and drag coefficients were obtained and plotted. The sensitivity and accuracy of the flow models in simulating the behavior of asymmetric airfoils were compared to the expected behavior derived from Navier–Stokes, Euler, and related viscous and nonviscous flow formulations. Particular emphasis was placed on predicting flow separation, resolving the boundary layer close to the airfoil surface, and estimating viscous drag. The results show that the k-omega shear stress transport model most accurately captures the onset of stall, the maximum lift level, and the development of flow separation around the NACA 4412 profile. The k-epsilon model provides acceptable results in fully turbulent regions but predicts stall at higher angles of attack and is less precise near the boundary layer. The laminar and inviscid models fail to reproduce a clear stall region and underestimate drag 23 because the turbulence and viscous losses are not represented adequately. Although the turbulence models require higher computational effort than laminar and inviscid approaches, their superior performance in predicting lift, drag, and stall behavior supports the use of advanced turbulence modelling for reliable aerodynamic analysis and design of airfoils similar to NACA 4412.

Keywords

References

  1. Aljuhaishi. S. Y. K. Al-Timimi. and B. I. Wahab. 2024. Comparing Turbulence Models for CFD Simulation of UAV Flight in a Wind Tunnel Experiments: Comparing turbulence models. Period. Polytech. Transp. Eng. 52 (3): 301– 309.
  2. Anderson Jr. J. D. 1991. Fundamentals of Aerodynamics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  3. Constantin. P. and C. Foiaş. 1988. Navier-stokes equations. University of Chicago press.
  4. Daróczy. L. G. Janiga. K. Petrasch. M. Webner. and D. Thévenin. 2 180 015. Comparative analysis of turbulence models for the aerodynamic simulation of H-Darrieus rotors. Energy. 90: 680–690.
  5. Dervieux. A. 2013. Numerical simulation of compressible Euler flows: a GAMM workshop. Springer Science & Business Media.
  6. Elnahhas. A. and P. L. Johnson. 2022. On the enhancement of boundary layer skin friction by turbulence: an angular momentum approach. J. Fluid Mech. 940: A36.
  7. Farassat. F. 1986. The Ffowcs Williams-Hawkings Equation—Fifteen Years of Research. Aero and Hydro- Acoustics IUTAM Symp. Ec. Cent. Lyon. 3--6 July. 1985. 175–180.
  8. Garcia-Villalba. M. T. Colonius. O. Desjardins. D. Lucas. A. Mani. D. Marchisio. O. K. Matar. F. Picano. and S. Zaleski. 2025. Numerical methods for multiphase flows. Int. J. Multiph. Flow. 191. 105285.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Aerospace Engineering (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

June 14, 2026

Publication Date

June 27, 2026

Submission Date

March 16, 2026

Acceptance Date

May 29, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 10 Number: 2

APA
Ortamevzi, G. (2026). Evaluation of Flow Models According to Aerodynamic Characteristics of NACA 4412 Airfoil. Journal of Aviation, 10(2), 342-346. https://doi.org/10.30518/jav.1911107
AMA
1.Ortamevzi G. Evaluation of Flow Models According to Aerodynamic Characteristics of NACA 4412 Airfoil. JAV. 2026;10(2):342-346. doi:10.30518/jav.1911107
Chicago
Ortamevzi, Gürkan. 2026. “Evaluation of Flow Models According to Aerodynamic Characteristics of NACA 4412 Airfoil”. Journal of Aviation 10 (2): 342-46. https://doi.org/10.30518/jav.1911107.
EndNote
Ortamevzi G (June 1, 2026) Evaluation of Flow Models According to Aerodynamic Characteristics of NACA 4412 Airfoil. Journal of Aviation 10 2 342–346.
IEEE
[1]G. Ortamevzi, “Evaluation of Flow Models According to Aerodynamic Characteristics of NACA 4412 Airfoil”, JAV, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 342–346, June 2026, doi: 10.30518/jav.1911107.
ISNAD
Ortamevzi, Gürkan. “Evaluation of Flow Models According to Aerodynamic Characteristics of NACA 4412 Airfoil”. Journal of Aviation 10/2 (June 1, 2026): 342-346. https://doi.org/10.30518/jav.1911107.
JAMA
1.Ortamevzi G. Evaluation of Flow Models According to Aerodynamic Characteristics of NACA 4412 Airfoil. JAV. 2026;10:342–346.
MLA
Ortamevzi, Gürkan. “Evaluation of Flow Models According to Aerodynamic Characteristics of NACA 4412 Airfoil”. Journal of Aviation, vol. 10, no. 2, June 2026, pp. 342-6, doi:10.30518/jav.1911107.
Vancouver
1.Gürkan Ortamevzi. Evaluation of Flow Models According to Aerodynamic Characteristics of NACA 4412 Airfoil. JAV. 2026 Jun. 1;10(2):342-6. doi:10.30518/jav.1911107

Journal of Aviation - JAV 


www.javsci.com - editor@javsci.com


9210This journal is licenced under a Creative Commons Attiribution-NonCommerical 4.0 İnternational Licence