The Effect of Different Teaching Methods in Teaching Leopold Maneuvers on Midwifery Students’ Learning Satisfaction and Self-Confidence Levels: RCT

Abstract

The Effect of Different Teaching Methods in Teaching Leopold Maneuvers on Midwifery Students’ Learning Satisfaction and Self-Confidence Levels: RCT

Abstract

Objective: The research was conducted to determine the effect of the simulation method in teaching Leopold maneuvers on the learning satisfaction and self-confidence of midwifery students. Methods: The research was conducted as a quasi-experimental, randomized controlled study. The universe of the study consisted of second-year students of a university's midwifery department. The study was completed with 61 students. After the students were given video-based training, the experimental group was given Leopold maneuvers training with a simulation model. The study was conducted with pregnant women in a university hospital. The data of the study were collected with the Sociodemographic Information Form, the Leopold Maneuvers Skill Evaluation Form and the Student Learning Satisfaction and Self-Confidence Scale. Results: The findings of the Leopold maneuvers skill assessment form on pregnant women were found to be significant in favor of the simulation group (p<0.05). The posttest score of the simulation group on the student satisfaction and self-confidence in learning scale was found to be significantly higher than their pretest score (p=0.043). Conclusion: It was determined that the simulation-based teaching technique had an effect on developing Leopold maneuvers practice skills. In addition, it was concluded that increased student satisfaction and self-confidence in learning. Keywords: Midwifery student, simulation education, Leopold maneuvers skill, self-confidence, satisfaction in learning

Keywords

• Midwifery student
• simulation education
• Leopold maneuvers skill
• self-confidence
• satisfaction in learning

References

1. Sağlık Bakanlığı. Ebelik Yönetmeliği. Sağlık Bakanlığı Resmi Gazete. 2024 [cited 2024 Dec 16]. Available from: https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2024/12/20241203-2.htm.
2. Erkaya R, Yeşilçiçek Çalık, K. Physiological changes in pregnancy. Yeşilçiçek Çalık K, Coşar Çetin F. (Editörler). Prenatal Period I for Midwives and Midwifery Students.Istanbul: Istanbul Medical Bookstores; 2018. p.125-48
3. Kachlik D, Kästner I, Baca V. Christian Gerhard Leopold: fascinating history of a productive obstetrician gynecologist. Obstetrical & gynecological survey 2012;67(1):1–5.
4. Türkmen H. Prenatal Değerlendirme. In: Aktaş S, Aksoy Derya Y, Toker E, editors. A’dan Z’ye Temel Ebelik. İstanbul: İstanbul Tıp Kitabevi; 2023.s.308-322.
5. Soğukpınar N. Ebe-Hemşire Fonksiyonu Olarak Leopold Manevralarının Gebelik Haftaları İle Fetal Malpresantsayonları Tanımlamadaki Etkinliğinin Araştırılması. Ege Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi 2000;16(1):25-35.
6. Joshi A, Panta OB, & Sharma B. Estimated Fetal Weight: Comparison of Clinical Versus Ultrasound Estimate. Journal of Nepal Health Research Council 2017;15(1):51 55.
7. Sarı D, Erdem H. The use of high fidelity simulation in nursing education: A Literature review. Journal of Human Sciences 2017;14(4):3690-3707.
8. Yılar Erkek Z, Öztürk Altınayak S. The effect of simulation teaching technique on the ımprovement of episiotomy performance skills and state anxiety of midwifery students in Turkey: RCT. Clinical Simulation in Nursing 2021;54(1):62-69.

9. Durmaz A, Elem E, Unutkan A, Keskin N.The effect of simulation on vaginal delivery skills and self-sufficiency levels. J Curr Res Health Secto 2017;7(2):41-52.
10. Robinson BK, Dearmon V. Evidence-based learning: the based nursing education: Effective use of instructional design and simulated learning environments to enhance knowledge transfer in undergraduate nursing students. Journal of Professional Nursing 2013;29(4);203-78.
11. Terzioğlu F, Yücel Ç, Koç G et al. A new strategy in nursing education: From hybrid simulation to clinical practice. Nurse Education Today 2016:39;104-108.
12. Mert Karadas M, Terzioglu F. The impact of the using high-fidelity simulation and standardized patients to management of postpartum hemorrhage in undergraduate nursing students: A randomized controlled study in Turkey. Health Care for Women International 2019;40(5):597-612.
13. Lewis R, Strachan A, Smith MM. Is high fidelity simulation the most effective method for the development of non-technical skills in nursing? A review of the current evidence. The Open Nursing Journal 2012;6:82.
14. Hughes C, Anderson G, Patterson D, O'Prey M. Introducing an obstetric emergency training strategy into a simulated environment. British Journal of Midwifery 2014;22(3):201-207.
15. Arias T, Tran A, Breaud J, Fournier JP,, Bongain A, Delotte J. A prospective study into the benefits of simulation training in teaching obstetric vaginal examination. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 2016;133(3):380-384.
16. Edeer AD, Sarikaya A. The use of simulation in nursing education and simulation types/Hemsirelik egitiminde simulasyon kullanimi ve simulasyon tipleri. Journal of Education and Research in Nursing 2015;12(2): 121-126.
17. Bayrı Bingöl F, Bal MD, Karakoç A, Aslan B. Ebelik çocuklarının doğum simülasyonu eğitim deneyimleri. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 2020;(4):711-718.
18. Kahraman A, Şen Aytekin M, Çetin Ö. Effectiveness of Simulation Methods Used for Teaching Vaginal Examination to Midwifery Students; Systematic Review. J TOGU Heal Sci 2022;2(1):88-98.
19. Uyar Hazar H, Gültekin S. Ebelik eğitiminde simülasyon kullanımı. Yaşam Bilimleri 2019;14(3):74-83.
20. Esencan TY, Yıldırım AD, Daştan K, Güder A. Normal ve riskli doğum simülasyon uygulamalarinin ebelik öğrencilerinin memnuniyeti ve kendine güvenlerine etkisinin değerlendirilmesi. İnönü Üniversitesi Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksek Okulu Dergisi 2022;10(3):903-917.
21. İldan Çalım S, Öztürk E. Ebelik beceri eğitiminde simülasyon kullanımı: sistematik derleme. Uluslararası Hakemli Kadın Hastalıkları ve Anne Çocuk Sağlığı Dergisi 2018;12, 143-168.
22. Özçoban FA, Ergün S, Karaca PP, Karadaş A, Kaynak S, Çalışkan T. Sağlık bilimleri fakültesi öğrencilerinin simülasyon eğitimine ilişkin bilgi düzeyleri ve farkındalıkları. Online Turkish Journal of Health Sciences 2021;6(4), 583-590.
23. Şen Aytekin M, Kahraman A, Alparslan Ö. Effect of simulatıon methods used for teachıng epsiotomy to midwifery students: A systematic review. J TOGU Heal Sci 2022;2(2):212-224.
24. Kaplan S, Peksoy-Kaya S, Başkaya E, Şahin S, Ariöz-Düzgün A, Dumo AM. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Different Training Techniques in the Development of Leopold's Maneuver Skills: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Simul Healthc 2023;18(2);108-116.
25. Díez-Goñi N, Guillén S, Rodríguez-Díez MC, Pineda L, Alcázar JL. Use of the Learning Curve–Cumulative Summation Test for Leopold Maneuvers Assessment in a Simulator: A Pilot Study. Simulation in Healthcare, 2015;10(5), 277-282.
26. Kalyoncu E. The Effect of Teaching Methods Used in Leopold Maneuvers Training on Midwifery Students' Satisfaction (Unpublished Master's Thesis). Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul. Turkey. 2019. https://acikerisim.medipol.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/20.500.12511/7612
27. Khadivzadeh T, Erfanian F. The effects of simulated patients and simulated gynecologic models on student anxiety in providing IUD services. Simul Healthc 2012;7(5);282-287.
28. Khalaila R. Simulation in nursing education: an evaluation of students' outcomes at their first clinical practice combined with simulations. Nurse Education Today 2014:34(2);252-258.
29. Demirel G, Evcili F, Kaya N, Doganer A. The effect of episiotomy repair simulation on the anxiety and self-efficacy levels of midwifery students. Journal of Midwifery and Reproductive Health 2020;8(1):2050-2057.
30. Guler H, Cetin P, Yurtsal ZB et al. Effect of episiotomy training with beef tongue and sponge simulators on the self-confidence building of midwifery students. Nurse Educ Pract 2018;30:1-6.
31. Karaçay P, Kaya H. The Turkish Adaptation of the Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale Used in Simulation Education. F.N. Hem. Derg 2017;25(2):95-103.
32. Çam MO, Baysan-Arabacı L. Qualitative and quantitative steps on attitude scale construction. Hemar-G, 2010;12(2):59-71.
33. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010;8(18):1741-7015.
34. Rodríguez-Díez MC, Díez-Goñi N, Beunza-Nuin JJ et al. Confianza de los estudiantes de medicina en el aprendizaje de la exploración obstétrica con simuladores [Confidence assessment among medical students trained with an obstetric simulator]. An Sist Sanit Navar 2013;36(2):275-80.
35. Deering SH, Hodor JG, Wylen M, Poggi S, Nielsen PE, Satin AJ.Additional training with an obstetric simulator improves medical student comfort with basic procedures. Simulation Healthcare 2006;1(1):32-34.
36. Ünsal-Atan Ş, Güleç-Şatır D, Öztürk R et al. The effect of using high fidelity birthing simulator on satisfaction and performance of nursing students in developing obstetric skills. FNJN 2019;27(1):1-16.
37. Corbridge SJ, Robinson FP, Tiffen J, Corbridge TC. Online learning versus simulation for teaching principles of mechanical ventilation to nurse practitioner students. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh 2010;7:Article12.
38. Akgün A, Özden M, Çinici A, Aslan A, Berber S. An investigation of the effect of technology based education on scientific process skills and academic achievement. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences 2014;13(48): 27-46.
39. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 1977;84(2):191-215.
40. McLelland G, Perera C, Morphet J et al. simulation of birth in a non-maternity setting for pre-professional students. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;58:25-31.
41. Alparslan Ö, Çetin Ö, Çataloluk A, Kahraman A. The effect of vocational skill training model given by simulators on academic achievement and anxiety levels of midwifery students. International Scientific and Vocational Studies Journal 2021;5(1):50-61.