Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2023, Volume: 7 Issue: 1, 245 - 250, 31.01.2023
https://doi.org/10.30621/jbachs.1091385

Abstract

Supporting Institution

yok

Project Number

yok

Thanks

yok

References

  • 1.Ho B, Baumhauer J. Hallux rigidus. EFORT Open Rev. 2017 Mar 13;2(1):13-20. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.160031. PMID: 28607766; PMCID: PMC5444234.
  • 2.Lam A, Chan JJ, Surace MF, Vulcano E. Hallux rigidus: How do I approach it? World J Orthop. 2017 May 18;8(5):364-371. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v8.i5.364. PMID: 28567339; PMCID: PMC5434342.
  • 3.Elliott AD, Borgert AJ, Roukis TS. A Prospective Comparison of Clinical, Radiographic, and Intraoperative Features of Hallux Rigidus: Long-Term Follow-Up and Analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016 May-Jun;55(3):547-61. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2016.01.040. Epub 2016 Mar 3. PMID: 26948243.
  • 4.Deland JT, Williams BR. Surgical management of hallux rigidus. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012 Jun;20(6):347-58. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-20-06-347. PMID: 22661564.
  • 5.McNeil DS, Baumhauer JF, Glazebrook MA. Evidence-based analysis of the efficacy for operative treatment of hallux rigidus. Foot Ankle Int. 2013 Jan;34(1):15-32. doi: 10.1177/1071100712460220. PMID: 23386758.
  • 6.Fuhrmann RA. First metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis for hallux rigidus. Foot Ankle Clin. 2011 Mar;16(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2010.12.003. PMID: 21338925.
  • 7.Hoveidaei AH, Roshanshad A, Vosoughi AR. Clinical and radiological outcomes after arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Int Orthop. 2021 Mar;45(3):711-719. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04807-3. Epub 2020 Sep 14. PMID: 32929546.
  • 8.Restuccia G, Cosseddu F, Del Chiaro A, Ceccoli M, Lippi A, Shytaj S. First metatarsophalangeal fusion with dorsal plate: clinical outcomes. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jun 6;16(1):361. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02453-y. PMID: 34092260; PMCID: PMC8183079.
  • 9.Chraim M, Bock P, Alrabai HM, Trnka HJ. Long-term outcome of first metatarsophalangeal joint fusion in the treatment of severe hallux rigidus. Int Orthop. 2016 Nov;40(11):2401-2408. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3277-1. Epub 2016 Aug 20. PMID: 27542800.
  • 10.Hyer CF, Glover JP, Berlet GC, Lee TH. Cost comparison of crossed screws versus dorsal plate construct for first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2008 Jan-Feb;47(1):13-8. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2007.08.016. Epub 2007 Nov 13. PMID: 18156059.
  • 11.Fuld RS 3rd, Kumparatana P, Kelley J, Anderson N, Baldini T, Younger ASE, Hunt KJ. Biomechanical Comparison of Low-Profile Contoured Locking Plate With Single Compression Screw to Fully Threaded Compression Screws for First MTP Fusion. Foot Ankle Int. 2019 Jul;40(7):836-844. doi: 10.1177/1071100719837524. Epub 2019 Mar 17. PMID: 30880450.
  • 12.Womack JW, Ishikawa SN. First metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Clin. 2009 Mar;14(1):43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2008.11.008. PMID: 19232991.
  • 13.Hyer CF, Scott RT, Swiatek M. A retrospective comparison of first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis using a locked plate and compression screw technique. Foot Ankle Spec. 2012 Oct;5(5):289-92. doi: 10.1177/1938640012457936. Epub 2012 Aug 30. PMID: 22935413.
  • 14.Ellington JK, Jones CP, Cohen BE, Davis WH, Nickisch F, Anderson RB. Review of 107 hallux MTP joint arthrodesis using dome-shaped reamers and a stainless-steel dorsal plate. Foot Ankle Int. 2010 May;31(5):385-90. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2010.0385. PMID: 20460064.
  • 15.Flavin R, Stephens MM. Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint using a dorsal titanium contoured plate. Foot Ankle Int. 2004 Nov;25(11):783-7. doi: 10.1177/107110070402501105. PMID: 15574236.
  • 16.Maleki F, Ramesh A, Cassar-Gheiti AJ, Fox C, Kelly P, Stephens MM, McKenna JV. Comparison of 4 different techniques in first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis. Ir J Med Sci. 2019 Aug;188(3):885-891. doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-01961-x. Epub 2019 Jan 8. PMID: 30617457.
  • 17.Ettl V, Radke S, Gaertner M, Walther M. Arthrodesis in the treatment of hallux rigidus. Int Orthop. 2003;27(6):382-5. doi: 10.1007/s00264-003-0492-3. Epub 2003 Aug 26. PMID: 12942194; PMCID: PMC3461880.
  • 18.Hoveidaei AH, Roshanshad A, Vosoughi AR. Clinical and radiological outcomes after arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Int Orthop. 2021 Mar;45(3):711-719. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04807-3. Epub 2020 Sep 14. PMID: 32929546.
  • 19.Fanous RN, Ridgers S, Sott AH. Minimally invasive arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint for hallux rigidus. Foot Ankle Surg. 2014 Sep;20(3):170-3. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2014.03.004. Epub 2014 Apr 2. PMID: 25103703.
  • 20.Lunati M, Mahmoud K, Kadakia R, Coleman M, Bariteau J. Complications Associated with the Surgical Management of Hallux Rigidus. Orthop Clin North Am. 2021 Jul;52(3):291-296. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2021.03.003. Epub 2021 May 6. PMID: 34053574.
  • 21.Filomeno, P., & López, J. (2018). First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis: functional outcomes using 2 different fixation techniques. Is more expensive better?. Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics, 3(3), 2473011417752674.
  • 22.Moon JL, McGlamry MC. First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis: current fixation options. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2011 Apr;28(2):405-19, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.cpm.2011.02.002. PMID: 21669346.

Retrospective Comparison of Two Different Fixation Methods for First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis

Year 2023, Volume: 7 Issue: 1, 245 - 250, 31.01.2023
https://doi.org/10.30621/jbachs.1091385

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Arthrosis of the first MTP joint is a common condition. Among the available arthrodesis methods, plate/screw and screw methods are the current treatment methods of choice. In this study, we investigate whether there is a difference between these two methods.
Methods: Thirty-four toes of 32 patients with advanced arthrosis were included in the study. Eighteen toes were fixed with plates/screws and 16 with cross-screws. In the radiological evaluations, malunion and nonunion were examined. Clinical evaluation was made according to AOFAS-HMI scoring.
Results: The mean age of the patients was 57.74 years and the mean follow-up period was 22.21 months. There was no statistically significant difference in clinical scores or union times between the two groups. As complications, superficial skin problems developed in 2 (5.9%) cases, deep infection in 3 (8.8%) cases, and nonunion in 3 (8.8%) cases. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in this regard.
Conclusion: Plate/screw and cross-screw techniques give similar clinical and radiological results in cases of arthrodesis of the first MTP joint. The cross-screw technique, which can be performed more easily and has lower costs, should be the first choice.

Project Number

yok

References

  • 1.Ho B, Baumhauer J. Hallux rigidus. EFORT Open Rev. 2017 Mar 13;2(1):13-20. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.160031. PMID: 28607766; PMCID: PMC5444234.
  • 2.Lam A, Chan JJ, Surace MF, Vulcano E. Hallux rigidus: How do I approach it? World J Orthop. 2017 May 18;8(5):364-371. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v8.i5.364. PMID: 28567339; PMCID: PMC5434342.
  • 3.Elliott AD, Borgert AJ, Roukis TS. A Prospective Comparison of Clinical, Radiographic, and Intraoperative Features of Hallux Rigidus: Long-Term Follow-Up and Analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016 May-Jun;55(3):547-61. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2016.01.040. Epub 2016 Mar 3. PMID: 26948243.
  • 4.Deland JT, Williams BR. Surgical management of hallux rigidus. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012 Jun;20(6):347-58. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-20-06-347. PMID: 22661564.
  • 5.McNeil DS, Baumhauer JF, Glazebrook MA. Evidence-based analysis of the efficacy for operative treatment of hallux rigidus. Foot Ankle Int. 2013 Jan;34(1):15-32. doi: 10.1177/1071100712460220. PMID: 23386758.
  • 6.Fuhrmann RA. First metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis for hallux rigidus. Foot Ankle Clin. 2011 Mar;16(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2010.12.003. PMID: 21338925.
  • 7.Hoveidaei AH, Roshanshad A, Vosoughi AR. Clinical and radiological outcomes after arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Int Orthop. 2021 Mar;45(3):711-719. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04807-3. Epub 2020 Sep 14. PMID: 32929546.
  • 8.Restuccia G, Cosseddu F, Del Chiaro A, Ceccoli M, Lippi A, Shytaj S. First metatarsophalangeal fusion with dorsal plate: clinical outcomes. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jun 6;16(1):361. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02453-y. PMID: 34092260; PMCID: PMC8183079.
  • 9.Chraim M, Bock P, Alrabai HM, Trnka HJ. Long-term outcome of first metatarsophalangeal joint fusion in the treatment of severe hallux rigidus. Int Orthop. 2016 Nov;40(11):2401-2408. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3277-1. Epub 2016 Aug 20. PMID: 27542800.
  • 10.Hyer CF, Glover JP, Berlet GC, Lee TH. Cost comparison of crossed screws versus dorsal plate construct for first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2008 Jan-Feb;47(1):13-8. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2007.08.016. Epub 2007 Nov 13. PMID: 18156059.
  • 11.Fuld RS 3rd, Kumparatana P, Kelley J, Anderson N, Baldini T, Younger ASE, Hunt KJ. Biomechanical Comparison of Low-Profile Contoured Locking Plate With Single Compression Screw to Fully Threaded Compression Screws for First MTP Fusion. Foot Ankle Int. 2019 Jul;40(7):836-844. doi: 10.1177/1071100719837524. Epub 2019 Mar 17. PMID: 30880450.
  • 12.Womack JW, Ishikawa SN. First metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Clin. 2009 Mar;14(1):43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2008.11.008. PMID: 19232991.
  • 13.Hyer CF, Scott RT, Swiatek M. A retrospective comparison of first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis using a locked plate and compression screw technique. Foot Ankle Spec. 2012 Oct;5(5):289-92. doi: 10.1177/1938640012457936. Epub 2012 Aug 30. PMID: 22935413.
  • 14.Ellington JK, Jones CP, Cohen BE, Davis WH, Nickisch F, Anderson RB. Review of 107 hallux MTP joint arthrodesis using dome-shaped reamers and a stainless-steel dorsal plate. Foot Ankle Int. 2010 May;31(5):385-90. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2010.0385. PMID: 20460064.
  • 15.Flavin R, Stephens MM. Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint using a dorsal titanium contoured plate. Foot Ankle Int. 2004 Nov;25(11):783-7. doi: 10.1177/107110070402501105. PMID: 15574236.
  • 16.Maleki F, Ramesh A, Cassar-Gheiti AJ, Fox C, Kelly P, Stephens MM, McKenna JV. Comparison of 4 different techniques in first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis. Ir J Med Sci. 2019 Aug;188(3):885-891. doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-01961-x. Epub 2019 Jan 8. PMID: 30617457.
  • 17.Ettl V, Radke S, Gaertner M, Walther M. Arthrodesis in the treatment of hallux rigidus. Int Orthop. 2003;27(6):382-5. doi: 10.1007/s00264-003-0492-3. Epub 2003 Aug 26. PMID: 12942194; PMCID: PMC3461880.
  • 18.Hoveidaei AH, Roshanshad A, Vosoughi AR. Clinical and radiological outcomes after arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Int Orthop. 2021 Mar;45(3):711-719. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04807-3. Epub 2020 Sep 14. PMID: 32929546.
  • 19.Fanous RN, Ridgers S, Sott AH. Minimally invasive arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint for hallux rigidus. Foot Ankle Surg. 2014 Sep;20(3):170-3. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2014.03.004. Epub 2014 Apr 2. PMID: 25103703.
  • 20.Lunati M, Mahmoud K, Kadakia R, Coleman M, Bariteau J. Complications Associated with the Surgical Management of Hallux Rigidus. Orthop Clin North Am. 2021 Jul;52(3):291-296. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2021.03.003. Epub 2021 May 6. PMID: 34053574.
  • 21.Filomeno, P., & López, J. (2018). First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis: functional outcomes using 2 different fixation techniques. Is more expensive better?. Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics, 3(3), 2473011417752674.
  • 22.Moon JL, McGlamry MC. First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis: current fixation options. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2011 Apr;28(2):405-19, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.cpm.2011.02.002. PMID: 21669346.
There are 22 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Mehmet Akdemir 0000-0001-9638-4907

Ahmet Cemil Turan 0000-0002-7149-3055

Ali İhsan Kılıç 0000-0001-7491-6044

Project Number yok
Publication Date January 31, 2023
Submission Date March 22, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2023 Volume: 7 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Akdemir, M., Turan, A. C., & Kılıç, A. İ. (2023). Retrospective Comparison of Two Different Fixation Methods for First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis. Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences, 7(1), 245-250. https://doi.org/10.30621/jbachs.1091385
AMA Akdemir M, Turan AC, Kılıç Aİ. Retrospective Comparison of Two Different Fixation Methods for First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis. JBACHS. January 2023;7(1):245-250. doi:10.30621/jbachs.1091385
Chicago Akdemir, Mehmet, Ahmet Cemil Turan, and Ali İhsan Kılıç. “Retrospective Comparison of Two Different Fixation Methods for First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis”. Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences 7, no. 1 (January 2023): 245-50. https://doi.org/10.30621/jbachs.1091385.
EndNote Akdemir M, Turan AC, Kılıç Aİ (January 1, 2023) Retrospective Comparison of Two Different Fixation Methods for First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis. Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences 7 1 245–250.
IEEE M. Akdemir, A. C. Turan, and A. İ. Kılıç, “Retrospective Comparison of Two Different Fixation Methods for First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis”, JBACHS, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 245–250, 2023, doi: 10.30621/jbachs.1091385.
ISNAD Akdemir, Mehmet et al. “Retrospective Comparison of Two Different Fixation Methods for First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis”. Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences 7/1 (January 2023), 245-250. https://doi.org/10.30621/jbachs.1091385.
JAMA Akdemir M, Turan AC, Kılıç Aİ. Retrospective Comparison of Two Different Fixation Methods for First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis. JBACHS. 2023;7:245–250.
MLA Akdemir, Mehmet et al. “Retrospective Comparison of Two Different Fixation Methods for First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis”. Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences, vol. 7, no. 1, 2023, pp. 245-50, doi:10.30621/jbachs.1091385.
Vancouver Akdemir M, Turan AC, Kılıç Aİ. Retrospective Comparison of Two Different Fixation Methods for First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis. JBACHS. 2023;7(1):245-50.