WHAT IS WRONG WITH PRIVATE SHOPPING SITES? – EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY

Volume: 4 Number: 3 September 29, 2015
EN

WHAT IS WRONG WITH PRIVATE SHOPPING SITES? – EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY

Abstract

Since 2008, private shopping sites have been amongst the leading business models in the world. However, with the growing number of these companies, there are some problems which are declared by the customers through online platforms. Hence, this study provides evidence from Turkey through the examination of the customer complaints from the leading private shopping sites. In this regard, 1,014 customer complaints were analyzed for the period of three months (April, May and June 2013) from the popular online platform “sikayetvar.com”. The findings reveal that private shopping sites have same types of customer complaints which occur mainly due to problems in the logistics capabilities of the companies. However, number of complaints differs significantly according to private shopping sites and months. This study contributes to literature through identification of variations in the number and category of complaints across months and among private shopping sites. Additionally, it provides managerial implications for private shopping sites to improve the logistics capabilities and other facilities

References

  1. • Ayadi, N., Giraud, M. and Gonzalez C., 2013, “An investigation of consumers’ self control mechanism when confronted with repeated purchase temptations: Evidence from online private sales,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 20(2013), 272-281.
  2. • Bae, S. and Lee T., 2011, “Gender differences in consumers’ perception of online consumer reviews,” Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 11, 201-214.
  3. • Bearden, W. O. and Teel, J. E., 1983, “Selected determinants of customer satisfaction and complaint reports,” Journal of Marketing Research, 20(1), 21–28.
  4. • Berman, B. and Evans, J. R., 2004, “Retail Management, A Strategic Approach,” 9th Edition, USA: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  5. • Börühan, G., 2014, “The impact of logistics service quality on customer satisfaction during the process of order fulfillment in E-Commerce, the associated practices for online private shopping sites,” PhD Thesis, Institute of Social Sciences, Yaşar University, İzmir.
  6. • Cooke, J. A., 2000, “The physical challenges of the virtual sale, Logistics Management and Distribution Report,” 39(10), 67-73.
  7. • Deloitte 2012, “European eCommerce assessment 2012 benchmarking the top 200 in online retail,” https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/nl/Documents/consumer- business/deloitte-nl-european-ecommerce-assessment-2012.pdf.
  8. • Deloitte, 2014, “Global

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Publication Date

September 29, 2015

Submission Date

November 8, 2015

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2015 Volume: 4 Number: 3

APA
Boruhan, G., Ersoy, P., & Yumurtaci, I. O. (2015). WHAT IS WRONG WITH PRIVATE SHOPPING SITES? – EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2015313062
AMA
1.Boruhan G, Ersoy P, Yumurtaci IO. WHAT IS WRONG WITH PRIVATE SHOPPING SITES? – EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY. JBEF. 2015;4(3). doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2015313062
Chicago
Boruhan, Gulmus, Pervin Ersoy, and Isik Ozge Yumurtaci. 2015. “WHAT IS WRONG WITH PRIVATE SHOPPING SITES? – EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY”. Journal of Business Economics and Finance 4 (3). https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2015313062.
EndNote
Boruhan G, Ersoy P, Yumurtaci IO (November 1, 2015) WHAT IS WRONG WITH PRIVATE SHOPPING SITES? – EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY. Journal of Business Economics and Finance 4 3
IEEE
[1]G. Boruhan, P. Ersoy, and I. O. Yumurtaci, “WHAT IS WRONG WITH PRIVATE SHOPPING SITES? – EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY”, JBEF, vol. 4, no. 3, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2015313062.
ISNAD
Boruhan, Gulmus - Ersoy, Pervin - Yumurtaci, Isik Ozge. “WHAT IS WRONG WITH PRIVATE SHOPPING SITES? – EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY”. Journal of Business Economics and Finance 4/3 (November 1, 2015). https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2015313062.
JAMA
1.Boruhan G, Ersoy P, Yumurtaci IO. WHAT IS WRONG WITH PRIVATE SHOPPING SITES? – EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY. JBEF. 2015;4. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2015313062.
MLA
Boruhan, Gulmus, et al. “WHAT IS WRONG WITH PRIVATE SHOPPING SITES? – EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY”. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, vol. 4, no. 3, Nov. 2015, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2015313062.
Vancouver
1.Gulmus Boruhan, Pervin Ersoy, Isik Ozge Yumurtaci. WHAT IS WRONG WITH PRIVATE SHOPPING SITES? – EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY. JBEF. 2015 Nov. 1;4(3). doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2015313062

Journal of Business, Economics and Finance (JBEF) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, semi-annual and open-access journal. The publication language is English. The journal publishes 2 issues a year. The issuing months are June and December. The journal aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers and researchers working in the areas of business, economics and finance. The Editor of JBEF invites all manuscripts that that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JBEF charges no submission or publication fee.



Ethics Policy - JBEF applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JBEF is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).


Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.