Research Article

A COMPARISON OF THE INNOVATION PERFORMANCE OF TURKEY WITH THE EUROPEAN UNION

Volume: 6 Number: 2 June 30, 2017
EN

A COMPARISON OF THE INNOVATION PERFORMANCE OF TURKEY WITH THE EUROPEAN UNION

Abstract

Purpose – The aim of this study is to examine recent innovation performance of Turkey in comparison to the European Union member states and hence to determine in which dimensions Turkey lags behind the European Union countries.  

Methodology – In order to investigate Turkey’s innovation performance in comparison to the European Union member states European Innovation Scoreboard 2016 is descriptively analysed.    

Findings-According to the results of the descriptive analysis, it is found that the innovation performance of Turkey has generally improved in recent years. However, Turkey falls behind the European Union countries in terms of a number of dimensions of the innovation performance.  

Conclusion-Although Turkey has improved its innovation performance recently it still lags behind from the European Union countries with regard to the several dimensions of innovation. Thus, the policies which help firms to increase their innovation performance should be implemented in order to reach better outcomes in the future.  

Keywords

References

  1. Aghion, P., Howitt, P. 1992, “A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction”, Econometrica, vol. 60, no. 2, pp.323–351.
  2. Cameron, G. 1998, “Innovation and Growth: A Survey of the Empirical Evidence”, http://www.nuff.ox.ac.uk/users/cameron/papers/ empiric.pdf, 10.04.2017.
  3. European Union 2016a, “European Innovation Scoreboard 2016”, http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/17822, 01.05.2017.
  4. European Union 2016b, European Innovation Scoreboard 2016-Database, http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/17823, 01.05.2017.
  5. European Union 2016c, “European Innovation Scoreboard 2016-Country Profiles-Turkey”, http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/17860, 01.05.2017.
  6. Grossman, G. M., Helpman, E. 1990, “Trade, Innovation, and Growth”, The American Economic Review, vol.80, no.2, pp.86–91.
  7. Grossman, G. M., Helpman, E. 1991, Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  8. Guloglu, B., Tekin, R. B. 2012, “A Panel Causality Analysis of the Relationship among Research and Development, Innovation, and Economic Growth in High-Income OECD Countries”, Euroasian Economic Review, vol. 2, vol. 1, pp.32–47.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

June 30, 2017

Submission Date

April 10, 2017

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2017 Volume: 6 Number: 2

APA
Sener, S., & Tunali, C. B. (2017). A COMPARISON OF THE INNOVATION PERFORMANCE OF TURKEY WITH THE EUROPEAN UNION. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, 6(2), 141-146. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.503
AMA
1.Sener S, Tunali CB. A COMPARISON OF THE INNOVATION PERFORMANCE OF TURKEY WITH THE EUROPEAN UNION. JBEF. 2017;6(2):141-146. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.503
Chicago
Sener, Sefer, and Cigdem Borke Tunali. 2017. “A COMPARISON OF THE INNOVATION PERFORMANCE OF TURKEY WITH THE EUROPEAN UNION”. Journal of Business Economics and Finance 6 (2): 141-46. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.503.
EndNote
Sener S, Tunali CB (June 1, 2017) A COMPARISON OF THE INNOVATION PERFORMANCE OF TURKEY WITH THE EUROPEAN UNION. Journal of Business Economics and Finance 6 2 141–146.
IEEE
[1]S. Sener and C. B. Tunali, “A COMPARISON OF THE INNOVATION PERFORMANCE OF TURKEY WITH THE EUROPEAN UNION”, JBEF, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 141–146, June 2017, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.503.
ISNAD
Sener, Sefer - Tunali, Cigdem Borke. “A COMPARISON OF THE INNOVATION PERFORMANCE OF TURKEY WITH THE EUROPEAN UNION”. Journal of Business Economics and Finance 6/2 (June 1, 2017): 141-146. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.503.
JAMA
1.Sener S, Tunali CB. A COMPARISON OF THE INNOVATION PERFORMANCE OF TURKEY WITH THE EUROPEAN UNION. JBEF. 2017;6:141–146.
MLA
Sener, Sefer, and Cigdem Borke Tunali. “A COMPARISON OF THE INNOVATION PERFORMANCE OF TURKEY WITH THE EUROPEAN UNION”. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, vol. 6, no. 2, June 2017, pp. 141-6, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.503.
Vancouver
1.Sefer Sener, Cigdem Borke Tunali. A COMPARISON OF THE INNOVATION PERFORMANCE OF TURKEY WITH THE EUROPEAN UNION. JBEF. 2017 Jun. 1;6(2):141-6. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.503

Journal of Business, Economics and Finance (JBEF) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, semi-annual and open-access journal. The publication language is English. The journal publishes 2 issues a year. The issuing months are June and December. The journal aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers and researchers working in the areas of business, economics and finance. The Editor of JBEF invites all manuscripts that that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JBEF charges no submission or publication fee.



Ethics Policy - JBEF applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JBEF is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).


Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.