INNOVATION EXPERIENCE OF ENTREPRENEURS OF HIGH TECH SMEs IN TURKEY

Year 2017, , 177 - 190, 30.06.2017

Dilek Demirbas

https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.507

Abstract

Purpose- The goal of this study is to explore and define the barriers
to innovation perceived and experienced by entrepreneurs of High Tech SMEs in
Turkey.

Methodology- In order to
investigate the research question, an online questionnaire that was created for
the purpose of this analysis. 
Questionnaire consists of 25 questions covering up four groups of
barriers to innovation (formal, informal, environmental and skill barriers). In
total, 225 High Tech SME entrepreneurs from the Istanbul region completed the
questionnaire. Logit models were estimated using the Eviews software
programme.

Findings- An analysis
of 225 High Tech Turkish SME entrepreneurs reveals the fact that “lack of
sufficient government’s R&D and technology policy” from formal barriers;
“Informal economy’s negative impact on investment” from informal barriers;
“high cost of innovation” and “lack of appropriate source of finance” from
environmental barriers and “lack of qualified personnel” from skill barriers,
are the most important barriers, which have significant effects on the
entrepreneurs’ innovation decisions in Turkey.

Conclusion- The survey results show that entrepreneurs, who know
how to innovate, are those who have more perception of the barriers to
innovation. However it is observed through the logistic regression model that
some of the relations established between the barriers to innovation and the
entrepreneurial innovative capacity are not statistically significant. 

Keywords

High Tech SMEs, Barriers to Innovation, Entrepreneur, Turkey

References

• Acs, Z. and Audretch, D. (1988), “Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis”, American Economic Review Vol.78, No. 4, pp. 678-690.
• Acs, Z. and Audretch, D. (1990), Innovation and Small Firms, Cambridge MA.
• Aidis, R. (2002), “Why don’t we see more SMEs in Luthuania?”, Timbergen Institute Discussion Paper, TI 2002-0389/2.
• Anderson, A., Jack, S. and McAuley, A. (2001), “Periphery? What periphery? Marketing to a state of mind”, Marketing Review, Vol. 14, No.1, pp. 26-34.
• Anderson, T., Serger, S. S., Sorvik, J. and Nasson, E. W. (2004), “The Cluster Policies” Whitebook; IKED Memmo.
• Arora, A., Fosfuri, A., and Gambardella, A. (2002), Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy, Cambridge, MA
• Baldwin, J., and Lin, Z. (2002), “Impediments to advanced technology adoption for Canadian manufacturers”, Research Policy, Vol. 31, No.1, pp. 1–18.
• Baldwin, J.R. and Gellatly, G. (2004), Innovation Strategies and Performance in Small Firms, Ottawa.
• Barlett, W. and Bukvic, V. (2001), “Barriers to SME Growth in Slovenia”, MOCT_MOST, 11, pp. 177-195.
• Baron, R. and J. Tang (2009), “The role of entrepreneurs in firm-level innovation: Joint effects of positive affect, creativity, and environmental dynamism” Journal of Business Venturing, 26, pp. 49-60.
• Bobera, D. (2013), “Barriers To Innovation In Northern Backa County”, Discussion Paper
• Brush, C. (1992), “Research on Women Business Owners: Past Trends, A New Perspective and Future Directions”, Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice, pp. 5-30.
• Buggie, F. (2001), “The four phases of innovation”, The Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 36-43. Cooney, T. M., and O’Connor, A. (1996), “A survey of perceived barriers to innovation across countries”, Paper presented to EFMD 25th Small Business Seminar, Cyprus, Sept.
• Cooper, R. J. (1998), “A multidimensional approach to the adoption of innovation”, Management Decision, Vol. 36, No. 8, pp. 493-502.
• Davidsson, P. (1989), Continued Entrepreneurship and Small Firm Growth. Diss. Stockholm School of Economics, April.
• Drucker, P. (1985), Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Macmillan, Basingstoke
• Drucker, P. F. (1994), Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles. London: Heinemann.
• Evanson, R. E. and Johnson, D. N. K. (1998), “Invention in Less-Developed Countries”, Mimeo Wellesley College and Yale University.
• Evenson, R. E. and Westphal, L. E. (1995), “Technological Change and Technological Strategy”, in J. Behrman and T. N. Srinivasan, (eds) Handbook of Development Economics, Amsterdam, North-Holland, 2211-99.
• FES (2004), “SME and Innovation”, Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Paper 10/2004, Bonn
• Fransman, M. (1985), “Conceptualizing Technical Change in the Third World in the 1980s; An Interpretative Survey”, Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 572-652.
• Freel, M., (2005), “Patterns of innovation and skills in small firms”, Technovation, Vol. 25, pp. 123–134.
• Galia, F., and Legros, D. (2004), “Complementarities between obstacles to innovation: Evidence from France”, Research Policy, Vol. 33, No. 8, pp. 1185–1199.
• Gatrell, J. (2001), “Integrated dependence: knowledge-based industries in peripheral regions”, Economic Development Review, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 63-9.
• Glas, M., Drnovsek, M. and Mirtic, D. (2000), “Problems faced by new entrepreneurs; S;ovenia and Croatia”, in 30th European Small Business Seminar, Gent, Belgium.
• Griffiths, W. E., Hill, R. C. and Judge, G. G. (1993), Learning and Practicing Econometrics, New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
• Grupp, H. (2001), Managing new product development and innovation: A microeconomic toolbox. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
• Gujarati, D. N. (2002), Basic Econometrics, 3rd Ed., New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
• Hadjimanolis, A. (1999), “Barriers to innovation for SMEs in a small less developed country (Cyprus)”, Technovation, Vol. 19, No. 9, September, pp. 561-570
• Hakim, C. (1989), Identifying Fast Growth Small Firms. Employment Gazette, Jan, pp. 29-41.
• Hargadon, A. and Sutton, R. (2000), “Building and innovation factory”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 78, No. 4, pp. 157-70.
• Hattori, R. and Wycoff, J. (2002), “Innovation DNA: a good idea is not enough. It has to create value”, Training and Development, Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 25-39.
• Herbig, P., Golden, E. J., and Dunphy, A. (1994), “The relationship of structure to entrepreneurial and innovative success”, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol.12, No. 9, pp. 37-48.
• IKED (2004), “Strengthening Innovation and Technology Policies for SME Development in Turkey’, International Organization for Knowledge Economy and Enterprise Development, December, 2004, Malmo.
• Johnson, D. (2001), “What is innovation and entrepreneurship? Lessons for large organizations”, Industrial and Commercial Training, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 135-140.
• Johnson, S. and Loveman, G. (1995), Starting over an Eastern Europe: Entrepreneurship and Economic Renewal, Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.
• Johnson, S., Kaufman, D., MacMillan, J. and Woodruff, C. (2000), ‘Why do Firms Hide? Bribes abs Unofficial Activity After Communism”, Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 76, pp. 495-520.
• Judge, G. G., Griffiths, W. E., Hill, R.C., Lutkeponl, H. and Lee, T. (1985), The Theory and Practice of Econometrics. (Eds.) New York: John Wiley and Sons.
• Kanungo, R.N. (1998), Entrepreneurship and innovation: Models for development. London: Sage.
• Kaufmann, A. and Tödtling, F. (2001), “Science-industry Interaction in the Process of Innovation: the Importance of Boundary-crossing Between Systems”, Research Policy, 30, pp. 791-804.
• Keegan, J., O’Connor, A., Cooney, T., Ylinenpää, H., Barth, H., Vesalainen, J., Pihkala, T. Deschoolmeester, D., and Debbaut, A. (1997), Facing The Challenge - Towards a Better Understanding of Barriers to Innovation in Irish, Swedish, Finnish and Belgian SMEs. Paper presented to EFMDs 27th European Small Business Seminar in Rhodes, Greece, September.
• Kirzner, I. M. (1985), Discovery and the Capitalist Process, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1985, pp. 10-70.
• KOSGEP (2004), Saha Arastirma Calismasi On Degerlendirme, Raporu, Ankara
• Kumar, N. and Sagip, M. (1996), “Firm-size, opportunities for Adaption and in-house R&D Activity in Developing Countries; The Case of Indian Manufacturing”, Research Policy, Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 713-22.
• Lall, S. (1983), “Determinants of R&D in an LDC; The Indian Engineering Industry”, Economics Letters, Vol. 13, pp. 379-383.
• Lall, S., Barba-Navaretti, G., Teitel, S. and Wignaraja, G. (1994), Technology and Enterprise Development-Ghana under Structural Adjustment. Macmillan Press, Hampshire, UK.
• Legge, J., and Hindle, K. (1997), Entrepreneurship: How innovators create the future. Melbourne: MacMillian Publishers.
• Leibenstein, H. (1995), "The Supply of Entrepreneurship," Leading Issues in Economic Development, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 273-275.
• Levy, B. (1993), “Obstacles to Developing Indigenous Small and Medium Enterprises: An Empirical Assessment”, The World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 7, No.1, pp. 65-83.
• Madrid-Guijarro, A., Domingo, G. and Howard, V. A. (2009), “Barriers to Innovation among Spanish Manufacturing SMEs”, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 47, No. 4, October, pp. 465-488.
• Majaro, S. (1988), Managing Ideas for Profit, McGraw-Hill, London.
• March, I., Ganasekaran, A., and Lloria, B. (2002), “Product development process in Spanish SMEs: An empirical research”, Technovation, Vol. 22, pp. 301–312.
• Marshall, A. (1890: 1920), Principles of Economics. 8th Edition. London: Macmillan and Co., Ltd
• Mill. J. S. (1848: 1909), Principles of Political Economy with some of their Applications to Social Philosophy. London; Longmans, Green and Co.
• Mohnen, P. and Röller, L. (2005), “Complementarities in innovation policy”, European Economic Review, Vol. 49, pp. 1431–1450.
• Mohnen, P. and Rosa, J. (1999), “Barriers to Innovation in Service Industries in Canada,Science and Technology Redesign Project”, Research Paper No. 7, Ottawa.
• Mohnen, P. and Rosa, J. (2002). “ Barriers to innovation in service industries in Canada”, In M. Feldman, and N. Massard (Eds.) Institutions and systems in the geography of innovation (pp. 231–250). Boston: Kluwer.
• Mosey, S., Clare, J. and Woodcock, D. (2002), “Innovation decision making in British manufacturing SMEs”, Integrated Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 176-83.
• Muent, H., Pissarides, F. and Sanfey, P. (2001), “Taxes, Competition and Finance for Albanian Enterprises: Evidence from a Field Study”, MOCT-MOST, 11, 2390251.
• Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (1998), Women Entrepreneurs in Small an Medium Enterprises. Paris: OECD.
• Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2003), Managment Training in SMEs: Synthesis Report. Paris: OECD.
• Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2004), Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Turkey: Issues and Policies, Paris: OECD
• Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Leed Programme, International Conference (2009), On SMEs, Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Paris: OECD
• Pack, H. (1992), “New Perspectives on Industrial Growth in Taiwan”, in G Ranis, (eds). Taiwan: From Developing to Mature Economy, Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, pp. 73-120.
• Piatier, A. (1984), Barriers to Innovation. Frances Pinter, London.
• Pissarides, F., Singer M. and Svejnar, J. (2000), “Objectives and constraints of entrepreneurs: Evidence from small and medium-sized enterprises in Russia and Bulgaria”, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Publisher, Place
• Porter, M. (1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Macmillan, London.
• Pyndyck, R. S. and Rubinfeld, D. L. (1991), Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts, 3rd Ed., New York: Mc-Graw Hill, Inc.
• Riding, A. L. and Swift, C. S. (1990), “Women Business Owners and Terms of Credit: Some Empirical Findings of the Canadian Experience”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 5, pp. 327-40.
• Rodrik, D. (1995), “Trade and Industrial Policy Reform”, in J. Brhrman and T. N. Srinivasan, (eds), Handbook of Development Economics, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 2927-82.
• Rothwell R. (1991), “Networking and Innovation In European Manufacturing Firms”, Technovation, Vol. 11, No. 1, 93: 112.
• Rush, H. and Bessant, J. (1992), “Revolution in three-quarter time: lessons from the diffusion of advanced manufacturing technologies”, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management Vol. 4, No. 1: 3–19.
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1911), The Theory of Economic Development. Harvard (reproduced, New York 1961).
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1942), Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers. (Harper Colophon edition, 1976.)
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1951), “Economic Theory and Entrepreneurial History”, in R. V. Clemence (eds), Essays on Economic Topics of Joseph Schumpeter. Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press
• Segarra-Blasco, A., Garcia-Quevedo, J., and Teruel-Carrizosa, M. (2008), “Barriers to innovation and public policy in Catalonia”, International Entrepreneur Management Journal, Vol. 4, pp. 431–451.
• Sener, S., O. Aydın and M. Savrul (2014), “Structure of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Turkey and Global Competitiveness Strategies”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 150:212-221
• Silva, M. and Leitão, J. (2007), “Determinant Factors of Innovation Capability of Portuguese Services Firms: A Logit Model”, proceedings XVII International RESER Conference "Service Competitiveness and Cohesion - Balancing Dynamics in the Knowledge Society", 13-15th September 2007, Tampere Hall, Tampere, Finland
• Smallbone, D. and Welter, F. (2001), “The Distinctiveness of Entrepreneurship in Transition Economies”, Small Business Economics, Vol. 16, pp. 249-62.
• Stewart, F. (1977), Technology and Underdevelopment, London, Macmillan.
• Stoneman, P. (1995), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Storey, D. J. (1994), Understanding the Small Business Sector. London: Routledge.
• Sundbo, J. (1998), The Theory of Innovation: Entrepreneurs, Technology and Strategy. MA: Edward Elgar.
• Teece, D. J. (1996), “Firm organisation, industrial structure, and technological innovation”, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation, Vol. 31, pp. 193-224.
• TESK (2005), www.tesk.org.tr/yayin/vitrin/167/29/html
• Tidd, J., Bessant, J. and Pavitt, K. (2001), Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organisational Change, Wiley, Chichester.
• Tourigny, D. and Le, C. (2004), “Impediments to innovation faced by Canadian manufacturing firms”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 13, pp. 217-250, 2004.
• Utterback, J. M. (1994), Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation. Harvard Business School Press.
• Woodword, R. (2001), “SME support in Post-Communist Countries: Moving from Individual to Co-operative Approaches (Reflections on the Polish Case)’, MOCT-MOST, 11; 275-294.
• Ylinenpää, H. (1998), “Measures to overcome Barriers to Innovation in Sweden”, Paper EFMD European Small Business Seminar in Vienna, 16.09.1998,online: http://www.ies.luth.se/org/Rapporter/AR9826.pdf, last accessed: 21.05.2006
• Zhao, F. (2001), “Managing innovation and quality of collaborative R&D”, Conference Proceedings of 5th International & 8th National Research Conference, Melbourne.