TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP AND INDIVIDUAL CREATIVITY: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF INTRINSIC MOTIVATION
Abstract
Purpose- It is assumed that transformational leadership as an organizational context might have a significant effect on the development of individual creativity capabilities within followers. Further, it is argued that intrinsic motivation mediates the transformational leadership behavior - individual creativity link, which we empirically know little about so far.
Methodology- Given hypothesis were investigated by using 304 questionnaires from 61 manufacturing companies operating in Eastern Marmara region. To more vigorously test the proposed model, partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) was employed with SmartPLS 3.0 statistical program.
Findings- The findings suggest that transformational leadership is an important tool that enhance individual creativity. The SEM results revealed that transformational leadership is positively associated with individual creativity and the effect of transformational leadership on individual creativity is partially mediated by inspirational motivation, which means both of our hypothesis are supported.
Conclusion- According to the findings, transformational leaders provide their followers’ with recognition, provide a vision towards future; they act as role models and promote followers’ commitment. They encourage the followers to take risks, increase their energy to generate novel ideas and solutions. As a result, followers with increased self-confidence become more inspired motivated and creative. Additionally, these followers, through the way that their leaders behave them, are inspired and motivated to be more creative in doing their tasks. Partially through inspirational motivation transformational leaders can stimulate the creative capabilities of followers. Finally, this study reveals the fact that the effect of transformational leadership is partially mediated by inspirational mediation.
Keywords
References
- Akgün, A. E., Keskin, H., Byrne, J. C., & Ilhan, Ö. Ö. (2014), “Complex adaptive system mechanisms, adaptive management practices, and firm product innovativeness”, R&D Management, 44(1), 18-41.
- Amabile, T.M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J. and Herron, M. (1996), “Assessing the work environment for creativity”, Academy of Management Journal, 39 (5), pp.1154–1184.
- Amabile, T.M., Schatzel, E.A., Moneta, G.B. and Kramer, S.J. (2004), “Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: perceived leader support”, Leadership Quarterly, 15 (1), pp.5–32.
- Amabile, T.M. (1983), “The social psychology of creativity”, New York: Springer-Verlag.
- Antonakis, J. and House, R.J. (2002),” The full-range leadership theory: The way forward”. In B.J.Avolio & F.J. Yammarino (Eds.), Transformational and charismatic leadership: the road ahead (pp. 3-34). Amsterdam: JAI.
- Avolio, B.J., Bass, B.M. and Jung, D.I. (1999), “Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72 (4), pp.441–463.
- Baron, R. and Kenny, D. (1986), “The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 6, pp.1173–1182.
- Bass, B.M. (1990), “From transactional to transformational leadership: learning to share the vision”, Organizational Dynamics, 18 (3), pp.19–32.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
September 30, 2017
Submission Date
July 9, 2017
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 2017 Volume: 6 Number: 3