Which is the Better as an Indicator of Environmental Quality: Parmelia sulcata Taylor or Parmelina tiliacea (Hoffm.) Hale

Şaban Güvenç; Aylin Bilgin

Which is the Better as an Indicator of Environmental Quality: Parmelia sulcata Taylor or Parmelina tiliacea (Hoffm.) Hale

Abstract

In this study, the changes in photosynthetic pigment contents of epiphytic foliose lichens Parmelia sulcata and Parmelina tiliacea collected on the trunk of oak trees in each one of four different localities in Bursa Province were investigated. Almost all of the photosynthetic parameters of P. sulcata in all the localities were measured higher than in P. tiliacea. Chlorophyll and carotenoid contents, and phaeophytinization rate measured in thalli of P. sulcata showed significant differences between the localities. Only chlorophyll b/a ratio and phaeophytinization rate in thalli of P. tiliacea was not significant between the localities. Other parameters showed significant differences. The highest photosynthetic pigment contents and ratio for each lichen species was measured in samples collected from 3th locality. The lowest chlorophyll a content and phaeophytinization rate for each lichen species were measured in samples collected from 2nd locality. Compared to variations in the chlorophyll a, total chlorophyll, and total carotenois content for each lichen species between the localities were found statistically significant at level P<0.01. P. sulcata was the better as an indicator of environmental quality than P. tiliacea.

Keywords

Epiphytic lichen, Photosynthetic pigment, Parmelia sulcata, Parmelina tiliacea, Quercus cerris, Bursa

References

Barnes JD, Balaguer L, Manrique E, Elvira S, and Davison AW (1992). A reappraisal of the use of DMSO for the extraction and determination of chlorophylls a and b in lichens and higher plants. Environ Exp Bot, 32: 85– 100.
Carreras HA, and Pignata ML (2001). Comparison among air pollutants, meteorological conditions and some chemical parameters in the transplanted lichen Usnea amblyoclada. Environmental Pollution, 111: 45–52.
Conti ME, and Cecchetti G (2001). Biological monitoring: lichens as bioindicators of air pollution assessment – a review. Environmental Pollution, 114: 471–92.
Dymytrova L (2009). Epiphytic lichens and bryophytes as indicators of air pollution in Kyiv city (Ukraine). Folia Cryptog. Estonica, Fasc. 46: 33–44.
Doğru Z, and Güvenç Ş (2016). Lichenized and lichenicolous fungi of Katırlı mountain in Bursa province. Biological Diversity and Conservation, 9: 40-51.
Garty J, Tamir O, Hassid I, Eshel A, Cohen Y, Karnieli A, and Orlovsky L (2001). Photosynthesis, chlorophyll integrity, and spectral reflectance in lichens exposed to air pollution. Journal of Environmental Quality, 30: 884-893.
Gilbert NL, Woodhouse S, Stieb DM, and Brook JR (2003). Ambient nitrogen dioxide and distance from a major highway. Science of the Total Environment, 312: 43-46.
Giordani P, Brunialti G, and Alleteo D (2002). Effects of atmospheric pollution on lichen biodiversity (LB) in a Mediterranean region (Liguria, northwest Italy). Environmental Pollution, 118: 53–64.
Giordano S, Adamo P, Sorbo S, and Vingiani S (2005). Atmospheric trace metal pollution in the Naples urban area based on results from moss and lichen bags. Environmental Pollution, 136: 431–42.
Gül M, and Güvenç Ş (2016). Lichenized fungi of Karadağ Mountain (Karacabey-Bursa). Journal of Biological & Environmental Sciences (JBES), 10(30): 89-99.

Karakaş VE, Öztürk Ş, and Oran S (2017). Comparison of Photosynthetic Pigment Contents in Lichen Samples were Collected from Different Localities in Bursa. Journal of Biological & Environmental Sciences, 11(33): 121-127.
Lackovicova A, Guttova A, Backor M, Pisut P, and Pisut I (2013). Response of Evernia prunastri to urban environmental conditions in Central Europe after the decrease of air pollution. The Lichenologist, 45(1): 89–100.
Loppi S, Ivanov D, and Boccardi R (2002). Biodiversity of epiphytic lichens and air pollution in the town of Siena (Central Italy). Environmental Pollution, 116: 123–128.
Munzi S, Pirintsos SA, and Loppi S (2009). Chlorophyll degradation and inhibition of polyamine biosynthesis in the lichen Xanthoria parietina under nitrogen stress. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 72: 281– 285.
Nimis PL, Lazzarin G, Lazzarin A, and Skert N (2000). Biomonitoring of trace elements with lichens in Veneto (NE Italy). Sci Total Environ, 255: 97–111.
Nimis PL, and Martellos S (2018). ITALIC - The Information System on Italian Lichens, Version 5.0. University of Trieste, Dept. of Biology. Website: (http://dryades.units.it/italic) [accessed on February 20, 2018].
Paoli L, Pisani T, Munzi S, Gaggi C, and Loppi S (2010). Influence of sun irradiance and water availability on lichen photosynthetic pigments during a Mediterranean summer. Biologia, 65: 776–783.
Paoli L, Pisani T, Guttova A, Sardella G, and Loppi S (2011). Physiological and chemical response of lichens transplanted in and around an industrial area of south Italy: relationship with the lichen diversity. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 74: 650–657.
Pinho P, Augusto S, Branquinho C, Bio A, Pereira MJ, Soares A, and Catarino F (2004). Mapping lichen diversity as a first step for air quality assessment. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, 49: 377–389.
Pirintsos S, Paoli L, Loppi S, and Kotzabasis K (2011). Photosynthetic performance of lichen transplants as early indicator of climatic stress along an altitudinal gradient in the arid Mediterranean area. Climatic Change, 107: 305–328.
Öztürk MZ (2010). Comparative climate of Uludağ (Zirve) and Bursa Meteorology Stations. Türk Coğrafya Dergisi, 55: 13-24.
Ra HSY, Geiser LH, and Crang RFE (2005). Effects of season and low-level air pollution on physiology and element content of lichens from the U.S. Pacific Northwest. Sci. Total Environ., 343(1-3): 155-167.
Riddell J, Padgett PE, and Nash III TH (2012). Physiological responses of lichens to factorial fumigations with nitric acid and ozone. Environmental Pollution, 170: 202-210.
Ronen R, and Galun M (1984). Pigment extraction from lichens with dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and estimation of chlorophyll degradation. Environ Exp Bot, 24: 239– 45.
Seed L, Wolseley P, Gosling L, Davies L, and Power SA (2013). Modelling relationships between lichen bioindicators, air quality and climate on a national scale: Results from the UK OPAL air survey. Environmental Pollution, 182: 437-447.
Stamenković S, Cvijan M, and Arandjelivić M (2010). Lichens as bioindicators of air quality in Dimitrograd (South-Easten Serbia). Arch. Biol. Sci., Belgrade, 62 (3):643-648.
Sujetoviene G, and Galinyte V (2016). Effects of the urban environmental conditions on the physiology of lichen and moss. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 7: 611-618.
TSMS (2013). Climate data of Bandırma, Mudanya and Karacabey (Period of 1987-2012). Turkish State Meteorological Service (TSMS), Ankara.
Wellburn AR (1994). The spectral determination of chlorophylls a and b as well as total carotenoids using various solvents with spectrophotometers of different resolution. J Plant Physiol, 144: 307– 13.
von Arb C, Mueller C, Ammann K, and Brunold C (1990). Lichen Physiology and Air Pollution. II. Statistical Analysis of the Correlation between SO2, NO2, NO and O3, and Chlorophyll Content, Net Photosynthesis, Sulphate Uptake and Protein Synthesis of Parmelia sulcata Taylor. The New Phytologist, 115(3): 431-437.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Agricultural Biotechnology (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Şaban Güvenç ^*
Türkiye

Aylin Bilgin
Türkiye

Publication Date

May 25, 2018

Submission Date

March 1, 2018

Acceptance Date

April 20, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 12 Number: 34

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA58JN27SG

APA

Güvenç, Ş., & Bilgin, A. (2018). Which is the Better as an Indicator of Environmental Quality: Parmelia sulcata Taylor or Parmelina tiliacea (Hoffm.) Hale. Journal of Biological and Environmental Sciences, 12(34), 1-6. https://izlik.org/JA58JN27SG

AMA

1.Güvenç Ş, Bilgin A. Which is the Better as an Indicator of Environmental Quality: Parmelia sulcata Taylor or Parmelina tiliacea (Hoffm.) Hale. JBES. 2018;12(34):1-6. https://izlik.org/JA58JN27SG

Chicago

Güvenç, Şaban, and Aylin Bilgin. 2018. “Which Is the Better As an Indicator of Environmental Quality: Parmelia Sulcata Taylor or Parmelina Tiliacea (Hoffm.) Hale”. Journal of Biological and Environmental Sciences 12 (34): 1-6. https://izlik.org/JA58JN27SG.

EndNote

Güvenç Ş, Bilgin A (May 1, 2018) Which is the Better as an Indicator of Environmental Quality: Parmelia sulcata Taylor or Parmelina tiliacea (Hoffm.) Hale. Journal of Biological and Environmental Sciences 12 34 1–6.

IEEE

[1]Ş. Güvenç and A. Bilgin, “Which is the Better as an Indicator of Environmental Quality: Parmelia sulcata Taylor or Parmelina tiliacea (Hoffm.) Hale”, JBES, vol. 12, no. 34, pp. 1–6, May 2018, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA58JN27SG

ISNAD

Güvenç, Şaban - Bilgin, Aylin. “Which Is the Better As an Indicator of Environmental Quality: Parmelia Sulcata Taylor or Parmelina Tiliacea (Hoffm.) Hale”. Journal of Biological and Environmental Sciences 12/34 (May 1, 2018): 1-6. https://izlik.org/JA58JN27SG.

JAMA

1.Güvenç Ş, Bilgin A. Which is the Better as an Indicator of Environmental Quality: Parmelia sulcata Taylor or Parmelina tiliacea (Hoffm.) Hale. JBES. 2018;12:1–6.

MLA

Güvenç, Şaban, and Aylin Bilgin. “Which Is the Better As an Indicator of Environmental Quality: Parmelia Sulcata Taylor or Parmelina Tiliacea (Hoffm.) Hale”. Journal of Biological and Environmental Sciences, vol. 12, no. 34, May 2018, pp. 1-6, https://izlik.org/JA58JN27SG.

Vancouver

1.Şaban Güvenç, Aylin Bilgin. Which is the Better as an Indicator of Environmental Quality: Parmelia sulcata Taylor or Parmelina tiliacea (Hoffm.) Hale. JBES [Internet]. 2018 May 1;12(34):1-6. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA58JN27SG

Journal of Biological and Environmental Sciences is the official journal of Bursa Uludag University

Bursa Uludag University, Gorukle Campus, 16059, Bursa, Türkiye.