Research Article

The Effect of Plant Density and Irrigation Regime on Net Income of Sweet Corn

Volume: 16 Number: 46 November 19, 2022

The Effect of Plant Density and Irrigation Regime on Net Income of Sweet Corn

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the effect of two plant density (low: 57000 and high: 95000 plant ha-1) and three irrigation levels (all of the water evaporated from a class A pan (Epan): 3/3 Epan, 2/3 Epan, and 1/3 Epan) on the net income of sweet corn. Field experiments were carried out with the Challenger F1 sweet corn (Zea mays saccharata Sturt) variety in Bursa conditions in the Marmara region of Turkey in 2017. As a result of study, the amount of irrigation water applied to the experimental treatments via a drip irrigation system varied between 148 and 444 mm. Relatively higher average fresh ear yield (20.76 t ha-1) was obtained at high plant density under different irrigation levels. On the other hand, the average yield of 3/3 Epan irrigation treatment (22.59 t ha-1) under different plant density was found to be statistically higher (P<0.05) compared to other irrigation levels. With the decrease in irrigation level, the fresh ear yield also decreased. The total production costs, including the application of water by drip irrigation system were determined to vary between 2743 and 3000 US$ ha-1. The highest net income per unit area was obtained from the treatment 3/3 Epan irrigation at high plant density with 1846 US$ ha-1, followed by the treatment 2/3 Epan. Net income per unit area at low plant density ranged from 350 to 1292 US$ ha-1. The decrease in the irrigation level decreased the income per unit area. The net income values obtained in return for the unit irrigation water amount were determined as the lowest being 0.24 US$ m-3 for 1/3 Epan irrigation treatment and low plant density, while the highest was determined as 0.50 US$ m-3 for 2/3 Epan irrigation treatment and high plant density. According to the results obtained from the experiment, under 95000 plant ha-1 when there is a land restriction, the irrigation regime in which all the evaporated water from the A class pan is taken as a reference, and in the areas with irrigation water restriction, 2/3 Epan irrigation regime can be recommended.

Keywords

Drip irrigation, Net return, Water productivity

References

  1. Akman, Z. 2015. Şeker mısır. Ayrıntı Dergisi, 3(24): 44-47.
  2. Arıcan, B., Kale, S. 2016. Farklı sulama suyu tuzluluğu koşullarında değişik hidrojel dozlarının şeker mısır (Zea mays) verimine olan etkileri. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(1): 8-16.
  3. Çamoğlu, G., Genç, L., Aşık, Ş., 2011. Tatlı mısırda (Zea mays saccharata Sturt) su stresinin fizyolojik ve morfolojik parametreler üzerine etkisi. Ege Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Derg., 48(2): 141-149.
  4. Çetinkol, M. 1989. Tatlı mısır üretimi. Hasad Aylık Tarım ve Hayvancılık Dergisi, 4(46): 20-23.
  5. Demir, A.O., Göksoy, A.T., Büyükcangaz H., Turan, Z.M., Köksal, E.S. 2006. Deficit Irrigation of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) in a sub–humid climate. Irrigation Science, 24: 279–289.
  6. El-Hendawy, S.E., El-Lattief, E.A.A., Ahmed, M.S., Schmidhalter, U. 2008. Irrigation rate and plant density effects on yield and water use efficiency of drip-irrigated corn. Agricultural Water Management, 95(7): 836-844.
  7. English, M., Musick, J.T. Murty, V.V.N. 1992. Deficit irrigation. management of irrigation systems. Edited by G.J. Hoffmann, T.A. Hawell and K.H. Solomon. ASAE Monograph Number 9, St. Joseph, Michigan, p. 629-663.
  8. Fereres, E., Soriano, M.A. 2007. Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use. Journal of Experimental Botany, 58(2): 147–159.
  9. Gündüz, M., Beyazgül, M. 1998. Balıkesir koşullarında mısırın su-verim ilişkileri. KHGM Menemen Araştırma Ens. Müd. Yayınları, İzmir.
  10. James, A.A. 1994. Soil moisture deficits, yield and seed quality of two maize hybrids differing in drought tolerance. MS thesis (unpublished), Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa. 186 p
APA
Kuşçu, H., Seçme, H., & Chote, B. H. (2022). The Effect of Plant Density and Irrigation Regime on Net Income of Sweet Corn. Journal of Biological and Environmental Sciences, 16(46), 1-7. https://izlik.org/JA46XE62HU
AMA
1.Kuşçu H, Seçme H, Chote BH. The Effect of Plant Density and Irrigation Regime on Net Income of Sweet Corn. JBES. 2022;16(46):1-7. https://izlik.org/JA46XE62HU
Chicago
Kuşçu, Hayrettin, Halis Seçme, and Barke Hussein Chote. 2022. “The Effect of Plant Density and Irrigation Regime on Net Income of Sweet Corn”. Journal of Biological and Environmental Sciences 16 (46): 1-7. https://izlik.org/JA46XE62HU.
EndNote
Kuşçu H, Seçme H, Chote BH (November 1, 2022) The Effect of Plant Density and Irrigation Regime on Net Income of Sweet Corn. Journal of Biological and Environmental Sciences 16 46 1–7.
IEEE
[1]H. Kuşçu, H. Seçme, and B. H. Chote, “The Effect of Plant Density and Irrigation Regime on Net Income of Sweet Corn”, JBES, vol. 16, no. 46, pp. 1–7, Nov. 2022, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA46XE62HU
ISNAD
Kuşçu, Hayrettin - Seçme, Halis - Chote, Barke Hussein. “The Effect of Plant Density and Irrigation Regime on Net Income of Sweet Corn”. Journal of Biological and Environmental Sciences 16/46 (November 1, 2022): 1-7. https://izlik.org/JA46XE62HU.
JAMA
1.Kuşçu H, Seçme H, Chote BH. The Effect of Plant Density and Irrigation Regime on Net Income of Sweet Corn. JBES. 2022;16:1–7.
MLA
Kuşçu, Hayrettin, et al. “The Effect of Plant Density and Irrigation Regime on Net Income of Sweet Corn”. Journal of Biological and Environmental Sciences, vol. 16, no. 46, Nov. 2022, pp. 1-7, https://izlik.org/JA46XE62HU.
Vancouver
1.Hayrettin Kuşçu, Halis Seçme, Barke Hussein Chote. The Effect of Plant Density and Irrigation Regime on Net Income of Sweet Corn. JBES [Internet]. 2022 Nov. 1;16(46):1-7. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA46XE62HU