Knowledge Sharing Behaviour by Librarians in Federal Universities in Nigeria

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 20 - 33, 30.11.2019

Thomas Ogunmodede Sunday Popoola

Öz

The ongoing debate in the international community’s is on the evaluation of knowledge sharing and its impact on organisational effectiveness. Librarians play a pivotal role in helping the university to realise the objective of teaching, learning and research. Librarians provide access to information resources and services to support the vision and mission of their parent institution. Knowledge are being created daily in organisation, hence, they should be shared. Although, there have been researches on knowledge sharing by librarians in Nigeria but the focus have always been on sectional part or on one or two geo-political zones, without national study as scope of study. This study therefore investigated knowledge sharing by librarians in federal universities in Nigeria. The population of study comprised 654 librarians from 40 federal universities in Nigeria. A total enumeration technique was used to cover 654 librarians. The descriptive statistics was employed for data analysis. 518 respondents filled and returned the questionnaire, given a response rate of 79.2%.  The results revealed that the level of knowledge sharing by librarians is high ( =98.47. SD =11.54). The channel of knowledge sharing by librarians varies significantly from face-to-face to the use of social media. Significant difference exists on knowledge sharing by librarians based on the universities. The study concludes that librarians are not only knowledge managers but also knowledge disseminators. Therefore, library administrators should establish as well as formalised knowledge sharing hours in the library so that the culture of knowledge sharing can be maintained among the librarians. Recognition and incentives be given to librarians who share knowledge so that they can share more knowledge.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Knowledge sharing, Channels, Levels, Librarians, University libraries

Kaynakça

• Akparobore, D. (2015). Knowledge sharing among librarians in university libraries in Nigeria. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 5(2), 31-35.
• Anna, N. O. V., & Puspitasari, D. (2013). Knowledge sharing in libraries: A case study of knowledge management strategies in Indonesian university libraries. IFLA WLIC, 2013, Singapore.
• Apolinario, R. R., Eclevia, M. R., Eclevia, C. L., Lagrama, E. R., & Sagun, K. K. A. (2014). Librarian as researcher and knowledge creator: Examining librarian’s involvement, perceived capabilities and confidence. IFLA, 2014, Lyon.
• Boateng, H., Agyemang, F. G., Okoe A. F., & Meusah T. D. (2017). Examining the relationship between trustworthiness and students’ attitude towards knowledge sharing, Library Review, 66(1-2), 16-27.
• Cyr, S., & Choo, C. W. (2010). The individual and social dynamics of knowledge sharing: an exploratory study. Journal of Documentation, 66(6), 824-846.
• Danciu, E., & Grosseck, G. (2011). Social aspects of Web 2.0 technologies: teaching or teachers’ challenges, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3768-3773.
• Decker, E. N. (2014). Using blogs in the library to reach diverse and Non-Traditional student Groups. Journal of Library Innovation, 5(2), 60-70.
• DiNucci, D. (1999). Fragmented future. Retrieved from http://darcyd.com/fragmented_future.pdf
• Eze, M. E. (2016). Awareness and use of Web 2.0 tools by LIS Students at University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu State, Nigeria. Retrieved on Jun. 3, 2016 from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1355
• Fari, S. A. (2015). Influence of knowledge sharing on academics in selected universities in Africa. The Information Technologist: An International Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 12(2), 161-171.
• Ford, D. P., & Staples, S. (2010). Are full and partial knowledge sharing the same, Journal of Knowledge Management,14(3), 394-409.
• Graham, P. (2005). ‘Web 2.0: Want to start a startup. Retrieved from http://www.paulgraham.com/web20.html
• Hislop, S. (2005). The effect of network size on intra-network knowledge processes. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 3, 244-252.
• Hislop, D. (2013). Knowledge management in organisations: A critical introduction. 3rd Ed. UK: Oxford University Press.
• Ilako, C., & Ikoja –Odongo, R. (2011). Creativity and innovations in Ugandan libraries: case of Makerere University Library. IFLA 2011, 13-18 Aug 2011, San Juan, Puerto Rico. Retrieved from http://conference.ifla.org/ifla77
• Jia, F., SougGen, J., & Shi, Y. (2012). The application of socialisation, externalisation combination internalisation model in library knowledge management. International conference on Mechanical Engineering and Automation (ICMEA, 2012). Advances in Biomedical Engineering, 10, 359-363.
• Laukes, R. D., Silverstein, J., Nicholson, S., & Marshall, T. (2007). Participatory Network: The library as conversation. Information Research, 1-15. Retrieved from http://www.daviddlaukes.org
• Nonaka, I. (1994). The dynamic theory of organisational knowledge creation. Organisation Science, 5(1), 14-37.
• O’ Dell, C., & Hubert, C. (2012). The new edge in knowledge: How knowledge management is changing the way we do business. Journal of Education and Vocational Research, 3(7), 242-243.
• Okonedo, S., & Popoola, S. O. (2012). Effect of self-concept, knowledge sharing and utilization on research productivity among librarians in public universities in South-west Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice e-journal. Retrieved on April 27, 2014 from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/322
• Onifade F. N. (2015). Knowledge sharing among librarians in Federal University Libraries in Nigeria. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 5(3), 91-97
• Opeke, O. R., & Opele, J. K. (2014). Assessment of knowledge sharing behaviours of postgraduate students in selected Nigerian universities. Information and Knowledge Management, 4(11), 102-106.
• Parekh, R. A. (2009). Knowledge Sharing: Collaboration between Universities and Industrial Organisations.
• Parirokh, M. (2008). How implementation of knowledge management can make a difference in libraries: A case study of KM practice in Astan Quds library organisation. World congress of Muslim librarian & information Scientists. 25th-27th Nov. 2008 Putra World Trade Center.
• Pasher, E., & Ronen, T. (2011). The complete guide to knowledge management: A strategic plan to leverage your company’s intellectual capital. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken.
• Pearisasamy, T. (2009). The study of the influence of performance reward on knowledge sharing factors, barriers and recommendations. Retrieved on August 10, 2015 from http:www.fppsm.utm.my/files/journal/Jk07/706.pdf
• Saha, T. (2015). Application of knowledge management in modern academic libraries. International Journal of Art, Humanities and Management Studies, 1(7), 27-34
• Sánchez, J. H., Sánchez, Y. H., Collado-Ruiz, D., & Cebrián-Tarrasón, D. (2013). Knowledge creating and sharing corporate culture framework. Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, 74, 388-397.
• Sharma, P. (2008). Characteristics of Web 2.0 technology. Retrieved from http://www.techpluto.com/web-20-services/
• Tan, N. L., Lye, Y. H., Ng, T. H., & Lim, Y. S. (2010). Motivational factors in influencing knowledge sharing among banks in Malaysia. International Research Journal of Financial and Economics, 44, 191-201
• Yang, J. (2004). Job related knowledge sharing, comparative case study. Journals of Knowledge Management, 8(3), 118-126.