TARIM TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ RİSKLERİNİN AZALTILMASINDA PROAKTİF RİSK YÖNETİMİ YAKLAŞIMI

Year 2020, , 274 - 286, 30.09.2020

Pinar Demır , Nilgun Kayalı

https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2020.1294

Abstract

Amaç- Çalışmanın amacı; dünya ekonomisinin temel bir parçası olan tarım sektörünün, tedarik zinciri faaliyetleri sırasında karşı karşıya kaldığı risk faktörlerini analiz eden bir model sunmaktır.
Yöntem- Bu çalışmada, tarım tedarik zincirinde ortaya çıkabilecek risklerin yönetilmesi için sistematik bir risk yönetim modeli (Avustralya ve Yeni Zelanda Standardı AS / NZS4360:2004) önerilmiştir. Önerilen model, tarım sektöründe faaliyet gösteren, çokuluslu bir firmada uygulanarak, firmanın tedarik zinciri risklerinin sistematik bir şekilde izlenmesine ve yönetilmesine imkân veren bir yol haritası geliştirilmiştir. Bu kapsamda; bir organizasyon içinde tarım şirketleri için iş kesintisi ve kayba neden olabilecek risklerin, olasılığını ve sonuçlarının etkisini incelemek amacıyla risk matrisi yöntemi kullanılmıştır.
Bulgular- Çalışma kapsamında, tespit edilen riskler; çevresel risk, tedarik riski, operasyonel risk, politik risk, örgütsel risk ve finansal risk olmak üzere 6 kategori altında incelenmiştir. Araştırmanın bulgularına dayanarak, sekiz risk en önemli, yedi risk orta derece önemli ve altı risk ise diğer risklere göre önemi daha az bulunmuştur.
Sonuç- Yapılan analizin sonucunda ürün kalitesi, depolama koşulları, tedarik, iklim ile ilgili değişkenlik ve dış pazarda rekabet etmeyi sınırlandıran ya da engellemeye neden olan ticari kısıtlamaların tarım tedarik zinciri yönetiminde kritik önem taşıdığı sonucuna varılmıştır.

Keywords

Avustralya/Yeni Zelanda Standardı, risk yönetimi, tarımsal tedarik zinciri, tarımsal tedarik zinciri risk yönetimi, risk matrisi

PROACTIVE RISK MANAGEMENT APPROACH IN REDUCING THE AGRICULTURAL SUPPLY CHAIN RISKS

Abstract

Purpose- The purpose of this study is to provide a model that analyzes the risk factors encountered by the agriculture industry, which is an essential part of the global economy, during supply chain activities.
Methodology – In this study, a systematic risk management model (Australia and New Zealand Standard AS / NZS 4360: 2004) is proposed to manage the risks that may arise in the agricultural supply chain. The proposed model was applied in a multinational company operating in the agricultural sector and road map has been developed which allows them to monitor and manage the supply chain risks of the company systematically. Within this scope; the risks in an organization, which may lead to business interruption and losses for agriculture companies, risk matrix method has been used in order to examine their probability and effects of their consequences.
Findings- Within the scope of the study, identified risks were analyzed under six categories; namely environmental risk, supply risk, operational risk, political risk, organizational risk and financial risk. Based on the findings of the study, it is determined that eight risks most important, seven risks moderately important and six risks less important than other risks.
Conclusion- At the end of the analysis, it was concluded that, product quality, storage conditions, supply, climatic instability and commercial restrictions that limit or cause inhibition of competition in the foreign markets had critical importance in agricultural supply chain management.

Keywords

Australia/New Zealand Standards, risk management, agricultural supply chain, agricultural supply chain risk management, risk matrix

References

• A Risk Management Standard. (2002). AIRMIC, ALARM, IRM. 1-14 https://www.theirm.org/media/4709/arms_2002_irm.pdf , (Erişim Tarihi: Mayıs,2020)
• Aksu, B., Sezer, A.D., Yegen, G., Kusçu, L. (2016). QbD implementation in biotechnological product development studies, In: Chen, T., Chai, S. (eds.) Special Topics in Drug Discovery, (1bs). 133–155. InTechOpen.
• Aung, M.M., Chang, Y.S. (2014). Traceability in a food supply chain: safety and quality perspectives. Food Control, 39, 172-184.
• Chen, L., (2018). The risk management of medical device-related pressure ulcers based on the Australian/New Zealand Standard. Journal of Internatioanl Medical Research. Vol.46(10) 4129-4139 doi: 10.1177/0300060518786902
• Christopher, M. (1998). Logistics and supply chain management; strategies for reducing cost and improving services. (2.bs) London: Financial Times Prentice Hall.
• Chopra, S., Meindl, P. (2009). Supply chain management: strategy, planning, and operation. (4.bs.) Prentice Hall.3-21. ISBN:9780136080404.
• Cormican, K. (2014). Integrated enterprise risk management: from process to best practice. Modern Economy, 5, 401-413. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/me.2014.54039
• Dickson, G. C. (1989). Corporate risk management. London: Witherby, for the Institute of Risk Management.
• Dumbrava, V., lacob, V.S. (2013). Using probability -impact matrix in analysis and risk assessment projects. Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology, Romania, (Special Issue), 3 (6) :76-96.
• FAO (2017). The future of food and agriculture: trends and challenges. FAO: Rome, Italy, 2017; ISBN 9789251095515. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i6583e.pdf. (Erişim Tarihi: Mayıs, 2020).
• Handayati, Y., Simatupang, T.M., Perdana, T. (2015). Agri-food supply chain coordination: the state-of-the-art and developments. Logistics Research 8: 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12159-015-0125-4
• Hopkin, P. (2017). Fundamentals of risk management: understanding, evaluating and implementing effective risk management. Kogan Page Publishers. (4.bs). 1-488.
• Katsikas, S. K. (2013). Computer and information security handbook. Risk Management. In: Vacca, John R. (ed.): Waltham, MA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann. (2.bs). 507-527.
• Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk uncertainty and profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company
• Kristina, S., Wijaya, B.M. (2017). Risk management for food and beverage industry using Australia/New Zealand 4360 Standard. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering Philadelphia: IOP Publishing, Inc. 1-11. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/277/1/012025
• Lazzarini, S.G., Chaddad, F.R., Cook, M.L. (2001). Integrating supply chain and network analyses: the study of netchains chain and network science. 1, 7-22. https://doi.org/10.3920/JCNS2001.x002
• Norina, L. V. (2004). Measuring performance of agri-food supply chains. Doctoral Thesis. New Zealand, Massey University.
• Paulson, U. (2005). Developing a supply chain flow risk model. NOFOMA 2005 Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, 9-10.
• Sikdar, P. (2017).” Practitioner’s guide to business impact analysis”, Auerbach Publications. Newyork. doi: 10.1201/9781315187884
• SRA (2016). The society for risk analysis. Risk Tanımı. http://www.sra.org/sites/default/files/pdf/SRA-glossary approved22june2015-x.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: Mayıs, 2020).
• Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand (2004). Risk Management Guidelines Companion to AS/NZS 4360:2004. Sydney. NSW. (Originated as HB 142-1999 and HB 143:1999. Jointly revised and redesignated as HB 436:2004).
• Strasser, G., Lay, R. (1987). Risk management of complex, technology based systems: observations on similarities and differences. Lester B. Lave Plenum Press. 179-188.
• Trienekens, J.H., van der Vorst, J.G.A.J., Verdouw, C.N. (2014). Global food supply chains. in N.K. van Alfen, (ed.) Encyclopedia of Agriculture and Food System. Elsevier pp.499-517
• Van der Vorst, J. G. A. J., Da Silva, C. A., Trienekens, J. H. (2007). Agro-industrial supply chain management: concepts and applications. (Agricultural management, marketing and finance occasional paper; No. 17). Rome, Italy: FAO Agricultural management, Marketing and Finance.
• Waters, D. (2007). Supply chain risk management: vulnerability and resilience in logistics. London: Kogan Page Publishers.
• Woods, E. J. (2004). Supply-chain management: understanding the concept and its implications in developing countries. In: Johnson G.I., Hofman P.J., (Eds). Agriproduct supply-chain management in developing countries. ACIAR Proceedings No.119e, 18-25