Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2017, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 4, 354 - 367, 30.12.2017
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.746

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Atanassov, K. (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets & Systems, 20, 87-96.
  • Biswas, P., Pramanik, S. & Giri, B.C. (2016a). Some Distance Measures of Single Valued Neutrosophic Hesitant Fuzzy Sets and Their Applications to Multiple Attribute Decision Making, In New Trends in Neutrosophic Theory and Applications, F. Smarandache and S. Pramanik (Ed.), Pons Publishing House, Brussels, 27-34.
  • Biswas, P., Pramanik, S. & Giri, B.C. (2016b). TOPSIS method for multi-attribute group decision making under single-valued neutrosophic environment. Neural Computing and Applications, 27(3), 727-737.
  • Chen, S.J. & Hwang, C.L. (1992). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making methods and applications. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  • Derbent, A. (2011). Mobil Yaşam ve Uygulamaları, (Ed. Gonca Telli Yamamoto), MMA Raporu, İstanbul.
  • Hussain, A.N., Mohamed, M., Abdel-Baset, M. & Smarandache, F. (2017). Neutrosophic Linear Programming Problems, In Neutrosophic Operational Research, F. Smarandache, M. Abdel-Baset and Y.Q. Zhou (Ed.), Volume 1, Pons Publishing House, Brussels, 15-27.
  • Kim, G., Sin, B. & Lee, H.G. (2009). Understanding dynamics between initial trust and usage intentions of mobile banking. Information Systems Journal, 19(3), 283-311.
  • Laforet, S. & Li, X. (2005). Consumers’ Attitudes Towards Online and Mobile Banking in China, International Journal of Bank Marketing, 23(5), 362–380.
  • Laukkanen, T.(2007). Internet vs Mobile Banking: Comparing Customer Value Perceptions, Business Process Management Journal, 13(6), 788–797.
  • Lin, H.F. (2013). Determining the relative importance of mobile banking quality factors. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 35, 195-204.
  • Liu, P. & Wang, Y. (2014). Multiple attribute decision-making method based on single-valued neutrosophic normalized weighted Bonferroni mean. Neural Computing and Applications, 25, 2001-2010.
  • Lu, Y., Zhang, L. & Wang, B. (2009). A multidimensional and hierarchical model of mobile service quality. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 8(5), 228-240.
  • Mondal, K., Pramanik, S. & Smarandache, F. (2016). Several Trigonometric Hamming Similarity Measures of Rough Neutrosophic Sets and their Applications in Decision Making, In New Trends in Neutrosophic Theory and Applications, F. Smarandache and S. Pramanik (Ed.), Pons Publishing House, Brussels, 93-103.
  • Nirmal, N.P. & Bhatt, M.G. (2016). Selection of Automated Guided Vehicle Using Single Valued Neutrosophic Entropy Based Novel MultiAttribute Decision Making, In New Trends in Neutrosophic Theory and Applications, F. Smarandache and S. Pramanik (Ed.), Pons Publishing House, Brussels, 105-114.
  • Padmanaban, K. & Joseph, T. (2014). Factors influencing customers’ adoption of mobile banking services: An exploratory study. International Journal of Research in Commerce & Management, 5(12), 60-64.
  • Rao, R.V. (2007). Decision making in the manufacturing environment using graph theory and fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. London: Springer-Verlag.
  • Rao, R.V. & Parnichkun, M. (2009). Flexible manufacturing system selection using a combinatorial mathematics-based decision-making method. International Journal of Production Research, 47(24), 6981-6998.
  • Smarandache, F. (1998). A unifying field in logics, neutrosophy: neutrosophic probability, set and logic. American Research Press, Rehoboth.
  • Şahin, R. & Yiğider, M. (20). A Multi-criteria neutrosophic group decision-making method based TOPSIS for supplier selection, arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.5077.
  • Tan, F.B. & Chou, J.P.C. (2008). The relationship between mobile service quality, perceived technology compatibility, and users’ perceived playfulness in the context of mobile information and entertainment services. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 24(7), 649-671.
  • Wang, H., Smarandache, F., Zhang, Y.Q. & Sunderraman, R. (2010). Single-valued neutrosophic sets. Multispace and Multistructure, 4, 410413.
  • Wang, J. & Zhang, Z. (2009). Multi-criteria decision-making method with incomplete certain information based on intuitionistic fuzzy number. Control and Decision, 24(2), 226-230.
  • Yu, T.K. & Fang, K. (2009). Measuring the post-adoption customer perceptions of mobile banking services. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(1), 33-35.
  • Zadeh, L.A. (1965). Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control, 8, 338-353.
  • Zhuo, Q.Y. & Li, Y. (2010). Chinese mobile banking service evaluation based on AHP method. International Conference on E-Product, EService and E-Entertainment (ICEEE), 1-5.
  • Zhou, T. (2012). Understanding users’ initial trust in mobile banking: An elaboration likelihood perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1518-1525. https://www.tbb.org.tr/en/banks-and-banking-sector-information/statistical-reports/20 (Accessed: 04.10.2017) https://www.tbb.org.tr/tr/internet and mobile banking statistics/3635 (Accessed: 05.10.2017)

ANALYZING MOBILE BANKING QUALITY FACTORS UNDER NEUTROSOPHIC SET PERSPECTIVE: A CASE STUDY OF TURKEY

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 4, 354 - 367, 30.12.2017
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.746

Öz

Purpose
-  
Mobile banking, also known as
m-banking, provides low cost, innovative and easily accessible services to
customers with technological developments as compared to retail banking. In
this context, m-banking quality factors of the banks are considered to be
important issues for customers. The aim of this study is to analyze the
m-banking quality factors and to rank banks offering this service in Turkey
under incomplete, inconsistent and indeterminate information.
   

Methodology
-  
First linguistic expressions
of experts are converted to crisp values via approximation approach proposed by
Chen and Hwang. Then, the Single Valued Neutrosophic Set (SVNS) based entropy,
which deals with incomplete, indeterminate and inconsistent environment better
than fuzzy set, is used to rank the banks providing m-banking services in
Turkey.

Findings- Findings
show that the Denizbank has the best performance in m-banking applications
followed by TEB and ING. Additionally, in terms of entropy weights, response
time was found to be the most important criterion followed by accessibility,
accuracy and trust. Conclusion- Banks
could consider the criteria of response time, accessibility, accuracy and trust
for improving the performance in mbanking services implementation.

Kaynakça

  • Atanassov, K. (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets & Systems, 20, 87-96.
  • Biswas, P., Pramanik, S. & Giri, B.C. (2016a). Some Distance Measures of Single Valued Neutrosophic Hesitant Fuzzy Sets and Their Applications to Multiple Attribute Decision Making, In New Trends in Neutrosophic Theory and Applications, F. Smarandache and S. Pramanik (Ed.), Pons Publishing House, Brussels, 27-34.
  • Biswas, P., Pramanik, S. & Giri, B.C. (2016b). TOPSIS method for multi-attribute group decision making under single-valued neutrosophic environment. Neural Computing and Applications, 27(3), 727-737.
  • Chen, S.J. & Hwang, C.L. (1992). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making methods and applications. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  • Derbent, A. (2011). Mobil Yaşam ve Uygulamaları, (Ed. Gonca Telli Yamamoto), MMA Raporu, İstanbul.
  • Hussain, A.N., Mohamed, M., Abdel-Baset, M. & Smarandache, F. (2017). Neutrosophic Linear Programming Problems, In Neutrosophic Operational Research, F. Smarandache, M. Abdel-Baset and Y.Q. Zhou (Ed.), Volume 1, Pons Publishing House, Brussels, 15-27.
  • Kim, G., Sin, B. & Lee, H.G. (2009). Understanding dynamics between initial trust and usage intentions of mobile banking. Information Systems Journal, 19(3), 283-311.
  • Laforet, S. & Li, X. (2005). Consumers’ Attitudes Towards Online and Mobile Banking in China, International Journal of Bank Marketing, 23(5), 362–380.
  • Laukkanen, T.(2007). Internet vs Mobile Banking: Comparing Customer Value Perceptions, Business Process Management Journal, 13(6), 788–797.
  • Lin, H.F. (2013). Determining the relative importance of mobile banking quality factors. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 35, 195-204.
  • Liu, P. & Wang, Y. (2014). Multiple attribute decision-making method based on single-valued neutrosophic normalized weighted Bonferroni mean. Neural Computing and Applications, 25, 2001-2010.
  • Lu, Y., Zhang, L. & Wang, B. (2009). A multidimensional and hierarchical model of mobile service quality. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 8(5), 228-240.
  • Mondal, K., Pramanik, S. & Smarandache, F. (2016). Several Trigonometric Hamming Similarity Measures of Rough Neutrosophic Sets and their Applications in Decision Making, In New Trends in Neutrosophic Theory and Applications, F. Smarandache and S. Pramanik (Ed.), Pons Publishing House, Brussels, 93-103.
  • Nirmal, N.P. & Bhatt, M.G. (2016). Selection of Automated Guided Vehicle Using Single Valued Neutrosophic Entropy Based Novel MultiAttribute Decision Making, In New Trends in Neutrosophic Theory and Applications, F. Smarandache and S. Pramanik (Ed.), Pons Publishing House, Brussels, 105-114.
  • Padmanaban, K. & Joseph, T. (2014). Factors influencing customers’ adoption of mobile banking services: An exploratory study. International Journal of Research in Commerce & Management, 5(12), 60-64.
  • Rao, R.V. (2007). Decision making in the manufacturing environment using graph theory and fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. London: Springer-Verlag.
  • Rao, R.V. & Parnichkun, M. (2009). Flexible manufacturing system selection using a combinatorial mathematics-based decision-making method. International Journal of Production Research, 47(24), 6981-6998.
  • Smarandache, F. (1998). A unifying field in logics, neutrosophy: neutrosophic probability, set and logic. American Research Press, Rehoboth.
  • Şahin, R. & Yiğider, M. (20). A Multi-criteria neutrosophic group decision-making method based TOPSIS for supplier selection, arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.5077.
  • Tan, F.B. & Chou, J.P.C. (2008). The relationship between mobile service quality, perceived technology compatibility, and users’ perceived playfulness in the context of mobile information and entertainment services. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 24(7), 649-671.
  • Wang, H., Smarandache, F., Zhang, Y.Q. & Sunderraman, R. (2010). Single-valued neutrosophic sets. Multispace and Multistructure, 4, 410413.
  • Wang, J. & Zhang, Z. (2009). Multi-criteria decision-making method with incomplete certain information based on intuitionistic fuzzy number. Control and Decision, 24(2), 226-230.
  • Yu, T.K. & Fang, K. (2009). Measuring the post-adoption customer perceptions of mobile banking services. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(1), 33-35.
  • Zadeh, L.A. (1965). Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control, 8, 338-353.
  • Zhuo, Q.Y. & Li, Y. (2010). Chinese mobile banking service evaluation based on AHP method. International Conference on E-Product, EService and E-Entertainment (ICEEE), 1-5.
  • Zhou, T. (2012). Understanding users’ initial trust in mobile banking: An elaboration likelihood perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1518-1525. https://www.tbb.org.tr/en/banks-and-banking-sector-information/statistical-reports/20 (Accessed: 04.10.2017) https://www.tbb.org.tr/tr/internet and mobile banking statistics/3635 (Accessed: 05.10.2017)
Toplam 26 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Bölüm Articles
Yazarlar

Serpil Altinirmak

Basil Okoth Bu kişi benim

Mustafa Ergün

Caglar Karamasa Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Aralık 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2017 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA Altinirmak, S., Okoth, B., Ergün, M., Karamasa, C. (2017). ANALYZING MOBILE BANKING QUALITY FACTORS UNDER NEUTROSOPHIC SET PERSPECTIVE: A CASE STUDY OF TURKEY. Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting, 4(4), 354-367. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.746

Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting (JEFA) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages of the Journal are English and Turkish. JEFA aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in the area of economics, finance, accounting and auditing. The editor in chief of JEFA invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JEFA publishes academic research studies only. JEFA charges no submission or publication fee.

Ethics Policy - JEFA applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JEFA is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract and method).

Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.