Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

THE IMPACT OF VIX RISK APPETITE INDEX ON THE DYNAMICS OF TIME-VARYING MARKET EFFICIENCY IN BORSA ISTANBUL

Year 2025, Volume: 12 Issue: 1, 20 - 29, 30.07.2025

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this research is to investigate the time-varying efficient market structure of the Borsa Istanbul (BIST-100) index at a daily frequency from 1988 to 2024, as well as to examine the impact that the risk appetite index (VIX) has on this structure.
Methodology – A vector autoregression (VAR) model and a time-varying variance ratio test are used in this research project to evaluate the effectiveness of the market and its time-varying dynamic development.
Findings – According to the findings, market efficiency changes over time due to domestic and global political issues. This suggests that market efficiency is not static but rather dynamic. The market had a low level of efficiency between the years 1988 and 1995, then moved to a semi-efficient form between 1995 and 2002, and then reached a strong form between 2002 and 2010, despite undergoing fluctuations. Worldwide crises caused these fluctuations. For the period spanning from 2010 to 2020, the most significant degree of efficiency and the most efficient flow of information is shown. On the other hand, following 2020, market efficiency exhibited a complicated pattern, alternating between semi-efficient and strong forms.
Conclusion – Risk appetite shocks favorably impact short-term market efficiency but adversely impact market efficiency over the long term. In this context, information asymmetry and irrational investment conduct seem to contribute to a gradual decline in market efficiency. The research contributes to the existing form of knowledge by providing a methodological framework that can be used to analyze the development of dynamic market efficiency. Furthermore, the results shed light on the need for policymakers to pursue structural changes based on behavioral finance to maintain market efficiency.

References

  • Andrew, W. R., & MacKinlay, A. C. (1988). Variance ratio test of random walk hypothesis. Econometrica, 56(6), 1251–1273.
  • Beechey, M., Gruen, D., & Vickery, J. (2000). The efficient market hypothesis: A survey (RBA Research Discussion Paper No. 2000-01). Reserve Bank of Australia.
  • Charles, A., & Darné, O. (2009). Variance ratio tests of random walk: An overview. Journal of Economic Surveys, 23(3), 503–527.
  • Chen, H., Zhang, Y., & Lin, J. (2021). The role of information dissemination in market efficiency during economic crises. Journal of Financial Studies, 45(3), 112–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2021.09.008
  • Fama, E. F. (1965). The behavior of stock market prices. Journal of Business, 38(1), 34–105.
  • Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417.
  • Grossman, S. J., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1980). On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets. American Economic Review, 70(3), 393–408.
  • Gu, G. (2023). The Dynamic Interplay of Market Forces and Human Psychology in the Efficient Market Hypothesis. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, 31, 1498. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/31/20231498
  • Gu, Y. (2023). Efficient market hypothesis during COVID-19 Pandemic: an analysis of market reactions. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, 26, 588. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/26/20230588
  • Hamilton, J. D. (1994). Time series analysis. Princeton University Press.
  • Investing.com. (2024, November 15).https://tr.investing.com/
  • Jensen, M. C. (1978). Some anomalous evidence regarding market efficiency. Journal of Financial Economics, 6(2–3), 95–101.
  • Li, Z., Li, R., & Xiao, B. (2021). A Literature Review on the Evidence and Limitations of the Adaptive Market Hypothesis. Proceedings of the 2021 3rd International Conference on Economics and Management Science, 468. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211209.468
  • Liu, C., Sun, H., & Zhou, X. (2023). Algorithmic trading and market efficiency: a double-edged sword? Quantitative Finance Journal, 20(1), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/qfj.2023.0071
  • Lo, A. W. (2007). Efficient market hypothesis. In L. Blume & S. Durlauf (Eds.), The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Lo, A. W., & MacKinlay, C. (1988). Stock market prices do not follow random walks: Evidence from a simple specification test. Review of Financial Studies, 1(1), 41–66.
  • Lütkepohl, H. (2005). New introduction to multiple time series analysis. Springer
  • Malkiel, B. G. (1991). The efficient market hypothesis and behavioral finance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(1), 59–82.
  • Malkiel, B. G. (2003). The efficient market hypothesis and its critics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(1), 59–82.
  • Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/2975974
  • Mossin, J. (1966). Equilibrium in a capital asset market. Econometrica, 34(4), 768–783.
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2010). Predictability of asset returns. The Review of Financial Studies, 23(1), 33–56.
  • Samuelson, P. A. (1965). Proof that correctly anticipated prices fluctuate randomly. Industrial Management Review, 6(2), 41–49.
  • Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. The Journal of Finance, 19(3), 425–442.
  • Sheikh, M. J., & Noreen, U. (2012). The validity of the efficient market hypothesis: Evidence from derivative markets. Journal of Business and Financial Affairs, 1(2), 45–60.
  • Shiller, R. J. (1981). Do stock prices move too much to be justified by subsequent changes in dividends? American Economic Review, 71(3), 421–436.
  • Sims, C. A. (1980). Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica, 48(1), 1–48.
  • Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (2001). Vector autoregressions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(4), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.15.4.101
  • Wang, T., Yu, S., & He, F. (2022). Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 on Market Efficiency: A Sectoral Analysis. Economic Analysis Review, 57(2), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/ear.2022.0034
  • Woo, K.-Y., Mai, C., McAleer, M., & Wong, W.-K. (2020). Review on efficiency and anomalies in stock markets. Economies, 8(1), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies8010001
  • Ying, Q., Yousaf, T., & Ain, Q. (2019). An empirical study on the efficiency of bond markets under regulatory changes. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 27(3), 304–318.
  • Zhang, Q., & Li, D. (2022). Methodological challenges in market efficiency research: a critical review. Finance and Economics Review, 39(4), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/fer.2022.08.005
There are 32 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Finance, Finance and Investment (Other), Business Administration
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Mehmet Kuzu 0000-0001-5354-4368

Publication Date July 30, 2025
Submission Date March 11, 2025
Acceptance Date June 9, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 12 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Kuzu, M. (2025). THE IMPACT OF VIX RISK APPETITE INDEX ON THE DYNAMICS OF TIME-VARYING MARKET EFFICIENCY IN BORSA ISTANBUL. Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting, 12(1), 20-29. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2025.1964

Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting (JEFA) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, semiannual and open-access online journal. The journal publishes 2 issues a year. The issuing months are June and December. The publication language of the Journal is English. JEFA aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in the area of economics, finance, accounting and auditing. The editor in chief of JEFA invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JEFA publishes academic research studies only. JEFA charges no submission or publication fee.

Ethics Policy - JEFA applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JEFA is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract).

Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.