Research Article

The Relationship between Physical Activity and Smart Phone Use in University Students

Volume: 6 Number: 4 October 1, 2020
EN

The Relationship between Physical Activity and Smart Phone Use in University Students

Abstract

Smartphone addiction and physical inactivity are often a major public health problem across the world. This research was aimed to determine the smartphone addiction status, physical activity levels and related factors of university students. Using convenience sampling, university students in Isparta/Turkey completed two questionnaires in Spring semester assessing smartphone addiction and physical activity levels. A total of 147 participants attended in this study. The participants included in the scope of the research; the questionnaire including the International Physical Activity Questionnaire and the Smartphone Addiction Questionnaire, which were considered to be related to socio-demographic characteristics, smartphone use and physical activity habits were applied under direct observation. The physical activity for males was higher than females. There was a significant relationship between age and smart phone use. Whereas the age of the participants increased, a decrease in the number of smartphone usage was observed. The differences of between educational groups are related to the lower level of smartphone addiction of the graduate students compared to the associate degree students. Finally, there was no significant difference between the level of physical activity and the score of smartphone usage as the main aim of this study.

Keywords

References

  1. Anderson S.E., & Robert C. W. (2010). Household Routines and Obesity in US Preschool-Aged Children. Pediatrics, 125(3), 420–428.
  2. Arsand, E, Miroslav M., Meghan B., Jan M., & Gunnar H. (2015). Performance of the First Combined Smartwatch and Smartphone Diabetes Diary Application Study. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 9(3), 556–563.
  3. Baranowski, T., Bouchard, C., Bar-Or, O., Bricker, T., Heath, G., Kimm, S. Y., Malina, R., Obarzanek, E., Pate, R., & Strong, W. B. (1992). Assessment, prevalence, and cardiovascular benefits of physical activity and fitness in youth. Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 24(6 Suppl), S237–S247.
  4. Bauer, K. W., Nelson, M. C., Boutelle, K. N., & Neumark-Sztainer, D. (2008). Parental influences on adolescents' physical activity and sedentary behavior: longitudinal findings from Project EAT-II. The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 5, 12.
  5. Bayrakçı, V.T. (2008). Yetişkinlerde Fiziksel Aktivite. 1. edn. Ankara: Klasmat Matbaacılık.
  6. Bianchi, A., & Phillips, J. G. (2005). Psychological predictors of problem mobile phone use. Cyberpsychology & behavio: the impact of the Internet, multimedia and virtual reality on behavior and society, 8(1), 39–51.
  7. Bozkuş, T., Türkmen, M., Kul, M., Özkan, A., Öz, Ü., & Cengi̇z, C. (2013). Beden eğitimi ve spor yüksekokulu’nda öğrenim gören öğrencilerin fiziksel aktivite düzeyleri ile sağlikli yaşam biçimi davranişlarinin belirlenmesi ve ilişkilendirilmesi. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science, 1(3), 49-65.
  8. Budd, E. L., McQueen, A., Eyler, A. A., Haire-Joshu, D., Auslander, W. F., & Brownson, R. C. (2018). The role of physical activity enjoyment in the pathways from the social and physical environments to physical activity of early adolescent girls. Preventive medicine, 111, 6–13.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Special Education and Disabled Education

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Mert Minaz
Türkiye

Publication Date

October 1, 2020

Submission Date

February 11, 2020

Acceptance Date

September 25, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 6 Number: 4

APA
Demirbilek, M., & Minaz, M. (2020). The Relationship between Physical Activity and Smart Phone Use in University Students. Journal of Education in Science Environment and Health, 6(4), 282-296. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.795980