The Effect of Virtual Laboratory Applications on 8th Grade Students' Achievement in Science Lesson

Abstract

The aim of this study is to reveal the effect of using virtual lab application in science teaching on students’ academic achievement and students' views on virtual lab application. The working group of the research consists of 62 students studying in the 8th grade of a secondary school in Antalya in the 2019-2020 academic year. Since the research has a qualitative and quantitative dimension, mixed research design was used. In the quantitative dimension of the study, the control group and the experimental group taught with virtual laboratory applications were compared in terms of achievement. The qualitative dimension of the study was composed of the data obtained from the interview forms conducted with the experimental group students after the application and the data obtained from the observation forms made during the application. Research results revealed that virtual laboratory applications increased the academic success of the experimental group students. On the other hand, it has been shown that virtual laboratory applications contribute to students’ meaningful learning by enabling the concretization of abstract subjects, and that these applications positively support students' interest, excitement and motivation towards the science course because they are found attractive.

Keywords

• virtual lab
• science edıcation
• virtual experiments

References

1. Arjamand, M. J., & Khattak, M. D. (2013). Virtual labs: A new horizon for localised distance education. Paper presented at the 27th Annual Conference of Asian Association of Open Universities 2013, Islamabad, Pakistan.
2. Arvind, V.R. and Heard, J.W. (2010). Physics by simulation: Teaching circular motion using applets. Latin American Journal of Physics Education, 4(1), 35-39. Aşıksoy,G. & Islek, D. 2017. The impact of the virtual laboratory on students’ attitudes in a general physics laboratory. International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering (iJOE), Vol:13 No:4 20-28
3. Atam, O. & Tekdal, M. (2010). The effect of a simulation-based software prepared on science and technology lesson heat-temperature on the academic success and permanence of 5th grade students. Educational Technology Research Journal. Educational Technology Research Journal, 1(2), 1-18.
4. Başçiftçi, R. (2013). The effect of computer assısted teachıng on student achıevement and permanent learnıng ın scıence and technology; example of the systems unıt ın our body. Journal of Educational Technology Research, 4(1)
5. Bell, J. (1999). The biology labs on-line project: Producing educational simulations that promote active learning. Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of ComputerEnhanced Learning, 1(2).
6. Bozkurt, E., & Sarıkoç, A. (2008). Can the vırtual laboratory replace thetradıtıonal laboratory ın physıcseducatıon? Selcuk University Ahmet Keleşoğlu Faculty of Education Journal, 25, 89–100.
7. Ceylan, N. ve Seçken, N. (2019). Computer animations-supported ınstructional material design based on 5e learning model: a case of “chemical speed and equilibrium” unit. Gazi University Journal of Education Faculty, 39(3), 1181-1202
8. Chang, C.Y. (2000). Enhancing tenth graders’earth-science learning through computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Geoscience Education, 48, 636- 641.

9. Chen, S. (2010). The view of scientific inquiry conveyed by simulation-based virtual laboratories. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1123–1130.
10. Creswell, J.W. ve Plano Clark, V.L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc
11. Cresswell, J.W ve Plano Clark, V.L. (2014). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
12. Çömek A. (2003), The Effects of computer assisted science instruction materials on students achievement in heat and the journey of heat in the matter unit. Marmara University / Institute of Educational Sciences. (Published Master Thesis), İstanbul.
13. Domingues L, Rocha I, Dourado F, Alves M & Ferreira E.C. (2010) Virtual laborato ries in (Bio)chemical engineering education. Education for Chemical Engineers, 5, e22–e27.
14. Dos Santos, F. R., Guetl, C., Bailey, P. H., & Harward, V. J. (2010). Dynamic virtual environment for multiple physics experiments in higher education. Education Engineering (EDUCON), 2010 IEEE, 731-736.
15. Duman, M.Ş ve Avcı, G. (2016). Effect of virtual laboratory practices of student success and learning permanence: Mersin-Erdemli Sample. Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 18-1 (2016), 13-33
16. Ekici, E., Ekici, F. ve Aydın, F. (2007). Preservıce scıence teachers’ vıews on usabılıty of analogıes ın scıence courses and theır examples. Ahi Evran University Kırşehir Education Faculty Journal, 8(1), 95-113.
17. Finkelstein, N. D., Adams, W. K., Keller, C. J., Kohl, P. B., Perkins, K. K., Podolefsky, N. S., & Reid, S. (2005). When learning about the real world is better done virtually: A study of substituting computer simulations for laboratory equipment. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 1(1),1-8.
18. Harwood, W. S. & McMahon, M. M., (1997). Effects of Integrated Video Media on Student Achievement and Attitudes in High School Chemistry, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(6), 617-631.
19. Karasar, N. (2012). Scientific research method (23rd edition). Ankara: Nobel Publication.
20. Karagöz-Mırçık, Ö. & Saka, A.Z. (2016). Evaluatıon of vırtual laboratory based applıcatıons ın physıcs teachıng. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching. June 2016 Volume: 5 Special Issue Article No: 43 ISSN: 2146-9199
21. Kaya, H. ve Aydın, F. (2011). Students’ vıews towards ınteractıve whıte board applıcatıons ın the teachıng of geography themes ın socıal knowledge lessons. Zeitschrift für die welt der türken journal of world of turks. ZFWT, 3,1.
22. Kıyıcı, G. ve Yumuşak, A. (2005). The affects of computer assisted activity at science laboratory lesson on student's acquiry; example of acid – base concept's and tıtratıon topıc. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4(4), 130-134.
23. Kolomuç, A. (2009). Animation aidet instruction on? rate of chemical reactions? unit in grade 11 in regart to 5E model. (Doctoral Thesis). Atatürk University / Science University, Erzurum
24. Olgun, A. (2006). The effect of the computer-assisted science instruction to students science attitudes, metacognitions and their success. Osmangazi University / Institute of Science. (Unpublished Master's Thesis). Eskişehir.
25. Özdemir, E. (2019). Use of virtual experiments as learning activity in modern physics course: A case of cathode ray tube experiment. Studies in Educational Research and Development, 3(2), 43-61.
26. Qing Yu, J. , Brown, D. & Billet, E. (2005). Development of a virtual laboratory experiment for biology. Europen Journal of Open, Distance and E- learning,2, 1-8.
27. Sarı,U., H. Miraç Pektaş,H.M., Çelik, H., Kirindi, T. (2019). The effects of virtual and computer based real laboratory applications on the attitude, motivation and graphic skills of university students. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 27(1), 1-17, 2019.
28. Stefanovic, M., Tadic, D., Nestic, S., & Djordjevic, A.(2013). An assessment of distance learning laboratory objectives for control engineering education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 23(2), 191–202.
29. Tankut, Ü.S. (2008). The effect of computer assisted instruction to academic success and continuity for the course of social studies in primary school 7th class. (Unpublished master's thesis). Çukurova University Institute of Social Sciences, Adana.
30. Tatlı, Z. ve Ayas, A. (2011, Ekim). Development process of vırtual chemıstry laboratory. International Computer & Instructional Technologies Symposium, Fırat University, Elazığ- Turkey.
31. Tekdal, M. (2002). Development and effective use of interactive physics simulations. V. National Science and Mathematics Education Congress, ODTÜ, Ankara,
32. Uğur, A. (2001). Computer graphics and graphic software in education. Ege Journal of Education, 2001(1), 1: 146-156.
33. Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2013). In social sciences qualitative research methods (9. printing). Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.