Differences were examined between groups of sixth grade students’
spatial-scientific development pre/post implementation of an Earth/Space unit. Treatment
teachers employed a spatially-integrated Earth/Space curriculum, while control
teachers implemented their Business as Usual (BAU) Earth/Space units. A
multi-level modeling approach was used in a hierarchical manner to evaluate
student performance on the Purdue Spatial Visualization: Rotation test
(PSVT-Rot) and on the Lunar Phases Concept Inventory (which included four
spatial domains), while controlling for two variables (gender and race/ethnicity)
at the student level and one variable (teaching experience) at the teacher
level. Results showed Treatment girls achieved higher LPCI Periodic Patterns
(PP) spatial domain post-scores than girls in the BAU group. A gender gap was also
observed (in favor of boys) within the BAU group for PP domain post-scores,
while no gap was shown within the Treatment group. In addition, results
for PP suggest Students of Color tended to have lower PP scores than White
students (Effect Size = .29), and that higher pretest PP scores tended to lead
to higher posttest PP scores, after adjusting for other student and teacher
characteristics. The only statistically significant predictor of the PSVT-Rot
posttest scores were scores on the respective pretest.
Middle school education Geometrical and spatial thinking Gender and race/ethnicity Astronomy education
Bölüm | Articles |
---|---|
Yazarlar | |
Yayımlanma Tarihi | 30 Ocak 2017 |
Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2017 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1 |