Research Article

Postoperative analgesic effectiveness of bilateral erector spinae plane block for adult cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial

Volume: 5 Number: 1 January 17, 2022
EN

Postoperative analgesic effectiveness of bilateral erector spinae plane block for adult cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Introduction: There are few randomized controlled trials examining the effectiveness of bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESP) with patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The effect of bilateral ESP block on postoperative pain levels and analgesic consumption for patients undergoing open-heart surgery was examined in this single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Material and Method: 54 patients who underwent cardiac surgery with open median sternotomy under general anesthesia between May 2020 and June 2021 were included in the study. Patients were randomized into two groups, each consisting of 27 patients, one with 40 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine and bilateral ESP block, the other with no block implementation (control group). Demographic data, operation type, length of stay in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), numerical rating scale (NRS) values in the first 24 hours after extubation, and morphine consumption values of the patients were recorded for the study. Results: In the study, 4 patients were excluded from follow-up due to prolonged intubation in the postoperative period. The data of a total of 50 patients (ESP group n=25; Control group n=25) were analyzed. The duration before first analgesic (mean±SD: 459.2±92.8 min.) of the ESP group was statistically longer than those in the control group (mean±SD: 142.0±56.6 min.) (p<0.001). The total length of stay in the ICU and rate of nausea-vomiting were lower for the ESP group than for the control group (p<0.05). Total morphine consumption (mean±SD: 5.1±3.1 mg) of the ESP group in the first 24 hours was statistically lower (p<0.001) compared to the consumption of the control group (mean±SD: 14.8±4.2 mg). NRS scores were significantly lower for the ESP group at postoperative 1st, 2nd, 4th, 6th, and 8th hours compared to the control group (p<0.05). Conclusion: ESP block applied bilaterally in adult cardiac surgeries decreased postoperative pain scores and morphine consumption. At the same time, it was observed that the length of stay of the patients in the ICU was reduced and there were no complications.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

yok

Thanks

We would like to thank the cardiovascular surgery doctors and nurses for their support and patience during the study.

References

  1. Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review. JAMA Surg 2017; 152: 292-8.
  2. Markham T, Wegner R, Hernandez N, et al. Assessment of a multimodal analgesia protocol to allow the implementation of enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery: retrospective analysis of patient outcomes. J Clin Anesth 2019; 54: 76-80.
  3. Guay J, Kopp S. Epidural analgesia for adults undergoing cardiac surgery with or without cardiopulmonary bypass. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 3: CD006715. 
  4. Sun L, Li Q, Wang Q, Ma F, Han W, Wang M. Bilateral thoracic paravertebral block combined with general anesthesia vs. general anesthesia for patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a feasibility study. BMC Anesthesiol 2019; 19: 101.
  5. Mehta Y, Arora D, Sharma KK, Mishra Y, Wasir H, Trehan N. Comparison of continuous thoracic epidural and paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia after robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Card Anaesth 2008; 11: 91-6. 
  6. Kot P, Rodriguez P, Granell M, et al. The erector spinae plane block: a narrative review. Korean J Anesthesiol 2019; 72: 209-20.
  7. Nagaraja PS, Ragavendran S, Singh NG, et al. Comparison of continuous thoracic epidural analgesia with bilateral erector spinae plane block for perioperative pain management in cardiac surgery. Ann Card Anaesth 2018; 21: 323-7.
  8. Bigeleisen PE, Goehner N. Novel approaches in pain management in cardiac surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2015; 28: 89-94.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

January 17, 2022

Submission Date

October 23, 2021

Acceptance Date

November 22, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 5 Number: 1

APA
Güven, B. B., Ertürk, T., & Ersoy, A. (2022). Postoperative analgesic effectiveness of bilateral erector spinae plane block for adult cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, 5(1), 150-155. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1013908
AMA
1.Güven BB, Ertürk T, Ersoy A. Postoperative analgesic effectiveness of bilateral erector spinae plane block for adult cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial. J Health Sci Med / JHSM. 2022;5(1):150-155. doi:10.32322/jhsm.1013908
Chicago
Güven, Bülent Barış, Tuna Ertürk, and Aysin Ersoy. 2022. “Postoperative Analgesic Effectiveness of Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block for Adult Cardiac Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial”. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine 5 (1): 150-55. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1013908.
EndNote
Güven BB, Ertürk T, Ersoy A (January 1, 2022) Postoperative analgesic effectiveness of bilateral erector spinae plane block for adult cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine 5 1 150–155.
IEEE
[1]B. B. Güven, T. Ertürk, and A. Ersoy, “Postoperative analgesic effectiveness of bilateral erector spinae plane block for adult cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial”, J Health Sci Med / JHSM, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 150–155, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.32322/jhsm.1013908.
ISNAD
Güven, Bülent Barış - Ertürk, Tuna - Ersoy, Aysin. “Postoperative Analgesic Effectiveness of Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block for Adult Cardiac Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial”. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine 5/1 (January 1, 2022): 150-155. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1013908.
JAMA
1.Güven BB, Ertürk T, Ersoy A. Postoperative analgesic effectiveness of bilateral erector spinae plane block for adult cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial. J Health Sci Med / JHSM. 2022;5:150–155.
MLA
Güven, Bülent Barış, et al. “Postoperative Analgesic Effectiveness of Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block for Adult Cardiac Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial”. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, vol. 5, no. 1, Jan. 2022, pp. 150-5, doi:10.32322/jhsm.1013908.
Vancouver
1.Bülent Barış Güven, Tuna Ertürk, Aysin Ersoy. Postoperative analgesic effectiveness of bilateral erector spinae plane block for adult cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial. J Health Sci Med / JHSM. 2022 Jan. 1;5(1):150-5. doi:10.32322/jhsm.1013908

Cited By

Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency: Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS].

The Directories (indexes) and Platforms we are included in are at the bottom of the page.

Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.

You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/2316/file/4905/show







The indexes of the journal are ULAKBİM TR Dizin, ICI World of Journals, DOAJ, Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact Factor, ASOS Index, WorldCat (OCLC), MIAR, OpenAIRE, Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index, Scilit, etc.

       images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRB9r6zRLDl0Pz7om2DQkiTQXqDtuq64Eb1Qg&usqp=CAU

500px-WorldCat_logo.svg.png

atifdizini.png

logo_world_of_journals_no_margin.png

images?q=tbn%3AANd9GcTNpvUjQ4Ffc6uQBqMQrqYMR53c7bRqD9rohCINkko0Y1a_hPSn&usqp=CAU

doaj.png  

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSpOQFsFv3RdX0lIQJC3SwkFIA-CceHin_ujli_JrqBy3A32A_Tx_oMoIZn96EcrpLwTQg&usqp=CAU

ici2.png

asos-index.png

drji.png





The platforms of the journal are Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, Open Access, COPE, ICMJE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons, etc.

COPE-logo-300x199.jpgimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcQR6_qdgvxMP9owgnYzJ1M6CS_XzR_d7orTjA&usqp=CAU

icmje_1_orig.png

cc.logo.large.png

ncbi.pngimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcRBcJw8ia8S9TI4Fun5vj3HPzEcEKIvF_jtnw&usqp=CAU

ORCID_logo.png

1*mvsP194Golg0Dmo2rjJ-oQ.jpeg


Our Journal using the DergiPark system indexed are;

Ulakbim TR Dizin,  Index Copernicus, ICI World of JournalsDirectory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact FactorASOS Index, OpenAIRE, MIAR,  EuroPub, WorldCat (OCLC)DOAJ,  Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index


Our Journal using the DergiPark system platforms are;

Google, Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, ICJME, COPE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons, Open Access, and etc.


Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review". 

Our journal has adopted the Open Access Policy and articles in JHSM are Open Access and fully comply with Open Access instructions. All articles in the system can be accessed and read without a journal user.  https//dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jhsm/page/9535

Journal charge policy   https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jhsm/page/10912

Our journal has been indexed in DOAJ as of May 18, 2020.

Our journal has been indexed in TR-Dizin as of March 12, 2021.


17873

Articles published in Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine have open access and are licensed under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License.