Comparison of prone position effectiveness with percentage of injured lung area in awake non - intubated COVID-19 patients

Abstract

Aim: Prone position plays a key role in the treatment of both non-intubated and intubated patients because COVID-19 associated respiratory failure is gas exchange abnormalities based on shunt and dead-space ventilation. In this study, we aimed to compare the effect of prone position applied in awake non-intubated COVID-19 patients with percentage of injured lung area. Material and Method: 65 patients with awake, non-intubated were included in this prospective, single-center study. Percentage of injured lung area was calculated using chest computer tomography taken during diagnosis of patients. The prone position cycle was applied as 6 hours prone, 4-6 hours supine position. Results: The mean of percentage of injured lung area was 25.16±13.81. When percentage of injured lung area groups were compared with the 0th, 6th, 24th and 48th hour SpO2/FIO2 ratio and respiratory frequency; while the SpO2/FIO2 ratio increased in all hours with prone position in the 0-10% and 10-30% groups, a decrease was observed in the SpO2/FIO2 ratio over time in the ≥ 30% group. Conclusions: The prone position is a safe and effective application that causes improvement in SpO2/FIO2 ratio and RR in awake non-intubated COVID-19 patients with less damage to the lung. However, it should be kept in mind that as the damage to the lung increases, the expected recovery might not be possible.

Keywords

• Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure
• COVID-19
• prone position
• critical care
• lung injury

References

1. Ding L, Wang L, Ma W, He H. Efficacy and safety of early prone positioning combined with HFNC or NIV in moderate to severe ARDS: a multi-center prospective cohort study. Crit Care 2020; 24: 28.
2. Taboada M, Bermúdez A, Pérez M, Campaña O. Supine versus Prone Positioning in COVID-19 Pneumonia: Comment. Anesthesiology 2020; 133: 1155-7.
3. Scaravilli V, Grasselli G, Castagna L, et al. Prone positioning improves oxygenation in spontaneously breathing non-intubated patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure: a retrospective study, Journal of Critical Care 2015; 30: 1390-4.
4. Diehl JL, Peron N, Chocron R, et al. Respiratory mechanics and gas exchanges in the early course of COVID-19 ARDS: a hypothesis-generating study. Ann Intensive Care 2020; 10: 95.
5. Hallifax RJ, Porter BM, Elder PJ, et al; Oxford Respiratory Group. Successful awake proning is associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19: single-centre high-dependency unit experience. BMJ Open Respir Res 2020; 7: e000678.
6. Karpov A, Mitra AR, Crowe S, Haljan G. Prone position after liberation from prolonged mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 respiratory failure. Crit Care Res Pract 2020; 2020: 1-7.
7. Winearls S, Swingwood EL, Hardaker CL, et al. Early conscious prone positioning in patients with COVID-19 receiving continuous positive airway pressure: a retrospective analysis. BMJ Open Respir Res 2020; 7: e000711.
8. Parke RL, Eastwood GM, McGuinness SP; George Institute for Global Health; Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group. Oxygen therapy in non-intubated adult intensive care patients: a point prevalence study. Crit Care Resusc 2013; 15: 287-93.

9. Qu J-m, Cao B, Chen R-c. COVID-19 the Essentials of prevention and treatment, First edition, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2021
10. Gattinoni L, Chiumello D, Rossi S. COVID-19 pneumonia: ARDS or not?. Crit Care 2020; 154: 1-3.
11. Marini JJ, Gattinoni L. Management of COVID-19 Respiratory Distress. JAMA 2020; 323: 2329-30.
12. Caputo ND, Strayer RJ, Levitan R. Early self-proning in awake, non-intubated patients in the emergency department: a single ED's experience during the COVID-19 pandemic. Acad Emerg Med 2020; 27: 375-8.
13. Coppo A, Bellani G, Winterton D, et al. Feasibility and physiological effects of prone positioning in non-intubated patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19 (PRON-COVID): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med 2020; 8: 765-74.
14. Singh P, Jain P, Deewan H. Awake prone positioning in COVID-19 patients. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020; 24: 914-8.
15. Hahm CR, Lee YK, Oh DH, et al. Factors associated with worsening oxygenation in patient with non-severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul) 2021; 84: 115-2.
16. Ferrando C, Mellado-Artigas R, Gea A, et al. Awake prone positioning does not reduce the risk of intubation in COVID-19 treated with high-flow nasal oxygen therapy: a multicenter, adjusted cohort study. Crit Care 2020; 24: 597.
17. Telias I, Katira BH, Brochard L. Is the prone position helpful during spontaneous breathing in patients with COVID-19? JAMA 2020; 323: 2265-7.