Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2022, , 1190 - 1194, 20.07.2022
https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1116129

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Ali A, Hamman J, Mass DP. The biomechanical effects of angulated boxer’s fractures. J Hand Surg 2006; 24: 835- 44.
  • Başar B, Polat A. Safety Evaluation of Early Active and Passive Motion Without Immobilization in Metacarpal Fractures. J Acad Res Med 2021;11: 283-7.
  • Kim, Jae Kwang, and Dong Jin Kim. Antegrade intramedullary pinning versus retrograde intramedullary pinning for displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 2015; 473: 1747-54.
  • Nakashian MN, Pointer L, Owens BD, Wolf JM.Incidence of metacarpal fractures in the US population. Hand 2012; 7: 426-30.
  • Hussain MH, Ghaffar A, Choudry Q, Iqbal Z, Khan MN. Management of fifth metacarpal neck fracture (boxer's fracture): a literature review. Cureus 2020; 12: 7-10
  • Schadel-Hopfner M, Wild M, Windolf J, Linhart W. Antegrade intramedullary splinting or percutaneous retrograde crossed pinning for displaced neck fractures of the fifth metacarpal? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2007; 127: 435–40
  • Wong TC, Ip FK, Yeung SH. Comparison between percutaneous transverse fixation and intramedullary K-wires in treating closed fractures of the metacarpal neck of the little finger. J Hand Surg Br 2006; 31: 61–5
  • Zeng L, Zeng L, Miao X, Chen Y, Liang W,Jiang Y. Single versus dual elastic nails for closed reduction and antegrade intramedullary nailing of displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures. Scientific Reports 2021; 11: 1-9.
  • Muller MG, Poolman RW, van Hoogstraten MJ ,Steller E P. Immediate mobilization gives good results in boxer’s fractures with volar angulation up to 70 degrees: a prospective randomized trial comparing immediate mobilization with cast immobilization. Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 2003; 123: 534-7.
  • Padegimas EM, Warrender WJ, Jones CM, Ilyas, AM. Metacarpal neck fractures: a review of surgical indications and techniques. Archives of trauma research 2016; 5: 3-6.
  • Baydar M, Aydın A, Şencan A, Orman O, Aykut S. Comparison of clinical and radiological results of fixation methods with retrograde intramedullary Kirschner wire and plate-screw in extra-articular metacarpal fractures. Joint diseases and related surgery 2021; 32: 397-1.
  • Southam M, Driessens S, Burton C, Pope R, Thurnwald P. A retrospective cohort study of QuickDASH scores for common acute trauma conditions presenting for hand therapy. Journal of Hand 2017; 30: 41-8.
  • Facca S, Ramdhian R, Pelissier A, Diaconu M, Liverneaux D. Fifth metacarpal neck fracture fixation: locking plate versus K-wire?.” Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research 2010 ; 96: 506-12.
  • Calder JDF, S. O’Leary, and SC Evans. Antegrade intramedullary fixation of displaced fifth metacarpal fractures. Injury 2000; 311: 47-0.
  • She Yuanshi and Youjia Xu. Treatment of fifth metacarpal neck fractures with antegrade single elastic intramedullary nailing. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2017; 18: 1-5.

Fifth metacarpal neck fracture fixation: antegrade intramedullary pinning with two K-wires or percutaneous retrograde crossed pinning

Yıl 2022, , 1190 - 1194, 20.07.2022
https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1116129

Öz

Objective: The present study aimed to compare clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures after treatment with antegrade intramedullary pinning with two K-wires or percutaneous retrograde crossed pinning.
Material Method: While seventeen patients were treated with antegrade intramedullary pinning (Group ), 14 were treated with percutaneous retrograde crossed pinning (Group 2). Clinical and radiological outcomes included Quick Dash, active range of motion (ROM), VAS, and dorsal angulation loss at weeks four and twelve and in the final follow-up.
Results: The findings revealed that the groups had mean ages of 29.41±8.15 years and 27.78±7.42 years, res-pectively. While ROM was better in Group 2 at weeks four and twelve, we could not find a significant difference between the groups by active ROM in the final follow-up. Moreover, Group 1 had a better Dash score in the fourth week and twelth week , but both groups had similar Dash scores in the final follow-up. Finally, the groups had no preoperative and postoperative differences radiologically.
Conclusion: The present findings uncovered that treatment of a displaced fifth metacarpal neck fracture by anteg-rade intramedullary pinning yielded a better in the first three months improvement in active ROM and Quick Dash than percutaneous retrograde crossed pinning.

Kaynakça

  • Ali A, Hamman J, Mass DP. The biomechanical effects of angulated boxer’s fractures. J Hand Surg 2006; 24: 835- 44.
  • Başar B, Polat A. Safety Evaluation of Early Active and Passive Motion Without Immobilization in Metacarpal Fractures. J Acad Res Med 2021;11: 283-7.
  • Kim, Jae Kwang, and Dong Jin Kim. Antegrade intramedullary pinning versus retrograde intramedullary pinning for displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 2015; 473: 1747-54.
  • Nakashian MN, Pointer L, Owens BD, Wolf JM.Incidence of metacarpal fractures in the US population. Hand 2012; 7: 426-30.
  • Hussain MH, Ghaffar A, Choudry Q, Iqbal Z, Khan MN. Management of fifth metacarpal neck fracture (boxer's fracture): a literature review. Cureus 2020; 12: 7-10
  • Schadel-Hopfner M, Wild M, Windolf J, Linhart W. Antegrade intramedullary splinting or percutaneous retrograde crossed pinning for displaced neck fractures of the fifth metacarpal? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2007; 127: 435–40
  • Wong TC, Ip FK, Yeung SH. Comparison between percutaneous transverse fixation and intramedullary K-wires in treating closed fractures of the metacarpal neck of the little finger. J Hand Surg Br 2006; 31: 61–5
  • Zeng L, Zeng L, Miao X, Chen Y, Liang W,Jiang Y. Single versus dual elastic nails for closed reduction and antegrade intramedullary nailing of displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures. Scientific Reports 2021; 11: 1-9.
  • Muller MG, Poolman RW, van Hoogstraten MJ ,Steller E P. Immediate mobilization gives good results in boxer’s fractures with volar angulation up to 70 degrees: a prospective randomized trial comparing immediate mobilization with cast immobilization. Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 2003; 123: 534-7.
  • Padegimas EM, Warrender WJ, Jones CM, Ilyas, AM. Metacarpal neck fractures: a review of surgical indications and techniques. Archives of trauma research 2016; 5: 3-6.
  • Baydar M, Aydın A, Şencan A, Orman O, Aykut S. Comparison of clinical and radiological results of fixation methods with retrograde intramedullary Kirschner wire and plate-screw in extra-articular metacarpal fractures. Joint diseases and related surgery 2021; 32: 397-1.
  • Southam M, Driessens S, Burton C, Pope R, Thurnwald P. A retrospective cohort study of QuickDASH scores for common acute trauma conditions presenting for hand therapy. Journal of Hand 2017; 30: 41-8.
  • Facca S, Ramdhian R, Pelissier A, Diaconu M, Liverneaux D. Fifth metacarpal neck fracture fixation: locking plate versus K-wire?.” Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research 2010 ; 96: 506-12.
  • Calder JDF, S. O’Leary, and SC Evans. Antegrade intramedullary fixation of displaced fifth metacarpal fractures. Injury 2000; 311: 47-0.
  • She Yuanshi and Youjia Xu. Treatment of fifth metacarpal neck fractures with antegrade single elastic intramedullary nailing. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2017; 18: 1-5.
Toplam 15 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm Orijinal Makale
Yazarlar

Fırat Fidan 0000-0003-3490-7340

Mehmet Ümit Çetin 0000-0001-9827-8892

Yayımlanma Tarihi 20 Temmuz 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022

Kaynak Göster

AMA Fidan F, Çetin MÜ. Fifth metacarpal neck fracture fixation: antegrade intramedullary pinning with two K-wires or percutaneous retrograde crossed pinning. J Health Sci Med /JHSM /jhsm. Temmuz 2022;5(4):1190-1194. doi:10.32322/jhsm.1116129

Üniversitelerarası Kurul (ÜAK) Eşdeğerliği:  Ulakbim TR Dizin'de olan dergilerde yayımlanan makale [10 PUAN] ve 1a, b, c hariç  uluslararası indekslerde (1d) olan dergilerde yayımlanan makale [5 PUAN]

Dahil olduğumuz İndeksler (Dizinler) ve Platformlar sayfanın en altındadır.

Not:
Dergimiz WOS indeksli değildir ve bu nedenle Q olarak sınıflandırılmamıştır.

Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK) kriterlerine göre yağmacı/şüpheli dergiler hakkındaki kararları ile yazar aydınlatma metni ve dergi ücretlendirme politikasını tarayıcınızdan indirebilirsiniz. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/2316/file/4905/show 


Dergi Dizin ve Platformları

Dizinler; ULAKBİM TR Dizin, Index Copernicus, ICI World of Journals, DOAJ, Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact Factor, ASOS Index, WorldCat (OCLC), MIAR, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index, Scilit, vs.

Platformlar; Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, Open Access, COPE, ICMJE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons vs.