Research Article

Comparison between closed reduction plaster casting and percutaneous Kirschner wire pinning in the management of distal radius fractures in patients aged 65 years and older

Volume: 5 Number: 6 October 25, 2022
EN

Comparison between closed reduction plaster casting and percutaneous Kirschner wire pinning in the management of distal radius fractures in patients aged 65 years and older

Abstract

Aim: Closed reduction plaster casting (CRPC) and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) remain an important treatment modalities for extra-articular distal radius fractures especially in elderly patients. These two treatment methods have advantages and disadvantages compared to each other. The ideal treatment of extra-articular distal radius fractures is still debatable. We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the clinical and radiological results after CRPC and CRPP for the treatment of distal radius fractures in the patient population over 65 years of age. Material and Method: Between 1 January 2015 and 1 January 2019, patients older than 65 years of age who presented with extra-articular noncomminuted distal radius fractures were retrospectively evaluated. 95 patients diagnosed with distal radius fracture were separated into 2 groups, who were administered the following: CRPC (n:51), CRPP (n:44). We compared the characteristics of the patients, the mechanisms of injury, fracture types and treatment methods, pre-reduction and post-reduction radiological parameters and clinical functions for the two groups. Volar tilt, radial inclination, ulnar variance, and radial length were compared. Clinical results were also compared. Results: The mean follow-up period was 19.8 months (range, 12-29 months; SD=11.0) in the CRPC group and 18.6 months (range, 12-26 months; SD=10.9) in the CRPP group. Mean range of motion and grip strength were maintained in both treatment groups at one-year follow-up. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups (p>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of the scores evaluating the daily activity, pain and mental status of the patients after the treatment (p>0.05). There are no statistically significant differences between fixation with CRPC and CRPP in terms of clinical and radiological results (p>0.05). Conclusion: Closed reduction plaster casting and closed reduction percutaneous pinning are equally effective in the treatment of extra-articular distal radius fractures in the elderly.

Keywords

References

  1. Jupiter JB. Fractures of the distal end of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991; 73: 461-9.
  2. Nellans KW, Kowalski E, Chung KC. The epidemiology of distal radius fractures. Hand Clin 2012; 28: 113-25.
  3. Mensforth RP, Latimer BM. Hamann-Todd Collection aging studies: osteoporosis fracture syndrome. Am J Phys Anthropol 1989; 80: 461-79.
  4. Randomised TC, Group OSoSfFitDRitES. Surgical Plating vs Closed Reduction for Fractures in the Distal Radius in Older Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surgery 2021; 156: 229-37.
  5. Chhabra AB, Yildirim B. Adult Distal Radius Fracture Management. JAAOS - Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2021; 29: e1105-e16.
  6. Colles A. On the fracture of the carpal extremity of the radius. Edinb Med Surg J. 1814;10:181. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 445: 5-7.
  7. Arora R, Lutz M, Deml C, Krappinger D, Haug L, Gabl M. A prospective randomized trial comparing nonoperative treatment with volar locking plate fixation for displaced and unstable distal radial fractures in patients sixty-five years of age and older. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93: 2146-53.
  8. Horne JG, Devane P, Purdie G. A prospective randomized trial of external fixation and plaster cast immobilization in the treatment of distal radial fractures. J Orthop Trauma 1990; 4: 30-4.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

October 25, 2022

Submission Date

September 17, 2022

Acceptance Date

October 3, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 5 Number: 6

APA
Karadeniz, S., Yurtbay, A., Öztürk, Ö., Ersoy, A., Çalışal, E., & Pişkin, A. (2022). Comparison between closed reduction plaster casting and percutaneous Kirschner wire pinning in the management of distal radius fractures in patients aged 65 years and older. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, 5(6), 1631-1638. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1176581
AMA
1.Karadeniz S, Yurtbay A, Öztürk Ö, Ersoy A, Çalışal E, Pişkin A. Comparison between closed reduction plaster casting and percutaneous Kirschner wire pinning in the management of distal radius fractures in patients aged 65 years and older. J Health Sci Med / JHSM. 2022;5(6):1631-1638. doi:10.32322/jhsm.1176581
Chicago
Karadeniz, Selami, Alparslan Yurtbay, Özkan Öztürk, Ahmet Ersoy, Emre Çalışal, and Ahmet Pişkin. 2022. “Comparison Between Closed Reduction Plaster Casting and Percutaneous Kirschner Wire Pinning in the Management of Distal Radius Fractures in Patients Aged 65 Years and Older”. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine 5 (6): 1631-38. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1176581.
EndNote
Karadeniz S, Yurtbay A, Öztürk Ö, Ersoy A, Çalışal E, Pişkin A (October 1, 2022) Comparison between closed reduction plaster casting and percutaneous Kirschner wire pinning in the management of distal radius fractures in patients aged 65 years and older. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine 5 6 1631–1638.
IEEE
[1]S. Karadeniz, A. Yurtbay, Ö. Öztürk, A. Ersoy, E. Çalışal, and A. Pişkin, “Comparison between closed reduction plaster casting and percutaneous Kirschner wire pinning in the management of distal radius fractures in patients aged 65 years and older”, J Health Sci Med / JHSM, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 1631–1638, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.32322/jhsm.1176581.
ISNAD
Karadeniz, Selami - Yurtbay, Alparslan - Öztürk, Özkan - Ersoy, Ahmet - Çalışal, Emre - Pişkin, Ahmet. “Comparison Between Closed Reduction Plaster Casting and Percutaneous Kirschner Wire Pinning in the Management of Distal Radius Fractures in Patients Aged 65 Years and Older”. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine 5/6 (October 1, 2022): 1631-1638. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1176581.
JAMA
1.Karadeniz S, Yurtbay A, Öztürk Ö, Ersoy A, Çalışal E, Pişkin A. Comparison between closed reduction plaster casting and percutaneous Kirschner wire pinning in the management of distal radius fractures in patients aged 65 years and older. J Health Sci Med / JHSM. 2022;5:1631–1638.
MLA
Karadeniz, Selami, et al. “Comparison Between Closed Reduction Plaster Casting and Percutaneous Kirschner Wire Pinning in the Management of Distal Radius Fractures in Patients Aged 65 Years and Older”. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, vol. 5, no. 6, Oct. 2022, pp. 1631-8, doi:10.32322/jhsm.1176581.
Vancouver
1.Selami Karadeniz, Alparslan Yurtbay, Özkan Öztürk, Ahmet Ersoy, Emre Çalışal, Ahmet Pişkin. Comparison between closed reduction plaster casting and percutaneous Kirschner wire pinning in the management of distal radius fractures in patients aged 65 years and older. J Health Sci Med / JHSM. 2022 Oct. 1;5(6):1631-8. doi:10.32322/jhsm.1176581

Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency: Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS].

The Directories (indexes) and Platforms we are included in are at the bottom of the page.

Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.

You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/2316/file/4905/show







The indexes of the journal are ULAKBİM TR Dizin, ICI World of Journals, DOAJ, Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact Factor, ASOS Index, WorldCat (OCLC), MIAR, OpenAIRE, Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index, Scilit, etc.

       images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRB9r6zRLDl0Pz7om2DQkiTQXqDtuq64Eb1Qg&usqp=CAU

500px-WorldCat_logo.svg.png

atifdizini.png

logo_world_of_journals_no_margin.png

images?q=tbn%3AANd9GcTNpvUjQ4Ffc6uQBqMQrqYMR53c7bRqD9rohCINkko0Y1a_hPSn&usqp=CAU

doaj.png  

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSpOQFsFv3RdX0lIQJC3SwkFIA-CceHin_ujli_JrqBy3A32A_Tx_oMoIZn96EcrpLwTQg&usqp=CAU

ici2.png

asos-index.png

drji.png





The platforms of the journal are Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, Open Access, COPE, ICMJE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons, etc.

COPE-logo-300x199.jpgimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcQR6_qdgvxMP9owgnYzJ1M6CS_XzR_d7orTjA&usqp=CAU

icmje_1_orig.png

cc.logo.large.png

ncbi.pngimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcRBcJw8ia8S9TI4Fun5vj3HPzEcEKIvF_jtnw&usqp=CAU

ORCID_logo.png

1*mvsP194Golg0Dmo2rjJ-oQ.jpeg


Our Journal using the DergiPark system indexed are;

Ulakbim TR Dizin,  Index Copernicus, ICI World of JournalsDirectory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact FactorASOS Index, OpenAIRE, MIAR,  EuroPub, WorldCat (OCLC)DOAJ,  Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index


Our Journal using the DergiPark system platforms are;

Google, Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, ICJME, COPE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons, Open Access, and etc.


Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review". 

Our journal has adopted the Open Access Policy and articles in JHSM are Open Access and fully comply with Open Access instructions. All articles in the system can be accessed and read without a journal user.  https//dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jhsm/page/9535

Journal charge policy   https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jhsm/page/10912

Our journal has been indexed in DOAJ as of May 18, 2020.

Our journal has been indexed in TR-Dizin as of March 12, 2021.


17873

Articles published in Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine have open access and are licensed under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License.