Research Article

Comparison of anterior midline incision and double incision in the surgical treatment of tibial plateau fractures

Volume: 6 Number: 2 March 27, 2023
EN

Comparison of anterior midline incision and double incision in the surgical treatment of tibial plateau fractures

Abstract

Aim: Tibial plateau fractures are complex fractures that often develop after high-energy trauma, often involving intra-articular fractures. They are rarely treated conservatively. Surgical planning and approach are very important in preventing possible complications. In this study, we compared two different incisions in the same fracture types. Material and Method: A total of 26 patients (20 males-6 females) with tibial plateau fractures were included in the study. Twelve of the patients were selected from those using anterior midline incisions, and 14 from those using double incisions as anterolateral and posteromedial incisions. The mean age of the patients is 50.8 (24-76) years. The distribution of patients according to fracture classification was 9 Schatzker type-6, 17 Schatzker type-5. Average follow-up time is 34.1 months (24.5-42.2). Postoperative complications, union time, joint range of motion, radiological Rasmussen criteria, Medial Proximal Tibial Angle (MPTA) and Posterior Proximal Tibial Angle (PPTA) measurements, Lachman and valgus-varus stress tests for ligament stability evaluation, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) assessments were performed to evaluate the clinical status of the patients. Results were compared between both incision groups. Results: Union in the anterior midline was 11.07 (±1.68) weeks and bilateral union was 9.96 (±1.35) weeks (p :0.074). Rasmussen scoring was 14.83 (±2.16) in the anterior group and 14.57 (±2.13) in the bilateral group (p:0.760). The MPTA was 85.35 (±3.97) degrees in the anterior group, and the MPTA was 86.40 (±3.74) degrees in the bilateral group (p: 0.492). PPTA was 80.77 (±1.95) degree in the anterior group, and PPTA was 80.85 (±1.78) degree in the bilateral group. HSS score was 70 (±9.02) in the anterior group and HSS score was 71.71 (±1.15) in the bilateral group (p:0.681). Rom was measured as 101.67 (±12.67) degrees in the anterior group and 107.86 (±13.54) degrees in the bilateral group (p: 0.243). The VAS anterior group was 2.83 (±1.64) and the VAS bilateral group was 3.36 (±2.09) (p:0.491).Instability was seen in 1 patient in the anterior group and 1 patient in the bilateral group (p:1). Infection was observed in 1 patient in the anterior group and in 3 patients in the bilateral group (p:0.598). Conclusion: The anterior incision is as effective a surgical approach as bilateral incision in correct patient preferences. Surgical site visibility in anterior incision is satisfactory. The principal aspect is to perform the correct surgical planning for the correct patient.

Keywords

References

  1. Berkson EM, Virkus WW. High-energy tibial plateau fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2006; 14: 20-31.
  2. Tsuchie H, Okada K, Nagasawa H, Chida S, Shimada Y. Bilateral stress fracture of the fibulae and periostitis of the tibiae. Med Princ Pract Int J Kuwait Univ Health Sci Cent 2010; 19: 490-2.
  3. Schatzker J, McBroom R, Bruce D. The tibial plateau fracture. The Toronto experience 1968--1975. Clin Orthop 1979; 138: 94-104.
  4. Barei DP, Nork SE, Mills WJ, Henley MB, Benirschke SK. Complications associated with internal fixation of high-energy bicondylar tibial plateau fractures utilizing a two-incision technique. J Orthop Trauma 2004; 18: 649-57.
  5. Perry CR, Evans LG, Rice S, Fogarty J, Burdge RE. A new surgical approach to fractures of the lateral tibial plateau. J Bone Joint Surg Am1984; 66: 1236-40.
  6. Padanilam TG, Ebraheim NA, Frogameni A. Meniscal detachment to approach lateral tibial plateau fractures. Clin Orthop 1995; 314: 192-8.
  7. Wang Z, Wang Y, Tian S, et al. Dual plating or dual plating combined with compression bolts for bicondylar tibial plateau fractures: a retrospective comparative study. Sci Rep 2021; 11: 7768.
  8. Abdel MP, von Roth P, Cross WW, Berry DJ, Trousdale RT, Lewallen DG. Total knee arthroplasty in patients with a prior tibial plateau fracture: a long-term report at 15 years. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30: 2170-2.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

March 27, 2023

Submission Date

December 14, 2022

Acceptance Date

February 1, 2023

Published in Issue

Year 2023 Volume: 6 Number: 2

APA
Bozduman, Ö. (2023). Comparison of anterior midline incision and double incision in the surgical treatment of tibial plateau fractures. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, 6(2), 347-352. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1218765
AMA
1.Bozduman Ö. Comparison of anterior midline incision and double incision in the surgical treatment of tibial plateau fractures. J Health Sci Med / JHSM. 2023;6(2):347-352. doi:10.32322/jhsm.1218765
Chicago
Bozduman, Ömer. 2023. “Comparison of Anterior Midline Incision and Double Incision in the Surgical Treatment of Tibial Plateau Fractures”. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine 6 (2): 347-52. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1218765.
EndNote
Bozduman Ö (March 1, 2023) Comparison of anterior midline incision and double incision in the surgical treatment of tibial plateau fractures. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine 6 2 347–352.
IEEE
[1]Ö. Bozduman, “Comparison of anterior midline incision and double incision in the surgical treatment of tibial plateau fractures”, J Health Sci Med / JHSM, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 347–352, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.32322/jhsm.1218765.
ISNAD
Bozduman, Ömer. “Comparison of Anterior Midline Incision and Double Incision in the Surgical Treatment of Tibial Plateau Fractures”. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine 6/2 (March 1, 2023): 347-352. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1218765.
JAMA
1.Bozduman Ö. Comparison of anterior midline incision and double incision in the surgical treatment of tibial plateau fractures. J Health Sci Med / JHSM. 2023;6:347–352.
MLA
Bozduman, Ömer. “Comparison of Anterior Midline Incision and Double Incision in the Surgical Treatment of Tibial Plateau Fractures”. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, vol. 6, no. 2, Mar. 2023, pp. 347-52, doi:10.32322/jhsm.1218765.
Vancouver
1.Ömer Bozduman. Comparison of anterior midline incision and double incision in the surgical treatment of tibial plateau fractures. J Health Sci Med / JHSM. 2023 Mar. 1;6(2):347-52. doi:10.32322/jhsm.1218765

Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency: Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS].

The Directories (indexes) and Platforms we are included in are at the bottom of the page.

Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.

You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/2316/file/4905/show







The indexes of the journal are ULAKBİM TR Dizin, ICI World of Journals, DOAJ, Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact Factor, ASOS Index, WorldCat (OCLC), MIAR, OpenAIRE, Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index, Scilit, etc.

       images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRB9r6zRLDl0Pz7om2DQkiTQXqDtuq64Eb1Qg&usqp=CAU

500px-WorldCat_logo.svg.png

atifdizini.png

logo_world_of_journals_no_margin.png

images?q=tbn%3AANd9GcTNpvUjQ4Ffc6uQBqMQrqYMR53c7bRqD9rohCINkko0Y1a_hPSn&usqp=CAU

doaj.png  

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSpOQFsFv3RdX0lIQJC3SwkFIA-CceHin_ujli_JrqBy3A32A_Tx_oMoIZn96EcrpLwTQg&usqp=CAU

ici2.png

asos-index.png

drji.png





The platforms of the journal are Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, Open Access, COPE, ICMJE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons, etc.

COPE-logo-300x199.jpgimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcQR6_qdgvxMP9owgnYzJ1M6CS_XzR_d7orTjA&usqp=CAU

icmje_1_orig.png

cc.logo.large.png

ncbi.pngimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcRBcJw8ia8S9TI4Fun5vj3HPzEcEKIvF_jtnw&usqp=CAU

ORCID_logo.png

1*mvsP194Golg0Dmo2rjJ-oQ.jpeg


Our Journal using the DergiPark system indexed are;

Ulakbim TR Dizin,  Index Copernicus, ICI World of JournalsDirectory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact FactorASOS Index, OpenAIRE, MIAR,  EuroPub, WorldCat (OCLC)DOAJ,  Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index


Our Journal using the DergiPark system platforms are;

Google, Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, ICJME, COPE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons, Open Access, and etc.


Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review". 

Our journal has adopted the Open Access Policy and articles in JHSM are Open Access and fully comply with Open Access instructions. All articles in the system can be accessed and read without a journal user.  https//dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jhsm/page/9535

Journal charge policy   https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jhsm/page/10912

Our journal has been indexed in DOAJ as of May 18, 2020.

Our journal has been indexed in TR-Dizin as of March 12, 2021.


17873

Articles published in Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine have open access and are licensed under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License.