Aims: This study evaluates whether trauma mechanisms, fracture types, and surgical treatment choices in cases of operatively treated talus fractures have an effect on the clinical outcomes of patients.
Methods: Twenty-six patients over the age of 18 who were surgically treated between 2019 and 2022 were included in the study. The collected data included age at the time of injury, gender, trauma characteristics (affected side, trauma mechanism, associated injuries), treatment characteristics (surgical delay, operation time, length of hospital stay), rates and types of revision surgery, and last follow-up date. The American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score and a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used to measure patient-reported outcomes.
Results: The mean age of the cohort was 33.6±11.8 years and it included 8 women (30.7%) and 18 men (69.2%). The most common trauma mechanisms were falls from a height (10 patients) and injuries sustained during traffic accidents (6 patients). The most common surgery performed was cannulated screw osteosynthesis (20 patients, 76.9%), followed by plate osteosynthesis (5 patients, 19.2%) and K-wire and screw osteosynthesis (1 patient, 3.9%). The mean VAS score was 1.9±2.1 (range: 0-8) and the mean AOFAS score was 67.2±25.5 (range: 17-97).
Conclusion: This study revealed that the selected surgical method, fracture type, and trauma mechanism did not have significant effects on patient-reported functional outcomes. These results suggest that, although talus fractures are rare, the need for surgical intervention and the occurrence of postoperative complications make these fractures a significant type of trauma.
Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
---|---|
Konular | Ortopedi |
Bölüm | Orijinal Makale |
Yazarlar | |
Yayımlanma Tarihi | 27 Ekim 2024 |
Gönderilme Tarihi | 18 Eylül 2024 |
Kabul Tarihi | 14 Ekim 2024 |
Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2024 |
Üniversitelerarası Kurul (ÜAK) Eşdeğerliği: Ulakbim TR Dizin'de olan dergilerde yayımlanan makale [10 PUAN] ve 1a, b, c hariç uluslararası indekslerde (1d) olan dergilerde yayımlanan makale [5 PUAN]
Dahil olduğumuz İndeksler (Dizinler) ve Platformlar sayfanın en altındadır.
Not: Dergimiz WOS indeksli değildir ve bu nedenle Q olarak sınıflandırılmamıştır.
Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK) kriterlerine göre yağmacı/şüpheli dergiler hakkındaki kararları ile yazar aydınlatma metni ve dergi ücretlendirme politikasını tarayıcınızdan indirebilirsiniz. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/2316/file/4905/show
Dergi Dizin ve Platformları
Dizinler; ULAKBİM TR Dizin, Index Copernicus, ICI World of Journals, DOAJ, Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact Factor, ASOS Index, WorldCat (OCLC), MIAR, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index, Scilit, vs.
Platformlar; Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, Open Access, COPE, ICMJE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons vs.