Canlı donörden karaciğer nakli alıcılarında ve nakil olmayan hastalarda ERCP'nin karşılaştırmalı sonuçları: tek merkez deneyimi

Year 2026, Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 301 - 305, 12.03.2026

Berk Baş , Ömer Küçükdemirci , Halil Şahin

https://izlik.org/JA49CS59XW

Abstract

Endoskopik retrograd kolanjiyopankreatografi (ERCP), canlı donör karaciğer nakli (LDLT) sonrası safra komplikasyonlarının yönetiminde birincil yöntemdir. Yaygın kullanımına rağmen, kanülasyon stratejileri, teknik zorluklar ve nakil sonrası popülasyondaki komplikasyon örüntüleri hakkında ayrıntılı veriler sınırlı kalmaktadır.

Keywords

ercp , karaciğer nakli , donör

Comparative outcomes of ERCP in living donor liver transplant recipients and non-transplant patients: single-center experience

https://izlik.org/JA49CS59XW

Abstract

Aims: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the primary modality for managing biliary complications after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Despite its widespread use, detailed data on cannulation strategies, technical challenges, and complication patterns in the post-transplant population remain limited.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 467 patients who underwent ERCP between 2022 and 2025 at a high volume tertiary liver transplant center. The LDLT cohort (n=70) was compared with a control group of non-transplant patients undergoing ERCP for benign biliary indications (n=397). Demographic characteristics, ERCP indications, technical parameters, cannulation methods, and 30-day complication rates were analyzed.
Results: LDLT patients were significantly younger than controls (52.5 vs. 64.9 years, p<0.001). Biliary strictures were the predominant indication in the LDLT cohort (84.3%), whereas choledocholithiasis dominated in controls (69.5%). Although overall technical success was high and comparable (91.4% vs. 94.7%), LDLT patients required significantly more adjunctive cannulation techniques and demonstrated longer cannulation times (11.6±5.0 vs. 7.1±2.3 minutes, p<0.001). Pancreatic duct cannulation was more frequent in the LDLT group (25.7% vs. 10.6%, p<0.001), yet post-ERCP pancreatitis remained low (1.4%). Cholangitis (37.1% vs. 4.0%, p<0.001) and ICU admission (18.6% vs. 4.0%, p<0.001) were significantly more common among LDLT recipients, although no cholangitis-related mortality occurred.
Conclusion: ERCP after LDLT is highly effective but technically more complex, requiring greater procedural expertise and exhibiting higher infectious complication rates. These findings highlight the need for experienced endoscopists and support further multicenter prospective studies to refine optimal cannulation strategies in transplant recipients.

Keywords

ERCP , liver transplantation , donor

References

• Boeva I, Karagyozov PI, Tishkov I. Post-liver transplant biliary complications: current knowledge and therapeutic advances. World J Hepatol. 2021;13(1):66. doi:10.4254/wjh.v13.i1.66
• Qian YB, Liu CL, Lo CM, Fan ST. Risk factors for biliary complications after liver transplantation. Arch Surg. 2004;139(10):1101-1105. doi:10. 1001/archsurg.139.10.1101
• Girotra M, Soota K, Klair JS, Dang SM, Aduli F. Endoscopic management of post-liver transplant biliary complications. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;7(5):446-459. doi:10.4253/wjge.v7.i5.446
• Wojcicki M, Milkiewicz P, Silva M. Biliary tract complications after liver transplantation: a review. Dig Surg. 2008;25(4):245-257. doi:10. 1159/000144653
• Magro B, Tacelli M, Mazzola A, Conti F, Celsa C. Biliary complications after liver transplantation: current perspectives and future strategies. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2021;10(1):76-92. doi:10.21037/hbsn.2019.09.01
• Sanna C, Giordanino C, Giono I, et al. Safety and efficacy of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with post-liver transplant biliary complications: results of a cohort study with long-term follow-up. Gut Liver. 2011;5(3):328-334. doi:10.5009/gnl.2011.5.3.328
• Balderramo D, Bordas JM, Sendino O, et al. Complications after ERCP in liver transplant recipients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74(2):285-294. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2011.04.025
• Brindise E, Sanchez A, Sahar N. S0907 ERCP in the liver transplant population: is it safe? ACG. 2020;115:S467. doi:10.14309/01.ajg.0000705676. 71805.17
• Day LW, Lin L, Somsouk M. Adverse events in older patients undergoing ERCP: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open. 2014; 2(1):E28-E36. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1365281
• Genzini T, Rodrigues MG, ALMEIDA TNd, et al. Liver transplantation in patients over 70 years old. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2025;38:e1894. doi:10. 1590/0102-67202025000025e1894
• Keswani RN, Ahmed A, Keeffe EB. Older age and liver transplantation: a review. Liver Transpl. 2004;10(8):957-967. doi:10.1002/lt.20155
• Chouker A, Martignoni A, Dugas M, et al. Estimation of liver size for liver transplantation: the impact of age and gender. Liver Transpl. 2004; 10(5):678-685. doi:10.1002/lt.20113
• Jagannath S, Kalloo AN. Biliary complications after liver transplantation. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2002;5(2):101-112. doi:10.1007/s11938- 002-0057-3
• Kochhar G, Parungao JM, Hanouneh IA, Parsi MA. Biliary complications following liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(19):2841-2846. doi:10.3748/wjg.v19.i19.2841
• Moy BT, Birk JW. A review on the management of biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2019;7(1):61-71. doi:10.14218/JCTH.2018.00028
• Hernandez MDP, Martin P, Simkins J. Infectious complications after liver transplantation. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2015;11(11):741.
• Isayama H, Hamada T, Fujisawa T, et al. TOKYO criteria 2024 for the assessment of clinical outcomes of endoscopic biliary drainage. Dig Endosc. 2024;36(11):1195-1210. doi:10.1111/den.14825
• Ghambari K, de Jong DM, Bruno MJ, Polak WG, van Driel LM, den Hoed CM. Risks of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis after liver transplantation. Clin Transplant. 2024;38(7): e15399. doi:10.1111/ctr.15399
• Kobayashi N, Kubota K, Shimamura T, et al. Complications of the treatment of endoscopic biliary strictures developing after liver transplantation. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2011;18(2):202-210. doi:10. 1007/s00534-010-0330-0
• Arata S, Takada T, Hirata K, et al. Post-ERCP pancreatitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2010;17(1):70-78. doi:10.1007/s00534-009-0220-5
• Pfau PR, Kochman ML, Lewis JD, et al. Endoscopic management of postoperative biliary complications in orthotopic liver transplantation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;52(1):55-63. doi:10.1067/mge.2000.106687
• Arain MA, Attam R, Freeman ML. Advances in endoscopic management of biliary tract complications after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2013;19(5):482-498. doi:10.1002/lt.23624