Evaluation of clinical indications for cone-beam computed tomography in children and adolescents: a cross-sectional investigation

Year 2026, Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 385 - 392, 12.03.2026

Cengiz Evli , Emine Ayyüce Kocabay , Semra Suzan Acar , Akif Demirel

https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1857301

https://izlik.org/JA27ED92LU

Abstract

Aims: This cross-sectional investigation aimed to systematically evaluate clinical indications for cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) examinations in pediatric and adolescent patients. The specific objectives included determining the frequency distribution of various clinical indications, examining relationships between patient age, gender, and referral indication, and analyzing patterns of CBCT utilization in this population.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 960 children and adolescents aged 18 years or younger who underwent CBCT examination at a university-based dental clinic. Data were systematically extracted from electronic patient records and CBCT referral forms, including patient age, biological sex, and clinical indications. Clinical indications were categorized into twelve distinct groups: impacted third molars, impacted canines, other impacted teeth, periapical lesions, supernumerary teeth, mesiodens, cleft lip and palate, temporomandibular joint disorders, dento-alveolar trauma, endodontic reasons, orthognathic surgery planning, and implant planning. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, Pearson Chi-square tests to evaluate the relationship between sex and CBCT indication, and Mann-Whitney U tests to compare age distributions across different clinical indications.
Results: Impacted teeth constituted the predominant indication for CBCT imaging, with impacted third molars representing the most frequent indication, followed by impacted canines. Significant gender-specific patterns were observed in the distribution of clinical indications, reflecting established epidemiological distributions of dental conditions. The age distribution varied significantly across different clinical indications, with concentration of referrals during adolescence corresponding to the developmental timeline of specific dental conditions.
Conclusion: This study shows that impacted teeth constitute the primary indication for pediatric CBCT examinations, aligning with evidence-based guidelines and appropriate clinical practice. The findings underscore the importance of ongoing attention to radiation safety principles in pediatric CBCT utilization, highlighting the need for careful justification criteria and systematic optimization of technical parameters to minimize radiation exposure while maintaining diagnostic adequacy in developing patients.

Keywords

Cone-beam computed tomography , pediatric dentistry , tooth , impacted , radiation protection , diagnostic imaging

Ethical Statement

Ankara University Faculty of Dentistry Ethics Committee (Decision number: 10/26, Date: 26/05/2025)

References

• Van Acker JWG, Martens LC, Aps JKM. Cone-beam computed tomography in pediatric dentistry, a retrospective observational study. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20(5):1003-1010. doi:10.1007/s00784-015-1592-3
• Oenning AC, Jacobs R, Pauwels R, et al. Cone-beam CT in paediatric dentistry: DIMITRA project position statement. Pediatr Radiol. 2018; 48(3):308-316. doi:10.1007/s00247-017-4012-9
• Theodorakou C, Walker A, Horner K, et al. Estimation of paediatric organ and effective doses from dental cone beam CT using anthropomorphic phantoms. Br J Radiol. 2012;85(1010):153-160. doi:10.1259/bjr/19389412
• Benavides E, Krecioch JR, Connolly RT, et al. Optimizing radiation safety in dentistry: Clinical recommendations and regulatory considerations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2024;155(4):280-293.e4. doi:10.1016/j.adaj.2023.12.002
• Jacobs R, Salmon B, Codari M, Hassan B, Bornstein MM. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use. BMC Oral Health. 2018;18(1):88. doi:10.1186/s12903-018-0523-5
• Horner K, Barry S, Dave M, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of cone beam computed tomography in paediatric dentistry: a systematic review. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2020;21(4):407-426. doi:10.1007/s40368-019-00504-x
• Ng YL, Shahab NB. Application of cone beam computed tomography in risk assessment of lower third molar surgery. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(5):919. doi:10.3390/diagnostics13050919
• Kapila S, Nervina JM. CBCT in orthodontics: assessment of treatment outcomes and indications for its use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(1): 20140282. doi:10.1259/dmfr.201402825
• Sousa TO, Haiter-Neto F, Nascimento EHL, Peroni LV, Freitas DQ, Bóscolo FN. Cone beam CT as a surgical guide to impacted anterior teeth. Rev Odontol UNESP. 2016;45(2):115-119. doi:10.1590/1807-2577.1071
• Hajem S, Brogårdh-Roth S, Nilsson M, Hellén-Halme K. The effect of optimum, indication-specific imaging fields on the radiation exposure from CBCT examinations of impacted maxillary canines and mandibular third molars. Acta Odontol Scand. 2023;81(8):603-610. doi:10.1080/00016357.2023.2245766
• Ismayılov R, Özgür B. Indications and use of cone beam computed tomography in children and young individuals in a university-based dental hospital. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):1033. doi:10.1186/s12903-023-03784-4
• Nahir CB, Çitir M, Çolak S, Keldal G. Assessment of cone beam computed tomography use in pediatric and adolescent patients: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):1068. doi:10.1186/s12903-024-04813-6
• Gallichan N, Albadri S, Dixon C, Jorgenson K. Trends in CBCT current practice within three UK paediatric dental departments. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2020;21(4):537-542. doi:10.1007/s40368-020-00526-w
• Baccher S, Gowdar IM, Guruprasad Y, Solanki RN. CBCT: a comprehensive overview of its applications and clinical significance in dentistry. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024;16(Suppl 3):S1923-S1925. doi:10. 4103/jpbs.jpbs_19_24
• Yiğit T, Yüksel HT, Evirgen Ş, Kaçmaz I, Türkmenoğlu A. Evaluation of use of cone beam computed tomography in paediatric patients: a cross-sectional study. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2023;33(5):468-476. doi:10.1111/ipd. 13046
• Hajem S, Brogårdh-Roth S, Nilsson M, Hellén-Halme K. CBCT of Swedish children and adolescents at an oral and maxillofacial radiology department. A survey of requests and indications. Acta Odontol Scand. 2020;78(1):38-44. doi:10.1080/00016357.2019.1645879
• Rodriguez Y Baena R, Beltrami R, Tagliabo A, Rizzo S, Lupi SM. Differences between panoramic and cone beam-CT in the surgical evaluation of lower third molars. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(2):e259-e265. doi:10.4317/jced.53234
• Safi Y, Moshfeghi M, Ghazizadeh Ahsaie M, Zameni M, Sahafi SA. Relationship between impacted mandibular third molars and the mandibular canal on CBCT scans. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2024; 34(2):37-44. doi:10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2022042569
• Matzen LH, Wenzel A. Efficacy of CBCT for assessment of impacted mandibular third molars: a review-based on a hierarchical model of evidence. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(1):20140189. doi:10.1259/dmfr.20140189
• Alqerban A, Jacobs R, Souza PC, Willems G. In-vitro comparison of 2 cone-beam computed tomography systems and panoramic imaging for detecting simulated canine impaction-induced external root resorption in maxillary lateral incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 136(6):764.e1-11. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.03.036
• European Commission. Radiation Protection No. 172. Cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology: evidence-based guidelines. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2012.
• Hajem S, Brogårdh-Roth S, Nilsson M, Hellén-Halme K. Minimum size and positioning of imaging field for CBCT scans of impacted maxillary canines. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(11):4019-4026. doi:10.1007/s00784-019-02850-5
• AAE and AAOMR Joint Position Statement: use of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics 2015 update. J Endod. 2015;41(9):1393-1396. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2015.07.013
• Yavuz I, Buyukkurt MC, Abdelouahab H, Dagsuyu IM. Investigation of impacted supernumerary teeth: a cone beam computed tomograph (cbct) study. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent. 2017;51(3):18-24. doi:10.17096/jiufd. 20098
• Jang SH, Park SH, Park JH, Song HY, Yang IH. Long-term CBCT evaluation of mandibular third molar changes after distalization in adolescents. Appl Sci. 2022;12(9):4613.
• Gümrü B, Guldali M, Tarcin B, Idman E, Peker MS. Evaluation of cone beam computed tomography referral profile: retrospective study in a Turkish paediatric subpopulation. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2021;22(1):66-70. doi:10.23804/ejpd.2021.22.01.12
• Oenning AC, Jacobs R, Pauwels R, Stratis A, Hedesiu M, Salmon B. Cone-beam CT in paediatric dentistry: DIMITRA project position statement. Pediatr Radiol. 2018;48(3):308-316. doi:10.1007/s00247-017-4012-9
• Benavides E, Krecioch JR, Connolly RT, et al. Optimizing radiation safety in dentistry: Clinical recommendations and regulatory considerations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2024;155(4):280-293.e4. doi:10.1016/j.adaj.2023.12.002
• Baccher S, Gowdar IM, Guruprasad Y, Solanki RN. CBCT: a comprehensive overview of its applications and clinical significance in dentistry. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024;16(Suppl 3):S1923-S1925. doi:10. 4103/jpbs.jpbs_19_24