Research Article

Surgical team members’ perceptions of the operating room nurses: a metaphor study

Volume: 9 Number: 4 July 20, 2026

Surgical team members’ perceptions of the operating room nurses: a metaphor study

Abstract

Aims: Existing studies have not adequately explored the professional identity of operating room nurses and their perceived value within the surgical team, particularly through a metaphorical approach. This study examined surgical team members’ perceptions of the operating room nurse through metaphor analysis. Methods: This qualitative study examined surgical team members’ perceptions of operating room nurses in Turkiye with at least six months of experience through metaphors. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 69 participants selected through purposive sampling. Participants were asked to generate a metaphor to describe operating room nurses and explain their rationale. Results: Participants generated 32 valid metaphors, grouped into four conceptual categories; ‘team leader,’ ‘supporter and assistant,’ ‘family member,’ and ‘patient advocate.’ The most frequent metaphors were found in the ‘team leader’ and ‘supporter/helper’ categories. The findings reflect the essential and multifaceted functions of the operating room nurse and demonstrate that surgical teams have a multidimensional perception of operating room nurses, spanning ‘invisible support,’ ‘silent leadership,’ and ‘patient advocacy.’ Conclusion: Operating room nurses are perceived within the surgical team for their technical skills and for their critical roles in leadership, coordination, and patient advocacy. Surgeons’ and nurses’ perceptions differed, rooted in professional and hierarchical dynamics. Increasing visibility of nurses’ leadership and advocacy roles and supporting shared leadership within the team are crucial to ensuring safer, more effective surgical care. Further studies are needed to develop interventions that increase team awareness and empower nurses in this area.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Girişimsel Olmayan Klinik Araştırmalar Etik Kurulu

Ethical Statement

Ethical approval for the study was received from the Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Ethics Committee (ID no: GO 2024/117 Date: 06.03.2024).

Thanks

The authors thank the surgical team members who participated in the study

References

  1. Chen Y, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Luo J. Facilitators of and barriers to teamwork between operating room nurses and other practitioners: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. BMJ Open. 2026;16(4):e098386. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098386
  2. Pasquer A, Ducarroz S, Lifante JC, Skinner S, Poncet G, Duclos A. Operating room organization and surgical performance: a systematic review. Patient Saf Surg. 2024;18(1):5. doi:10.1186/s13037-023-00388-3
  3. European Operating Room Nurses Association. EORNA Common Core Curriculum for Perioperative Nursing. 20th ed. European Operating Room Nurses Association; 2019.
  4. Antoniadou I, Björling G, Härenstam KP, Meijer S, Mattsson J. Operating room nurses’ perceptions of teamwork and learning in the operating room: a qualitative study. J Patient Saf Risk Manag. Published online February 10, 2026. doi:10.1177/25160435261421337
  5. Aktaş E, Atmaca HE, Akbulut HE. Operating room and surgical team members scheduling: a comprehensive review. J Proj Manag. 2024;9(2): 149-162. doi:10.5267/j.jpm.2023.12.001
  6. Liu G, Qi H, Hou F, Qi K, Luan X. The impact of professional mission on turnover intention among operating room nurses: a chain mediation model analysis of professional identity and job burnout. BMC Psychol. 2025;13(1):286. doi:10.1186/s40359-025-02606-2
  7. Aouicha W, Tlili MA, Limam M, et al. Evaluation of the impact of intraoperative distractions on teamwork, stress, and workload. J Surg Res. 2021;259:465-472. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2020.09.006
  8. Kanburoglu C, Sezer B. Medical student learning in the operating room: a qualitative study from the perspectives of students and the OR team. BMC Med Educ. 2026;26(1):227. doi:10.1186/s12909-026-08596-y

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Surgical Diseases Nursing​​

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

July 20, 2026

Submission Date

May 19, 2026

Acceptance Date

June 25, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 9 Number: 4

APA
Uçak, A., & Cebeci, F. (2026). Surgical team members’ perceptions of the operating room nurses: a metaphor study. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, 9(4), 1074-1081. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1954776
AMA
1.Uçak A, Cebeci F. Surgical team members’ perceptions of the operating room nurses: a metaphor study. J Health Sci Med / JHSM. 2026;9(4):1074-1081. doi:10.32322/jhsm.1954776
Chicago
Uçak, Ayşe, and Fatma Cebeci. 2026. “Surgical Team Members’ Perceptions of the Operating Room Nurses: A Metaphor Study”. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine 9 (4): 1074-81. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1954776.
EndNote
Uçak A, Cebeci F (July 1, 2026) Surgical team members’ perceptions of the operating room nurses: a metaphor study. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine 9 4 1074–1081.
IEEE
[1]A. Uçak and F. Cebeci, “Surgical team members’ perceptions of the operating room nurses: a metaphor study”, J Health Sci Med / JHSM, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1074–1081, July 2026, doi: 10.32322/jhsm.1954776.
ISNAD
Uçak, Ayşe - Cebeci, Fatma. “Surgical Team Members’ Perceptions of the Operating Room Nurses: A Metaphor Study”. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine 9/4 (July 1, 2026): 1074-1081. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1954776.
JAMA
1.Uçak A, Cebeci F. Surgical team members’ perceptions of the operating room nurses: a metaphor study. J Health Sci Med / JHSM. 2026;9:1074–1081.
MLA
Uçak, Ayşe, and Fatma Cebeci. “Surgical Team Members’ Perceptions of the Operating Room Nurses: A Metaphor Study”. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, vol. 9, no. 4, July 2026, pp. 1074-81, doi:10.32322/jhsm.1954776.
Vancouver
1.Ayşe Uçak, Fatma Cebeci. Surgical team members’ perceptions of the operating room nurses: a metaphor study. J Health Sci Med / JHSM. 2026 Jul. 1;9(4):1074-81. doi:10.32322/jhsm.1954776

Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency: Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS].

The Directories (indexes) and Platforms we are included in are at the bottom of the page.

Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.

You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/2316/file/4905/show







The indexes of the journal are ULAKBİM TR Dizin, ICI World of Journals, DOAJ, Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact Factor, ASOS Index, WorldCat (OCLC), MIAR, OpenAIRE, Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index, Scilit, etc.

       images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRB9r6zRLDl0Pz7om2DQkiTQXqDtuq64Eb1Qg&usqp=CAU

500px-WorldCat_logo.svg.png

atifdizini.png

logo_world_of_journals_no_margin.png

images?q=tbn%3AANd9GcTNpvUjQ4Ffc6uQBqMQrqYMR53c7bRqD9rohCINkko0Y1a_hPSn&usqp=CAU

doaj.png  

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSpOQFsFv3RdX0lIQJC3SwkFIA-CceHin_ujli_JrqBy3A32A_Tx_oMoIZn96EcrpLwTQg&usqp=CAU

ici2.png

asos-index.png

drji.png





The platforms of the journal are Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, Open Access, COPE, ICMJE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons, etc.

COPE-logo-300x199.jpgimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcQR6_qdgvxMP9owgnYzJ1M6CS_XzR_d7orTjA&usqp=CAU

icmje_1_orig.png

cc.logo.large.png

ncbi.pngimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcRBcJw8ia8S9TI4Fun5vj3HPzEcEKIvF_jtnw&usqp=CAU

ORCID_logo.png

1*mvsP194Golg0Dmo2rjJ-oQ.jpeg


Our Journal using the DergiPark system indexed are;

Ulakbim TR Dizin,  Index Copernicus, ICI World of JournalsDirectory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact FactorASOS Index, OpenAIRE, MIAR,  EuroPub, WorldCat (OCLC)DOAJ,  Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index


Our Journal using the DergiPark system platforms are;

Google, Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, ICJME, COPE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons, Open Access, and etc.


Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review". 

Our journal has adopted the Open Access Policy and articles in JHSM are Open Access and fully comply with Open Access instructions. All articles in the system can be accessed and read without a journal user.  https//dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jhsm/page/9535

Journal charge policy   https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jhsm/page/10912

Our journal has been indexed in DOAJ as of May 18, 2020.

Our journal has been indexed in TR-Dizin as of March 12, 2021.


17873

Articles published in Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine have open access and are licensed under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License.