Research Article

Dentists’ perceptions of factors influencing implant treatment demand according to tooth loss severity

Volume: 9 Number: 5 September 19, 2026

Dentists’ perceptions of factors influencing implant treatment demand according to tooth loss severity

Abstract

Aims: This study evaluated dentists’ perceptions of implant treatment demand and investigated factors perceived to influence patients’ decisions regarding implant therapy based on tooth loss severity. Methods: In this cross-sectional survey, 78 practicing dentists completed a validated 12-item questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all variables. Individual implant-related attitude items (Q8a-Q8f) were compared across five perceived tooth-loss categories using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by Dunn’s test with Bonferroni adjustment. Subgroup analyses according to specialty and clinical experience were performed using the Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results: Dentists generally perceived greater implant demand among patients with extensive tooth loss, though a substantial proportion considered demand independent of missing teeth. Comparison of implant-related attitude items showed a significant difference only for positive opinion toward implant treatment (Q8a, p=0.002, ε2=0.183). Pairwise comparisons revealed that the 2-3 missing teeth group had significantly lower Q8a scores than both the ≥6 missing teeth group (adjusted p=0.0015) and the independent-demand group (adjusted p=0.0046). Subgroup analyses indicated that dentists with ≤5 years of experience perceived patient age (Q8c) as a significantly more critical factor than those with 6-15 years of experience (adjusted p=0.040). No other professional variables significantly affected attitudes. Conclusion: Dentists’ positive opinions toward implant therapy and perceptions of patient age differ based on perceived tooth-loss severity and clinical experience. Perceived demand is shaped by diverse clinical and professional factors rather than tooth loss alone.

Keywords

References

  1. Friedman PK, Lamster IB. Tooth loss as a predictor of shortened longevity: exploring the hypothesis. Periodontol 2000. 2016;72(1):142-152. doi:10.1111/prd.12128
  2. Samur Ergüven S, Kalyoncuoglu UT. Effect of tooth loss on social appearance anxiety and oral health-related quality of life among dental students. JBACHS. 2021;5(3):165-170. doi:10.30621/jbachs.962192
  3. Kassebaum NJ, Bernabé E, Dahiya M, Bhandari B, Murray CJL, Marcenes W. Global burden of severe tooth loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2014;93(7 Suppl):20S-28S. doi:10.1177/0022034514537828
  4. Vogel R, Smith-Palmer J, Valentine W. Evaluating the health economic implications and cost-effectiveness of dental implants: a literature review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28(2):343-356. doi:10.11607/jomi.2921
  5. Buser D, Sennerby L, De Bruyn H. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions. Periodontol 2000. 2017;73(1):7-21. doi:10.1111/prd.12185
  6. Guillaume B. Dental implants: a review. Morphologie. 2016;100(331):189-198. doi:10.1016/j.morpho.2016.02.002
  7. Lang NP, Lindhe J, eds. Clinical Periodontology and Implant Dentistry. 6th ed. Wiley-Blackwell; 2015.
  8. Papaspyridakos P, Chen CJ, Singh M, Weber HP, Gallucci GO. Success criteria in implant dentistry: a systematic review. J Dent Res. 2012;91(3):242-248. doi:10.1177/0022034511431252

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Oral Implantology, Dental Public Health

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

September 19, 2026

Submission Date

June 9, 2026

Acceptance Date

July 24, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 9 Number: 5

APA
Erimli, G., Akbudak, M., & Gürgan, C. A. (2026). Dentists’ perceptions of factors influencing implant treatment demand according to tooth loss severity. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, 9(5), 1256-1264. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1966560
AMA
1.Erimli G, Akbudak M, Gürgan CA. Dentists’ perceptions of factors influencing implant treatment demand according to tooth loss severity. J Health Sci Med / JHSM. 2026;9(5):1256-1264. doi:10.32322/jhsm.1966560
Chicago
Erimli, Gözde, Melisa Akbudak, and Cem Abdulkadir Gürgan. 2026. “Dentists’ Perceptions of Factors Influencing Implant Treatment Demand According to Tooth Loss Severity”. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine 9 (5): 1256-64. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1966560.
EndNote
Erimli G, Akbudak M, Gürgan CA (September 1, 2026) Dentists’ perceptions of factors influencing implant treatment demand according to tooth loss severity. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine 9 5 1256–1264.
IEEE
[1]G. Erimli, M. Akbudak, and C. A. Gürgan, “Dentists’ perceptions of factors influencing implant treatment demand according to tooth loss severity”, J Health Sci Med / JHSM, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1256–1264, Sept. 2026, doi: 10.32322/jhsm.1966560.
ISNAD
Erimli, Gözde - Akbudak, Melisa - Gürgan, Cem Abdulkadir. “Dentists’ Perceptions of Factors Influencing Implant Treatment Demand According to Tooth Loss Severity”. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine 9/5 (September 1, 2026): 1256-1264. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1966560.
JAMA
1.Erimli G, Akbudak M, Gürgan CA. Dentists’ perceptions of factors influencing implant treatment demand according to tooth loss severity. J Health Sci Med / JHSM. 2026;9:1256–1264.
MLA
Erimli, Gözde, et al. “Dentists’ Perceptions of Factors Influencing Implant Treatment Demand According to Tooth Loss Severity”. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, vol. 9, no. 5, Sept. 2026, pp. 1256-64, doi:10.32322/jhsm.1966560.
Vancouver
1.Gözde Erimli, Melisa Akbudak, Cem Abdulkadir Gürgan. Dentists’ perceptions of factors influencing implant treatment demand according to tooth loss severity. J Health Sci Med / JHSM. 2026 Sep. 1;9(5):1256-64. doi:10.32322/jhsm.1966560

Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency: Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS].

The Directories (indexes) and Platforms we are included in are at the bottom of the page.

Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.

You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/2316/file/4905/show







The indexes of the journal are ULAKBİM TR Dizin, ICI World of Journals, DOAJ, Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact Factor, ASOS Index, WorldCat (OCLC), MIAR, OpenAIRE, Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index, Scilit, etc.

       images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRB9r6zRLDl0Pz7om2DQkiTQXqDtuq64Eb1Qg&usqp=CAU

500px-WorldCat_logo.svg.png

atifdizini.png

logo_world_of_journals_no_margin.png

images?q=tbn%3AANd9GcTNpvUjQ4Ffc6uQBqMQrqYMR53c7bRqD9rohCINkko0Y1a_hPSn&usqp=CAU

doaj.png  

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSpOQFsFv3RdX0lIQJC3SwkFIA-CceHin_ujli_JrqBy3A32A_Tx_oMoIZn96EcrpLwTQg&usqp=CAU

ici2.png

asos-index.png

drji.png





The platforms of the journal are Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, Open Access, COPE, ICMJE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons, etc.

COPE-logo-300x199.jpgimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcQR6_qdgvxMP9owgnYzJ1M6CS_XzR_d7orTjA&usqp=CAU

icmje_1_orig.png

cc.logo.large.png

ncbi.pngimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcRBcJw8ia8S9TI4Fun5vj3HPzEcEKIvF_jtnw&usqp=CAU

ORCID_logo.png

1*mvsP194Golg0Dmo2rjJ-oQ.jpeg


Our Journal using the DergiPark system indexed are;

Ulakbim TR Dizin,  Index Copernicus, ICI World of Journals, Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact Factor, ASOS Index, OpenAIRE, MIAR,  EuroPub, WorldCat (OCLC), DOAJ,  Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index


Our Journal using the DergiPark system platforms are;

Google, Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, ICJME, COPE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons, Open Access, and etc.


Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review". 

Our journal has adopted the Open Access Policy and articles in JHSM are Open Access and fully comply with Open Access instructions. All articles in the system can be accessed and read without a journal user.  https//dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jhsm/page/9535

Journal charge policy   https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jhsm/page/10912

Our journal has been indexed in DOAJ as of May 18, 2020.

Our journal has been indexed in TR-Dizin as of March 12, 2021.


17873

Articles published in Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine have open access and are licensed under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License.