Research Article

Monetizing Stranded Gas: Economic Analysis of Gas to Liquid Technologies in Nigeria

Volume: 20 Number: 1 March 31, 2025

Monetizing Stranded Gas: Economic Analysis of Gas to Liquid Technologies in Nigeria

Abstract

Nigeria, as a nation endowed with vast reserves of stranded hydrocarbon resources and she is faced with the challenge of monetizing these resources, which are often flared due to lack of appropriate infrastructures for utilization. This has led the country into exploring different innovative approaches to unlock the economic potential of these resources. Gas-to-Liquid (GTL) technology has been seen as one of the major technologies that provide answers that can assist the country to grow in its economy. This study delves into the economic analysis of Gas-to-Liquids (GTL) technologies to monetize stranded hydrocarbon reserves in Nigeria. The economic analysis of the GTL technologies in Nigeria was done taking the Fischer-Tropsch GTL (FT-GTL) plant in Niger Delta as a case study. It was economically evaluated for a plant capacity of 1,000 MMSCF/D of natural gas. This plant is primarily affected by the crude oil price. The major aspect of this economic analysis was done by using a Microsoft Excel template developed for this study. The template considered the various variables that affect the variability of the projects such as plant life, construction period, capital expenditure, tax, operating expenditure, depreciation schedules, etc. The economic model used four economic indicators namely net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), profitability index (PI) and payback period (PP) to analyze both projects in this study. The financial and economic analysis of each indicator was carried out using the technique of discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis. DCF analysis yielded project performance criteria such as net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR), which were obtained from the projects' cash flow under consideration. Sensitivity analyses were then carried out with different tornado plots by varying the values of some of the economic parameters and determining their impacts on the project performance criteria within predetermined ranges. The results revealed that the higher the CAPEX for each of the cases, the lower the NPV and hence the profitability of the project is seen. For GTL technology to be viable as a project and profitable, the CAPEX is a factor to be extensively considered and reviewed periodically to ensure that it is not unreasonably high. Furthermore, the results of the economic analysis obtained at the different case scenarios using the most likely values of the economic input parameters indicate that FT-GTL profitability is highly dependent on the crude oil price, capital expenditure (CAPEX), operating expenditure (OPEX) and discounting factors should each be given proper considerations and review before embarking on future GTL projects. Increased operating expenditures from the FT-GTL technology reduced the NPV and IRR thereby affecting project profitability and extending the payback period, increasing the time to recoup initial investments of the FT-GTL technology plant.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

University of Benin

Ethical Statement

Intellectual property

Thanks

Thanks

References

  1. Ahmed MM, Bello AA, Idris MN, (2012), Natural Gas Utilization and the Nigerian Gas-To-Liquid Project; An Opportunity to End Gas Flaring, Int. Emer. Trends Engin. & Dev., 2(2). 240-256. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285736728_Natural_gas_utilization_and_the_Nigerian_gas-to-liquid_project_an_opportunity_to_end_gas_flaring
  2. Akpomera E, Oghenekevwe O, (2017), Economic Assessment of Gas to Liquid (GTL) Technology in Nigeria. J. Natural Sci. Res., 7(22). 8-18.
  3. Al-Saadoon FT, (2005) Economics of GTL Plants. SPE 94380 Paper Presented at the SPE Hydrocarbon Economics and Evaluation Symposium in April 3-5 2005, Dallas, Texas, USA, Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/94380-MS
  4. Al-Shalchi W, (2006), Gas to Liquids Technology (GTL) Petroleum Expert, Baghdad 2006, https://pdfroom.com/books/gas-to-liquids-technology-2006/jb5qOBWBgxQ/download Capuano L, (2018) Annual Energy Outlook 2018, U.S. Energy Information Administration, Independent Statistics and Analysis, www.eia.gov
  5. Chikwe AO, Ukpai UCE, Elechi DU, Onyia OS, (2021) Comparative Economic Analysis of Liquefied Natural Gas Technology and Gas to Liquid Technology, Europ. J. Adv. Engin. & Tech., 8(10), 9-16. https://www.ijser.org/researchpaper/Comparative-Economic-Analysis-of-Gas-to-Liquid-and-Liquefied-Natural-Gas-Technologies.pdf
  6. Diugwu IA, Ikaiya MA, Musa M, Egila AE, (2013), The Effect of Gas Production, Utilization and Flaring on the Economic Growth of Nigeria. Natural Resour J., 4. 341–348. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/
  7. Dodaro J, (2015) Fischer-Tropsch Process. Submitted as Coursework for PH240, Stanford University. http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2010/ph240/liu1/
  8. Economides MJ, Aguirre M , Morales A , Naha S , Tijani H, Vargas L, (2005) The Economics of Gas to Liquids Compared to Liquefied Natural Gas, World Energy, 8(1). 136-140. https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/3053156/Yaz%25C4%25B1r.pdf? sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

General Geology

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

March 31, 2025

Submission Date

January 22, 2025

Acceptance Date

February 24, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 20 Number: 1

APA
Igbinere, S. A., & Eka, M. (2025). Monetizing Stranded Gas: Economic Analysis of Gas to Liquid Technologies in Nigeria. Journal of International Environmental Application and Science, 20(1), 38-55. https://izlik.org/JA29YR74AF
AMA
1.Igbinere SA, Eka M. Monetizing Stranded Gas: Economic Analysis of Gas to Liquid Technologies in Nigeria. J. Int. Environmental Application & Science. 2025;20(1):38-55. https://izlik.org/JA29YR74AF
Chicago
Igbinere, Sunday Agbons, and Marvellous Eka. 2025. “Monetizing Stranded Gas: Economic Analysis of Gas to Liquid Technologies in Nigeria”. Journal of International Environmental Application and Science 20 (1): 38-55. https://izlik.org/JA29YR74AF.
EndNote
Igbinere SA, Eka M (March 1, 2025) Monetizing Stranded Gas: Economic Analysis of Gas to Liquid Technologies in Nigeria. Journal of International Environmental Application and Science 20 1 38–55.
IEEE
[1]S. A. Igbinere and M. Eka, “Monetizing Stranded Gas: Economic Analysis of Gas to Liquid Technologies in Nigeria”, J. Int. Environmental Application & Science, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 38–55, Mar. 2025, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA29YR74AF
ISNAD
Igbinere, Sunday Agbons - Eka, Marvellous. “Monetizing Stranded Gas: Economic Analysis of Gas to Liquid Technologies in Nigeria”. Journal of International Environmental Application and Science 20/1 (March 1, 2025): 38-55. https://izlik.org/JA29YR74AF.
JAMA
1.Igbinere SA, Eka M. Monetizing Stranded Gas: Economic Analysis of Gas to Liquid Technologies in Nigeria. J. Int. Environmental Application & Science. 2025;20:38–55.
MLA
Igbinere, Sunday Agbons, and Marvellous Eka. “Monetizing Stranded Gas: Economic Analysis of Gas to Liquid Technologies in Nigeria”. Journal of International Environmental Application and Science, vol. 20, no. 1, Mar. 2025, pp. 38-55, https://izlik.org/JA29YR74AF.
Vancouver
1.Sunday Agbons Igbinere, Marvellous Eka. Monetizing Stranded Gas: Economic Analysis of Gas to Liquid Technologies in Nigeria. J. Int. Environmental Application & Science [Internet]. 2025 Mar. 1;20(1):38-55. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA29YR74AF

“Journal of International Environmental Application and Science”