Clean Air Act Compliance Issues with Implications for Renewable Energy Policy: A Comparative Study

Year 2026, Volume: 21 Issue: 1 , 40 - 51 , 15.03.2026

Mahfujul Islam , Jonathan Thompson , Kundan Kumar , İqra Panhwar , Dr Muhammad Ahsan Iqbal Dr Ahsan

https://izlik.org/JA22UW62RZ

Abstract

This study examines the regulatory and environmental aspects of biomass pyrolysis compared to the combustion aspects under the U.S. Clean Air Act (CAA) with respect to emissions, carbon sequestration, and the development of policy issues. This study is designed to resolve regulatory ambiguity within pyrolysis-developed technologies and traditional combustion technologies in their classification under sections 129 and 112 of the CAA. By comparing the two processes, the evaluation outcome of emissions profiles, including the possible reduction of nitrogen oxide and dioxin emissions during pyrolysis, and Greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation with a life cycle benefit, is achieved in this study. Findings show that pyrolysis, if properly optimized, has a lot of positive impact on the environment, including carbon sequestration in the form of biochar, and fewer emissions of pollutants than from incineration. However, there is still regulatory uncertainty and classification issues that hinder the advancement of technology. This study highlights the need for differentiated regulation of pyrolysis technologies for sustainable technology in the context of addressing public health and environmental justice. The implications are significant in relation to creating a cohesive regulatory framework that supports innovation and safety for the environment.

Keywords

Clean Air Act , Combustion technologies , Lignocellulosic biomass , Pyrolysis , Sustainable waste management , Renewable energy policy

Ethical Statement

The author has read, understood, and complied as applicable with the statement on "Ethical responsibilities of Authors" as found in theInstructions for Authors”. This research was based on literature data analysis.

References

• ACC (2024) ACC statement on ProPublica story about pyrolysis & advanced recycling. American Chemistry Council. https://www.americanchemistry.com/chemistry-in-america/ (accessed: 25.11.2025)
• ALL4., (2022) Will agencies regulate air emissions from pyrolysis and gasification units like they regulate air emissions from combustion units? https://www.all4inc.com/4-the-record-articles/will-agencies-regulate-air-emissions- / (accessed: 25.11.2025)
• Azzi E, Karltun E, Sundberg C, (2019) Prospective Life Cycle Assessment of Large-Scale Biochar Production and Use for Negative Emissions in Stockholm. Environ. Sci. & Tech., 53(14), 8466–8476. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01615
• Bell L, (2023) Chemical recycling: A dangerous deception. https://ipen.org/sites/default/ files/documents/ipen _recycling_report_11_16_23-compressed.pdf (accessed: 25.11.2025)
• Bridgwater AV, (2012) Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product upgrading. Biomass and Bioenergy, 38, 68–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.01.048
• Brownsort PA, (2009) Biomass pyrolysis processes: Performance parameters and their influence on biochar system benefits [Master's thesis, University of Edinburgh]. Edinburgh Research Archive. https://era.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/3116 (accessed: 25.11.2025)
• Canabarro N, Soares JF, Anchieta CG, Kelling CS, Mazutti MA, 2013. Thermochemical processes for biofuels production from biomass. Sustainable Chemical Processes, 1(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/2043-7129-1-22
• Chemical Recycling: Behind the Industry Hype - GAIA., (2021a) GAIA https://www.no-burn.org/resources/chemical-recycling-behind-the-industry-hype/ (accessed: November 16,2025) Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101–549, 104 Stat. 2399 (1990). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-104/pdf/STATUTE-104-Pg2399.pdf (accessed: November 13,2025) Conesa JA, Font R, Fullana A, Martín-Gullón I, Aracil I, Gálvez A, Moltó J, Gómez-Rico MF, )2009) Comparison between emissions from the pyrolysis and combustion of different wastes. Journal of Anal. and Appl. Pyrol., 84 (1), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2008.11.022
• Cusenza MA, Longo S, Cellura M, Guarino F, Messineo A, Mistretta M, Volpe M, (2021) Environmental assessment of a waste-to-energy practice: The pyrolysis of agro-industrial biomass residues. Sust. Produc. & Consump., 28, 866–876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.07.015
• Czajczyńska D, Anguilano L, Ghazal H, Krzyżyńska R, Reynolds AJ, Spencer N, Jouhara H, (2017) Potential of pyrolysis processes in the waste management sector. Ther. Sci. & Engin. Prog., 3, 171–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2017.06.003
• Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on Industrial Emissions (Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control), Pub. L. No. 2010/75/EU, Official Journal of the European Union 17 (2010). http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2010/75/oj (accessed: 18.11,2025)
• Dong J, Tang Y, Nzihou A, Chi Y, Weiss-Hortala E, Ni M, (2018) Life cycle assessment of pyrolysis, gasification and incineration waste-to-energy technologies: Theoretical analysis and case study of commercial plants. Sci. Total Environ., 626, 744–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.151
• FAO., 2024. Integrated Fire Management Voluntary Guidelines: Principles and Strategic Actions. FAO. https://openknowledge.fao.org/items/9229a6c3-d174-4d76-9c31-1c83d192f030 (accessed: November 17,2025)
• FRESH, (2025) https://www.freshlawblog.com/ (accessed: November 14,2025)
• IEA Bioenergy., 2024. Emissions from biomass combustion. IEA Bioenergy. https://www.ieabioenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Annual-Report-2023.pdf (accessed: 25.11.2025)
• IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 2018. Global warming of 1.5°C: https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/ (accessed: 19.11,2025)
• IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), (2021) Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/ (accessed: 25.11.2025)
• Kabir, E., Kim K-H, Kwon EE, (2023) Biochar as a tool for the improvement of soil and environment. Front. Environ. Sci., 11, 1324533. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1324533
• Kumar, K., Ding, L., Zhao, H., & Cheng, M.-H. (2023). Waste-to-Energy Pipeline through Consolidated Fermentation–Microbial Fuel Cell (MFC) System. Processes, 11(8), 2451. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11082451
• Kundu, K., Chatterjee, A., Bhattacharyya, T., Roy, M., & Kaur, A. (2018). Thermochemical Conversion of Biomass to Bioenergy: A Review. In Prospects of Alternative Transportation Fuels (pp. 235–268). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7518-6_11
• Kostakis, V., & Tsiouris, N., 2024. How to unite local initiatives for a more sustainable global future. Sustainable Futures, 7, 100187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100187
• Marin F, Tanislav OM, Constantinescu M, Roman A, Bucura F, Oancea S, Zaharioiu AM, (2025) Biochar for Soil Fertility and Climate Mitigation: Review on Feedstocks, Pyrolysis Conditions, Functional Properties, and Applications with Emerging AI Integration. Agriculture, 15(22), 2345. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15222345
• Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan. (2024). Waste Management and Public Cleansing Law (Law No. 137 of 1970). Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan. https://www.env.go.jp/en/recycle/basel_conv/files/Waste_Management_and_Public_Cleansing.pdf (accessed: November 14,2025)
• Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives. (2019). Briefing: False solutions to the plastic pollution crisis. United Nations Environment Programme. https://apps1.unep.org/resolutions/ uploads/gaia_briefing_to_unea_aheg_2.pdf (accessed: 25.11.2025)
• Muh E, Tabet F, Amara S, (2021). Biomass Conversion to Fuels and Value-Added Chemicals: A Comprehensive Review of the Thermochemical Processes. Current Alternative Energy, 4(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.2174/2405463103666191022121648
• Qu T, Guo W, Shen L, Xiao J, Zhao K, (2011) Experimental Study of Biomass Pyrolysis Based on Three Major Components: Hemicellulose, Cellulose, & Lignin. Indus. & Engin. Chem. Res., 50(18), 10424–10433. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie1025453
• Roberts KG, Gloy BA, Joseph S, Scott NR, Lehmann J, (2010a) Life Cycle Assessment of Biochar Systems: Estimating the Energetic, Economic, and Climate Change Potential. Environ. Sci. & Tech., 44(2), 827–833. https://doi.org/10.1021/es902266r
• Rollinson AN, Oladejo JM, (2020). Chemical recycling: Status, sustainability, and environmental impacts. Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives. https://www.no-burn.org/wp-content/uploads/CR-Technical-Assessment_June-2020.pdf (accessed: November 20,2025)
• Schwartz NR, Paulsen AD, Blaise MJ, Wagner AL, Yelvington PE, (2020) Analysis of emissions from combusting pyrolysis products. Fuel, 274, 117863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117863
• Andooz A, Eqbalpour M, Kowsari, E., Ramakrishna S, Ansari Cheshmeh Z, (2023) A comprehensive review on pyrolysis from the circular economy point of view and its environmental and social effects. J. Clean Prod., 388, Article 136021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136021
• Singla V, (2022) Recycling Lies: Chemical Recycling" of Plastic Is Just Greenwashing Incineration. Natural Resources Defense Council. https://www.nrdc.org/sites/ default/files/chemical-recycling-greenwashing-incineration-ib.pdf (accessed: November 14,2025)
• UNFCCC (2015) (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change), Paris Agreement. United Nations. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf (accessed: 25.11.2025)
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2025) Standards of performance for new stationary sources and emission guidelines for existing sources: Other solid waste incineration units review. Federal Register, 90(123), 27910–27971. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/06/30/2025-11446/ (accessed: 25.11.2025)
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1996) Municipal waste combustion: Summary of the requirements for Section 111(d)/129 state plans for implementing the municipal waste combustor emission guidelines (EPA-456/R-96-003). Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=2000FA6U.PDF (accessed: 25.11.2025)
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2005) Standards of performance for new stationary sources and emission guidelines for existing sources: Other solid waste incineration units. Federal Register, 70(241), 74870–74924. https://www.federalregister.gov/d/05-23716 (accessed: 25.11.2025)
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2006, November 24). Standards of performance for new stationary sources and emission guidelines for existing sources: Other solid waste incineration units. Federal Register, 71(226), 67802–67807. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/ 2006/11/24/E6-19865/ (accessed: 25.11.2025)
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2011) Identification of non-hazardous secondary materials that are solid waste. Federal Register, 76(55), 15456–15551. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2011 (accessed: 25.11.2025)
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2013). Commercial and industrial solid waste incineration units: Reconsideration and final amendments. Federal Register, 78(26), 9112–9213. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2013/02/07/2012-31632/ (accessed: 25.11.2025)
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2016). Additions to list of categorical non-waste fuels. Federal Register, 81(25), 6688–6743. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016 /02/08/2016-01866/additions-to-list-of-categorical (accessed: 25.11,2025)
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2020) Standards of performance for new stationary sources and emission guidelines for existing sources: Other solid waste incineration units review. Federal Register, 85(169), 54178–54232. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/08/31/2020-17730/ (accessed: 25.11.2025)
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (2021). Potential future regulation addressing pyrolysis and gasification units. Federal Register, 86(172), 50296–50303. https://www.federalregister.gov/ documents/ (accessed: 25.11,2025)
• U.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), (2021c) Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Pyrolysis and Gasification Units. EPA. https://www.epa.gov/stationary-sources-air-pollution/advance-notice-proposed-rulemaking-pyrolysis-and-gasification (accessed: 25.11.2025)
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2023) Standards of performance for new stationary sources and emission guidelines for existing sources: Other solid waste incineration units review; Withdrawal of proposed provision. Federal Register, 88(107), 36524–36525. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/06/05/2023-11476/ (accessed: 25.11.2025)
• U.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), (2023b) Withdrawal of Proposed Provision Removing Pyrolysis/Combustion Units from the Other Solid Waste Incineration Standards-Notice [Fact sheet]. https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2024-07/fact-sheet_withdrawal-notice_-may242023.pdf (accessed: 25.11.2025)
• U.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), (2023c) Identification of Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials That Are Solid Waste. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/rcra/identification-non-hazardous-secondary-materials-are-solid-waste accessed: 25.11.2025)
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2021) Advance notice of proposed rulemaking on pyrolysis and gasification units. https://www.epa.gov/stationary-sources-air-pollution/advance-notice-proposed-rulemaking-pyrolysis-and-gasification (accessed: 25.11,2025)
• U.S. EPA, (2015) Assessment of the potential costs, benefits, and other impacts of the final revisions to EPA’s underground storage tank regulations. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-07/documents/regs2015-ria.pdf (accessed: 25.11.2025)
• U.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), (2024) Commercial and industrial solid waste incineration units (CISWI): New source performance standards (NSPS), emission guidelines, and federal plan requirements. https://www.epa.gov/stationary-sources-air-pollution/commercial-and-industrial-solid-waste-incineration-units-ciswi-new (accessed: 15.11, 2025)
• U.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), (2024) National emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for source categories. https://www.epa.gov/stationary-sources-air-pollution/national-emission-standards-hazardous-air-pollutants-neshap (accessed: 25.11,2025)
• V, K. K., & Panwar, N. L. (2024). Pyrolysis technologies for biochar production in waste management: A review. Clean Energy, 8(4), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/ce/zkae036
• Vuppaladadiyam AK, Vuppaladadiyam SSV, Sahoo A, Murugavelh S, Anthony E, Bhaskar T, Zheng Y, Zhao M,
• Duan H, Zhao Y, Antunes E, Sarmah, AK., Leu S-Y, (2023). Bio-oil and biochar from the pyrolytic conversion of biomass: A current and future perspective on the trade-off between economic, environmental, and technical indicators. Sci. Total Environ., 857, 159155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159155
• Wang R, Na J, Li, X H., Li, Gu S, Gao X, (2021). Techno-economic and environmental evaluation of aldehyde-assisted chemical looping separation technology in coal-based and biomass-based ethylene glycol purification. J. Clean. Prod., 313, 127675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127675
• West Virginia v. EPA, (2022) 597 U.S. 697 Supreme Court of the United States. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1530_n758.pdf (accessed: November 15,2025)
• Winchell LJ, Ross JJ, Brose DA, Pluth TB, Fonoll X, Norton JW, Bell KY, (2022) Pyrolysis and gasification at water resource recovery facilities: Status of the industry. Water Environ Res, 94(3), e10701. https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.10701
• Woolf D, Amonette JE, Street-Perrott FA, Lehmann J, Joseph S, (2010a) Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change. Nature Comm, 1(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1053
• Woolf D, Lehmann J, Ogle S, Kishimoto-Mo AW, McConkey B, Baldock J, (2021) Greenhouse Gas Inventory Model for Biochar Additions to Soil. Environ. Sci. & Tech., 55(21), 14795–14805. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c02425
• WHO (World Health Organization), 2010. WHO guidelines for indoor air quality: Selected pollutants. WHO Regional Office for Europe. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789289002134 (accessed: 25.11.2025)
• Zaman CZ, Pal K, Yehye WA, Sagadevan S, Shah ST, Adebisi GA, Marliana E, Rafique RF, Johan RB, (2017) Pyrolysis: A Sustainable Way to Generate Energy from Waste. In M. Samer (Ed.), Pyrolysis. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.69036