The Relationship Between the Adorability of Urban Landscapes and Their Users Demographic Variables: The Case of Edremit, Van

Abstract

It is shown in the literature that people want to be more in preferred places and spend their time better when they are in the preferred place. User input is needed for evidence-based design that has developed in recent years. The determination of user preferences containing demographic information about urban landscapes creates important inputs for landscape architects and city planners. Van / Edremit District, which is considered rich in landscape assets, has made the distinction between the new settlement and the old settlement in terms of urbanization in recent years. In this study, the attitudes of different social groups towards space were investigated in determining the preferences of Edremit for the urban landscape and it was aimed to make suggestions for the improvement of the urban landscape. For this purpose, analyses were carried out to understand what demographic information affecting likes. Visual survey technique, which is applied with visuals and used to determine the perception of the user towards the space, is the main method of the study. The questionnaire was applied to 400 people, and according to the results of the analysis, it was seen that the level of education and income increased and the tastes of the senior occupational groups significantly decreased.

Keywords

• Demographic variables,Urban landscape,edremit,Van

Project Number

FBA-2018-7272

References

1. Acar C, Acar H, Demirbaş E, (2002) The Importance of Plants and Their Compositions to Prevent Visual Pollution in Urban Spaces, (In Turkish), Gazi University, Journal of Forestry Faculty-. V.2, No:2, ISSN 1303-2399. Kastamonu, s. 135-146.
2. Anonim, (2019) Governorship of Van. – www.van.gov.tr/ (connection on December 2019).
3. Aşur F, Alphan H, (2018) Visual Landscape Quality Assessment and The Impacts on Land Use Planning (In turkish). Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 28(1), 117-125.
4. Bozhüyük ZR, (2007) Visual Impact Assessment of Some Historical Buildings and Environment in Erzurum City Centre (In Turkish), Atatürk University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Department of Landscape Architecture. Erzurum.
5. Clay G R, Smidt R K, (2004) Assessing The Validity And Reliability of Descriptor Variables Used In Scenic High way Analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning, 66:239-255.
6. Çakcı I, (2007), A Research of Methodology For Visual Landscape Assessment In Landscape Planning (In Turkish), Ph. D. Thesis, Ankara University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Department of Landscape Architecture pp.117, Ankara, Türkiye.
7. Eagleman D, (2013) Incognito, Beynin Gizli Hayatı, Domingo yayınevi, çeviri: Z.Arık Tozar, pp.293, İstanbul, Türkiye.
8. Ekşioğlu G, (2010) Assessing the impacts of environmental aesthetics on residential property values using the hedonic price approach (In Turkish) Master Thesis, 9 Eylül University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Urban Design Department, pp. 175, İzmir, Türkiye.

9. Gulgun B, Guney MA, Aktaş E, Yazici K, (2014) Role of The Landscape Architecture İn Interdisciplinary Planning of Sustainable Cities. J. Environ. Protec. & Ecol, 15(4), 1877-1880.
10. Güngör S, Arslan M, (2004) Swot Analysis, Visual Quality Assessment, Preferences of Tourısm Facilities And Tourısm Facilıties' Conditional Analysis For Tourism and Recreational Strategies: Case Study For Beysehir Province (In Turkish). Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 18(33), 68-72.
11. Hall FC, (2001) Ground-Based Photograph Monitoring. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, General Technical Report, Pnw-Gtr-503.
12. Junker B, Buchecker M, (2008)Aesthetic preferences versus ecological objectives in river restorations, Landscape and Urban Planning, 85, 141–154.
13. Kalın A, (2004) Çevre Tercih ve Değerlendirmesinde Görsel Kalitenin Belirlenmesi ve Geliştirilmiş: Trabzon Sahil Bandı Örneği. K.T.Ü. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, Trabzon, 221 s.
14. Kaplan R, Kaplan S, And Ryan RL, (1998) With People in Mind: Design and Management of Everyday Nature. Washington ABD: Island Press, ISBN: 978-1559635943.
15. Nasar J L, (1992) “Visual Preferences in Urban Street Scenes A Cross-Cultural Comparison between Japan and the United States”. Environmental Aesthetics: Theory, Research, Applications. Editör: Nasar, J. Sayfa 260-274. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Oktay H E, (2017) Aesthetics In The Assessment of Palnting Landscape Designs: The Case Study of Antalya Konyaaltı Region, Ph.D. Thesis in Landscape Architecture, Akdeniz University, 226 p. Antalya.
17. Özvan H, Bostan P, (2019) Çeşitli Yöntemlerin Karşılaştırılması ile Görsel Estetik Kalite Değerlendirilmesi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 29(1), 159-167.
18. Polat AT, Güngör S, Adıyaman S, (2012) “The Relationships between and the Visual Quality of Urban Recreation Areas nearby the city of Konya and Demographic Characteristics of their Users” (In Turkish), KSÜ Journal of Natural Sciences, Special Issue 70-79.
19. Sevenant M, Antrop M, (2009) Cognitive Attributes and Aesthetic Preferences in assessment and Differentiation of Landscapes, Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 2889-2899.
20. Sezen I, Akpınar Külekçi E, Demircan N, Yılmaz S, (2011) Role of Women in The Use of Ornamental Plants in The Gardens of İndividual Houses: The Case of Erzurum, İnönü University Journal of Art and Design, 2, 939-946.
21. Sezen I, Akpınar Külekçi E, Keleş B, (2019) Visual Quality Analysis of Urban Roadside Trees for Autumn Color Effects: The Case of Erzurum City. Journal of Urban Academy, Volume: 12 Issue: 4, ISSN: 2146-9229.
22. Tuan YF, (1974) Topophilia, A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes, and Values, Columbia University Press, pp.260, USA.
23. Tveit M, Ode A˚, Fry G, (2006) Key Concepts in a Framework for Analysing Visual Landscape Character, Landscape Research, Vol. 31, No. 3, 229 – 255.
24. Todorova A, Asakawa S, Aikoh T, (2004) Preferences for and attitudes towards street flowers and trees in Sapporo, Japan, Landscape and Urban Planning,69: 403–416.
25. Yazıcı G, Kiper T, (2019) Determination of Spatial Preferences Based on Visual Perception in Urban Landscape: Case of Topkapı City Park. Journal of Urban Academy | Volume: 12 Issue: 4 | ISSN: 2146-9229.