A Planning Studio Experience in Landscape Architecture Education: Gökçeada Example

Abstract

The European Landscape Convention describes landscape planning as strong future actions for the development, improvement and creation of landscapes. In parallel to this, it also highlights the necessity to train landscape-related experts and to provide planning education in various educational institutions while stressing the importance of the sustainable planning of landscapes under various headings. Landscape architecture departments, which gave their first graduates in 1973, have since had a landscape planning infrastructure. This infrastructure constitutes an important place in the landscape architecture education process. Almost all landscape architecture departments in Turkey have landscape planning division. Landscape planning is also considered to be a necessary process for the protection and sustainable use of landscapes on a local, regional, territorial, and even global scale. Gökçeada, the largest island in Turkey, is one of the settlements which need sustainable land use decisions with its different natural and cultural landscape features. The island, which is in the process of declaring an organic agricultural center through the support of the Ministry and related provincial agencies while also trying to meet high tourism demands, is under the influence of different sectors in terms of future land use decisions. Thus, Gökçeada was selected as a field of study for the Project V (Planning Studio) course which was carried out during the fall semester of the 2016-2017 academic year by the Department of Landscape Architecture in the Faculty of Architecture and Design of Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University. In the operation of the studio, students experienced a planning process with all the steps, starting with the description of the subject and problem. In this study, as a result of the functioning of the Gökçeada landscape planning studio mentioned above as well as its gains and limitations for students and their research, spatial decisions for the future of the island have been put forward. In addition, the operational problems of landscape planning studios and their solutions have been expressed through the Gökçeada studio.

Keywords

• Landscape Planning Studio,Island Landscape,Gökçeada,Çanakkale

References

1. Acar H, Bekar M, (2017) A studio work in landscape architecture education: waterfront landscape design project (in Turkish). MEGARON 12(2), 329-342.
2. Alpak E.M, Özkan D.G, Düzenli T, (2018) Systems approach in landscape design: a studio work. Int J Technol Des Educ 28, 593–611.
3. Altanlar A, (2018) The basic design education in the context of the human-space relationship:"the city of Sofular neighbourhood an example of urban abstraction workshop" (in Turkish). JOSSE, 1(1),1-25
4. Avcı N, (2008) Gökçeada’da organik tarım ve organik ada. In Proceedings of Gökçeada Değerleri Sempozyumu pp. 85-88, Gökçeada, Çanakkale.
5. Cengiz T, Özcan H, Baytekin H, Altınoluk Ü, Kelkit A, Özkök F, Akbulak C, Kaptan Ayhan Ç, (2009) Gökçeada Arazi Kullanım Planlaması, TÜBİTAK Proje Sonuç Raporu Proje No: 107Y337
6. Çapa M, (2017) Restoring the Turkish sovereignity in Imbros and Tenedos after the Treaty of Lausanne (1923-1928): A report on the islands. (in Turkish) The Journal of Black Sea Studies, 11(22), 91-108.
7. Çetinkaya G, Uzun O, (2014) Peyzaj Planlama, Birsen Yayınevi, Ankara.
8. Dikmen B. Ç, (2011) Importance of the studio courses in architectural education: basic design studios. (in Turkish) Engineering Sciences, 6 (4), 1509-1520.

9. Erdoğan G, (2018) Studio experiences in planning education: Muğla (Menteşe) studio (in Turkish) MEGARON 13(4), 651-664 ESRI, (2016). ArcGIS 10.5 Software, Environmental Systems Research Institute, CA.
10. Gökçeada Kentsel Tasarım Rehberi, (2016). Atelye 70 Planners & Architects
11. Güney Marmara Kalkınma Ajansı, (2012) Çanakkale: Bozcaada & Gökçeada Değerlendirme Raporu 2012.
12. Kahraman S Ö, (2006) Effects of factors on disperse of settlement in Gökçeada (Imbros) from past today. (in Turkish) Coğrafya Dergisi, 14, 25-42.
13. Kaptan Ayhan Ç, Hepcan Ş, (2009) Developing a landscape planning approach for the areas having unique landscape characteristics: the case of Bozcaada (in Turkish), Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 6 (1), 93-105.
14. Konyalı A, Daş G, Savaş T, Yurtman İ.Y, (2004) Imbros sheep raising in Gökçeada: A potential for organic animal production. (in Turkish) In Proceedings of 2 1st International Congress on Organic Animal Production and Food Safety, Kuşadası, Turkey.
15. Official Gazette (2003) Law on the Approval of the Ratification of the European Landscape Convention. Retrieved June 24, 2019 from http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2003/06/20030617.htm#6 (in Turkish).
16. Özbek Ç, (2008) Antik çağda Gökçeada. In Proceedings of Gökçeada Değerleri Sempozyumu pp. 59-68, Gökçeada, Çanakkale.
17. Özdemir E, Kaptan Ayan Ç, (2019) The importance of the slow city movement for the conservation of cultural landscape in Gökçeada sample. (in Turkish) The Journal of Social Sciences Institute, Winter (Special Issue) 291-310.
18. Şahin Ç, (2015) AB Bölgesel Politikası Adalar ve Gökçeada. Beta Press, İstanbul.
19. Ter Ü, Derman S, (2018) Şehir planlama eğitiminde temel tasarım öğretisi: planlama stüdyosu 1 dersi deneyimi. Online Journal of Art and Design 6 (2) 132-147.
20. Turkish Statistical Institute, Pupulation Registration System, Retrieved March 1, 2020 from https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?kn=95&locale=tr (in Turkish).
21. Uzun O, Gültekin P, Karadağ A, Müderrisoğlu H, Uzun S, Kaplan A, Mansuroğlu S, Alphan H, Açıksöz S, Ayhan Ç, (2019) Türkiye’de peyzaj planlama dersi ve peyzaj planlama stüdyosu deneyimleri, In: 50. Yılında Peyzaj Mimarlığı Eğitimi ve Öğretimi (Ed. By O. Uzun, P. Köylü, S. Özdede Bacı, P. Gültekin and H. Müderrrisoğlu) pp 144-154. Düzce Üniversitesi Yayınları No:9, Orman Fakültesi Eğitim Dizisi: 1, Pelin Ofset, Ankara.
22. Yaşar Y, Düzgüneş E, (2013) Integration of sustainability concept to landscape design: a studio work. (in Turkish) İnönü University Journal of Art and Design 3 (7) 31-43.
23. Yılmaz Kaya M, Uzun O, (2019) Evaluation of the relationship between ecosystem services and spatial planning in landscape planning framework (in Turkish) Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 7, 2166- 2193.