Karayolu alttemel tabakalarında sıkıştırma kontrolü için hafif deflektometre testinin güvenilirliğinin SPSS analizi ile değerlendirilmesi

Abstract

Karayolu temel/alttemel tabakalarının durumu, yol kaplamasının dayanıklılığı ve performansı için kritik öneme sahiptir. Sıkıştırma kontrolü, bu tabakaların trafik yüklerini destekleme kabiliyetini, mukavemetini ve kararlılığını belirlemede önemli bir rol oynar. Alttemel tabakalarının sıkıştırma oranını değerlendirmek için nükleer yoğunluk ölçer (NDG) ve kum konisi gibi çeşitli yöntemler kullanılmaktadır. Bu yöntemlerin de bazı sınırlamaları ve zorlukları vardır. Zemin sıkışma oranının belirlenmesinde NDG testi kullanılırken, rijilik modülünün (Emod) belirlenmesinde ise nispeten daha pratik, taşınabilir ve tahribatsız bir yöntem olarak hafif ağırlıklı deflektometre (LWD) testi kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, LWD ve NDG test bulguları arasında bir korelasyon olup olmadığı incelenerek testlerin birbiri yerine kullanılıp kullanılamayacağı araştırılmıştır. Korelasyonun istatistiksel analizi SPSS analizi kullanılarak yapılmıştır.

Keywords

• Nükleer yoğunluk ölçer (NDG)
• Hafif ağırlıklı deflektometre (LWD)
• Sıkışma kontrolü
• Rijitlik modülü
• SPSS analizi

Assessing the reliability of the lightweight deflectometer test for compaction control in highway subbase layers through SPSS analysis

Abstract

The condition of the highway base/subbase layers is critical for the durability and performance of the road pavement. Compaction control plays an important role in determining the ability of these layers to support traffic loads, their strength and stability. Various methods are used to evaluate the compaction rate of subbase layers; such as nuclear density gauge (NDG) and sand cone. These methods also have their own limitations and difficulties. While the NDG test is used to determine the compaction percentages, the lightweight deflectometer (LWD) test is used as a relatively more practical, portable and non-destructive method to measure the surface stiffness modulus (Emod). In this study, the possibility of using the surface stiffness modulus obtained by the LWD test in the subbase layer instead of each other is investigated by establishing a correlation between the compaction percentages determined by the NDG test. To investigate how well the LWD results are in line with established methods, only correlation and regression analysis of SPSS software are focused on. Correlation analysis helped us assess the strength and direction of the relationships between LWD modulus values and compaction percentages, while regression analysis provided insights into the predictive capability of LWD in estimating compaction outcomes. These methods helped evaluate the reliability and accuracy of LWD as a compaction control tool, providing a deeper understanding of the role of LWD in highway subbase layer assessment.

Keywords

• Nuclear density gauge (NDG)
• Lightweight deflectometer (LWD)
• Compaction control
• Stiffness modulus
• SPSS analysis

References

1. Jitareekul P, Sawangsuriya A, Singhatiraj P (2017) Integration of pavement layer evaluation using LWD for road safety control. Procedia Engineering 189:111-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.05.019.
2. Technical Guide, L-G-002, Field density testing by using a nuclear density gauge. Transport, February 2015.
3. https://www.utest.com.tr/tr/20348/nukleer-yogunluk-olcum-cihazi#:~:text=do%c4%9frudan%20iletim%20y%c3%b6ntemi%2030%20santime,asfalt%20ve%20beton%20tabakalar%c4%b1nda%20uygulan%c4%b1r, accessed on 29.11.2024
4. ASTM D 6938-23 (2023) Standard test methods for in-place density and water content of soil and soil aggregate by nuclear methods (shallow depth). American Society for Testing and Materials, 1-11.
5. Fleming PR, Frost MW, Rogers CDF (2000) A comparison of devices for measuring the in-situ stiffness of highway foundation materials. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport 141(2):67-72.
6. Jakubinek R, Horvat M (2012) Correlation between light weight deflectometer and traditional methods in road construction. Journal of Pavement Engineering 17(3):142-150.
7. Schmalz A, Wagner S, Koch T (2014) Evaluating the use of light weight deflectometers in road construction projects: A comparison with standard density tests. Int J of Geotechnical Eng 8(2):65-72.
8. Wu J, Xu Q, Li L (2013) Evaluation of lightweight deflectometer for compaction quality control of unbound granular base. Int J of Pavement Eng 14(4):358-367.

9. Fleming PR, Frost MW, Lambert JP (2007) Review of lightweight deflectometer for routine in situ assessment of pavement material stiffness. Transportation Research Record 2004(1):80-87. https://doi.org/10.3141/2004-09
10. Singh N, Mejia C, Martison T, Shah F, Fleming C, Fitzpatrick J (2010) Use of the light weight deflectometer (LWD) at Highland Valley Copper Mine. Proceedings from the 63rd Canadian Geotechnical Conference, Alberta, Canada, 12-16.
11. Rahman F, Hossain M, Hunt MM, Romanoschi SA (2008) Soil stiffness evaluation for compaction control of cohesionless embankments. Geotechnical Testing J,31(5):442-451. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ100971
12. Livneh M, Goldberg Y (2001) Quality assessment during road formation and foundation construction: Use of falling-weight deflectometer and light drop weight. Trans Res Rec: J of the Trans Res Board 1755:69-77. https://doi:10.3141/1755-08
13. Steinert BC (2005) Field and laboratory evaluation of the portable falling weight deflectometer. Electronic Theses and Dissertations, https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/856
14. ASTM E2583-07 (2020) Standard test method for measuring deflections with a light weight deflectometer (LWD). American Society for Testing and Materials, 1-3.
15. Türkiye Department of Transportation (TürkiyeDOT) (2013) Technical Specification, Ankara, Section 401, 1-6.