Research Article

Estimation of power outputs of two different photovoltaic solar panels with different heuristic algorithms

Volume: 5 Number: 2 July 31, 2025
EN TR

Estimation of power outputs of two different photovoltaic solar panels with different heuristic algorithms

Abstract

The estimation of the power values obtained from photovoltaic (PV) systems is of critical importance for the reliable and economical use of solar energy panels. This estimation affects many processes, starting from the installation phase of solar panels to guiding electricity companies, energy management, and distribution. At the same time, it is necessary to detect the adaptations of solar panels in a timely manner and reach the optimal production capacity to provide the most efficient energy production. In this context, Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) were used to estimate the power values obtained from PV panels. In this study, heuristic algorithms such as Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Genetic Algorithm (GA), Clonal Selection Algorithm (CSA), Ant Colony Optimization, and Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) were used to estimate the power values obtained from monocrystalline and polycrystalline photovoltaic panels. In the verification of the estimation results, the most common statistical evaluation criteria, Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and Variance (R2) equations were used. The estimation values made with the PSO algorithm were the closest to the real values. 98.95% estimation was achieved in monocrystalline photovoltaic solar panels and 93.94% in polycrystalline photovoltaic solar panels.

Keywords

References

  1. Gan L, Xiong Q, Chen X, Lin Z, Wen J (2025) Optimal dispatch schedule for the coordinated hydro-wind-photovoltaic system with non-priority output utilizing combined meta-heuristic. Omega 103198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2024.103198
  2. Beşkirli A, Dağ İ, Kiran MS (2024) A tree seed algorithm with multi-strategy for parameter estimation of solar photovoltaic models. Applied Soft Computing 167:112220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2024.112220
  3. Duman S, Kahraman HT, Sonmez Y, Guvenc U, Kati M, Aras S (2022) A powerful meta-heuristic search algorithm for solving global optimization and real-world solar photovoltaic parameter estimation problems. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 111:104763, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2022.104763
  4. Yu Y, Wang K, Zhang T, Wang Y, Peng C, Gao S (2022) A population diversity-controlled differential evolution for parameter estimation of solar photovoltaic models. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 51:101938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101938
  5. Liang Z, Wang Z, Mohamed AW (2024) A novel hybrid algorithm based on improved marine predators’ algorithm and equilibrium optimizer for parameter extraction of solar photovoltaic models. Heliyon 10:19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38412
  6. Gani A, Sekkeli M (2022) Experimental evaluation of type-2 fuzzy logic controller adapted to real environmental conditions for maximum power point tracking of solar energy systems. International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications 50:4131-4145. https://doi.org/10.1002/cta.3374
  7. Mojallizadeh MR, Badamchizadeh M, Khanmohammadi S, Sabahi M (2016) Designing a new robust sliding mode controller for maximum power point tracking of photovoltaic cells. Solar Energy 132:538-546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2016.03.038
  8. Lorenz E, Hurka J (2009) Irradiance forecasting for the power prediction of grid-connected photovoltaic systems. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing 5:2-10.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Electrical Engineering (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

July 31, 2025

Submission Date

January 15, 2025

Acceptance Date

March 27, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 5 Number: 2

APA
Karakan, A. (2025). Estimation of power outputs of two different photovoltaic solar panels with different heuristic algorithms. Journal of Innovative Engineering and Natural Science, 5(2), 568-587. https://doi.org/10.61112/jiens.1620198
AMA
1.Karakan A. Estimation of power outputs of two different photovoltaic solar panels with different heuristic algorithms. JIENS. 2025;5(2):568-587. doi:10.61112/jiens.1620198
Chicago
Karakan, Abdil. 2025. “Estimation of Power Outputs of Two Different Photovoltaic Solar Panels With Different Heuristic Algorithms”. Journal of Innovative Engineering and Natural Science 5 (2): 568-87. https://doi.org/10.61112/jiens.1620198.
EndNote
Karakan A (July 1, 2025) Estimation of power outputs of two different photovoltaic solar panels with different heuristic algorithms. Journal of Innovative Engineering and Natural Science 5 2 568–587.
IEEE
[1]A. Karakan, “Estimation of power outputs of two different photovoltaic solar panels with different heuristic algorithms”, JIENS, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 568–587, July 2025, doi: 10.61112/jiens.1620198.
ISNAD
Karakan, Abdil. “Estimation of Power Outputs of Two Different Photovoltaic Solar Panels With Different Heuristic Algorithms”. Journal of Innovative Engineering and Natural Science 5/2 (July 1, 2025): 568-587. https://doi.org/10.61112/jiens.1620198.
JAMA
1.Karakan A. Estimation of power outputs of two different photovoltaic solar panels with different heuristic algorithms. JIENS. 2025;5:568–587.
MLA
Karakan, Abdil. “Estimation of Power Outputs of Two Different Photovoltaic Solar Panels With Different Heuristic Algorithms”. Journal of Innovative Engineering and Natural Science, vol. 5, no. 2, July 2025, pp. 568-87, doi:10.61112/jiens.1620198.
Vancouver
1.Abdil Karakan. Estimation of power outputs of two different photovoltaic solar panels with different heuristic algorithms. JIENS. 2025 Jul. 1;5(2):568-87. doi:10.61112/jiens.1620198


by.png
Journal of Innovative Engineering and Natural Science by İdris Karagöz is licensed under CC BY 4.0