INVESTIGATION OF IMPACTED SUPERNUMERARY TEETH: A CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPH (CBCT) STUDY
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the impacted supernumerary teeth which were initially detected on panoramic radiographs by using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, supernumerary teeth diagnosed on panoramic radiographs taken from patients who had admitted for routine dental treatment were evaluated using CBCT. Patients’ age, gender, systemic conditions as well as number of supernumerary teeth, unilateral-bilateral presence, anatomical localization (maxilla, mandible, anterior-premolar-molar, mesiodens-lateral-canine, parapremolar-paramolar-distomolar) shape (rudimentary, supplemental, tuberculate, odontoma), position (palatal-lingual-buccal-labial-central), shortest distance between the tooth and adjacent cortical plate, complications and treatment were assessed.
Results: A total of 47 impacted supernumerary teeth in 34 patients were investigated in this study. Of these, 33 (70.2%) were unilateral and 14 (29.8%) were bilateral. Only 1 supernumerary tooth was found in 27 patients (79.4%) whereas 7 patients (20.6%) had 2 or more supernumerary teeth. Most of the teeth located in the anterior region (74.4%) of the jaws and maxilla (74.4%). Twenty teeth (42.5%) were mesiodens, 11 (23.4%) were lateral or canine, 14 (29.7%) were parapremolar and 2(4.4%) were distomolar. Twenty-seven teeth (57.4%) were rudimentary, 15 (31.9%) supplemental and 5 (10.7%) odontoma in shape. The shortest distance between the supernumerary tooth and adjacent cortical plate varied between 0 to 2.5 mm with a mean of 0.66 mm. The most common clinical complaint was the non-eruption of permanent teeth (42.5%). All supernumerary teeth were removed under local anesthesia. Orthodontic traction was performed for those impacted permanent teeth if necessary.
Conclusion: Impacted supernumerary teeth are usually in close proximity to cortical bone. Although this may facilitate surgical access, there is a risk of damaging surrounding anatomical structures. Therefore, CBCT evaluation of impacted supernumerary teeth for accurate planning is recommended.
Keywords
References
- Altuğ HA, Altuğ H, Sarı E, Şençimen M, Altun C. Süt ve daimi dentisyonda süpernümere dişlerin teşhisi, cerrahi ve ortodontik olarak tedavileri. GÜ Diş Hek Fak Derg 2010;27(2):77-82.
- Erdem MA, Çankaya B, Güven G, Kasapoğlu Ç. Artı dişler (süpernümerer dişler). İst Üni Dis Hek Fak Derg 2011;45(1):15-18.
- Kaya GS, Yapici G, Omezli MM, Dayi E. Non-syndromic supernumerary premolars. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2011;16(4):e522-525.
- Masih S, Sethi HS, Singh N, Thomas AM. Differential expressions of bilaterally unerupted supernumerary teeth. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2011;29(4):320-322.
- Acikgoz A, Acikgoz G, Tunga U, Otan F. Characteristics and prevalence of non-syndrome multiple supernumerary teeth: A retrospective study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35(3):185-190.
- Bereket C, Çakır Özkan N, Şener İ, Tek M, Çelik S. Sürnümerer molar dişlerin retrospektif olarak incelenmesi: Klinik ve radyolojik bir çalışma. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2010;20(3):176-180.
- Brauer HU. Case report: Non-syndromic multiple supernumerary teeth localized by cone beam computed tomography. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2010;11(1):41-43.
- Scheiner MA, Sampson WJ. Supernumerary teeth: A review of the literature and four case reports. Aust Dent J 1997;42(3):160-165.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
-
Publication Date
October 2, 2017
Submission Date
November 5, 2016
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 2017 Volume: 51 Number: 3