Language choice and identity: An investigation based on the comparison of language attitudes from two different localities

Öz

This current research tries to compare and contrast the language attitudes of Arabic-Turkish bilinguals from Mersin and Hatay cities located in the East Mediterranean Region of Anatolia. The quantitative results of the language attitude surveys conducted in the two cities by two different researchers (Çetintaş Yıldırım, 2019; Kocaoğlu, 2019) are compared, and qualitative conclusions which can be generalized to the population of Arabic-Turkish bilinguals are obtained. Two different but related themes (language choices and the sense of belonging to a social/cultural identity of the two participant groups) consist of the main focus. Four sets of questions for the identity theme and seven sets of questions for the language choice theme were determined from the surveys and the means of each group for every question were compared and interpreted. The comparison reveals that Arabic-Turkish bilinguals from Hatay interiorize Arabic language more than Arabic-Turkish bilinguals from Mersin. The first group is more inclined to use Arabic in their professional career and transfer it to the new generations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• language choice; social/cultural identity; language attitudes; Arabic-Turkish bilingualism

Kaynakça

1. Agheyisi, R. and Fishman, J. A. (1970). Language Attitudes Studies: A Brief Survey of Methodological Approaches, Anthropological Linguistics, 12 (5), 137-157
2. Andrews, P. A. (Ed.). (1989). Ethnic Groups in The Republic of Turkey. Weisbaden: Verlag
3. Antonova_Ünlü, E. et al. (2015). Russian Immigrant Diaspora in Turkey: Language Use, Preference and Attitudes, Turkish Studies, 16:3, 391-410 DOI: 10.1080/14683849.2015.1067864
4. Antonova-Ünlü, E. et al. (2016). Türkiye’de Yaşayan İngiliz Kökenli Göçmenlerin Dil Kullanım, Tercih ve Tutumları, YILDIZ Journal of Educational Research, 1 (1), 56-76
5. Atsız Gökdağ, B. (2011). Doğu Karadeniz’de Konuşulan Diller ve Türkçe ile Etkileşimleri, Karadeniz Araştırmaları, 31, 111-134
6. Bangeni, B. and Kapp, R. (2007). Shifting Language Attitudes in Linguistically Diverse Learning Environment in South Africa, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 28:4, 253-269 DOI: 10.2167/jmmd495.0
7. Büyükkantarcıoğlu, S. N. (2006). Toplumsal Gerçeklik ve Dil. İstanbul: Multilingual
8. Büyüköztürk, Ş. et al (2016). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem

9. Cargile, A. C. and Giles, H. (1997). Understanding Language Attitudes: Exploring Listener Affect and Identity, Language and Communication, 17 (3), 195-217
10. Cengiz, A. K. (2006). Dil-Kültür İlişkisi Açısından Hatay’da İkidillilik. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü: Hatay
11. Choi, J. K. (2003). Language Attitudes and The Future of Bilingualism: The Case of Paraguay. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 6:2, 81-94 DOI: 10.1080/13670050308667774
12. Çetinkaya, S. (2017). Çokdillilik ve Kimlik. The Journal of International Social Research, 10 (50), 371-377
13. Author. (2019). The Language Attitudes of Mersin Arabs in Turkey: Scrutinizing from Five Different Perspectives. In, Kara, Ö. T. and Ulum, Ö. G. (Eds.). Language and Literature II, pp 59-85. Ankara: Akademisyen
14. Edwards, J. (1999). Refining Our Understanding of Language Attitudes. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18 (1), 101-110
15. Gawronski, B. (2007). Attitudes Can Be Measured! But What Is an Attitude? Social Cognition, 25 (5), 573-581
16. Karahan, F. (2005). Bilingualism in Turkey. Cohen, J. et al (Eds.). Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Bilingualism, pp1152-1166. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla
17. KONDA (2017). Biz Kimiz? Toplumsal Yapı Araştırması. Retrieved on November 8, 2019 from: http://www.Konda.com.tr/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/2006_09_KONDA_Toplumsal_Yapi.pdf
18. Kocaoğlu, G. (2019). Language Attitudes of Arabic-Turkish Bilingual Speakers in Hatay Towards Arabic and Turkish. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Mersin University Institute of Social Sciences: Mersin
19. Liebscher, G. and Dailey-O’Cain, J. (2009). Language Attitudes in Interaction, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 13/2, 195-222
20. Sofu, H. (2009). Language Shift or Maintenance within Three Generations: Examples from Three Turkish-Arabic-Speaking Families, International Journal of Multilingualism, 6:3, 246-257 DOI: 10.1080/14790710902878684
21. Thisaphungo Mukhuba, T. (2005). Bilingualism, Language Attitudes, Language Policy and Language Planning: A Sociolinguistic Perspective, Journal of Language and Learning, 3 (2), 268-278
22. Weisman, E. M. (2001). Bicultural Identity and Language Attitudes: Perspectives of Four Latina Teachers, Urban Education, 36 (2), 203-225
23. Yalınkılıç, K. and Yağmur, K. (2014). Batı Trakya Türklerinin Anadillerine ve Kültürlerine Karşı Tutumları, Bilig, 70, 283-306
24. Yıldırım, A. and Şimşek, H. (2018). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin