Research Article

Resident Doctors' Experiences in Breaking Bad News: The Level of Using Spikes Protocol and Related Factors

Volume: 1 Number: 2 August 14, 2024
EN

Resident Doctors' Experiences in Breaking Bad News: The Level of Using Spikes Protocol and Related Factors

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: This study aimed to determine assistant doctors' experiences of giving bad news, their use of the SPIKES protocol, and effective factors. Methods: The study was conducted at Atatürk University Faculty of Medicine between September-December 2017 with 232 assistant doctors. The participants' experiences of delivering bad news were assessed using a questionnaire based on the SPIKES protocol. The questionnaire, consisting of 20 questions on a five-point Likert scale, covered six key areas: environment, perception, invitation, information, affect, and plan-summary. Factors that could affect participants' methods of breaking bad news were questioned. Significance level was accepted as P<.05. Results: Of the participants, 57.3% (n=133 were male, 57.3% (n=133) were married, and 70.3% (n=163) were working in internal sciences. Mean age was 29±3.5 years, and mean total working time was 4.5±3.3 years. 64.7% (n=150) had no pre-graduation training in giving bad news, and 90.9% (n=211) had no post-graduation training. 38% felt competent, 35.8% found difficulty in giving bad news. 60.8% devoted enough time to interviews, 24.1% arranged quiet rooms, and 43.1% used warning sentences, and 75.9% empathized, 69% had quiet rooms during interviews. All participants allowed their emotions, and 84.9% made eye contact. Male participants introduced themselves more frequently than females before interviews (P<.05). Conclusion: To gain the skill of giving bad news of assistant doctors the training needs should be met and they should be supported. More training and experience in areas such as setting the environment, invitation and information are important, especially for the full implementation of the SPIKES protocol.

Keywords

References

  1. Dean A, Willis S. The use of protocol in breaking bad news: evidence and ethos. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2016;22(6):265-271.
  2. Atabay G. Kötü haber verme. Çınar Tanrıverdi E, editör. Tıp Eğitiminde İletişim Becerileri. 1. Baskı. Ankara: Türkiye Klinikleri; 2021. p.40-44. (in Turkish)
  3. Fields SA, Johnson WM. Physician-patient communication: breaking bad news. W V Med J. 2012;108(2):32-35.
  4. Tanrıverdi EC. Tıpta Kötü Haber Verme. In Aile Hekimliğinde Güncel Yaklaşımlar. Ed. Akpınar E. Bölüm 9. Akademisyen Kitabevi. Ankara, 2019. (in Turkish)
  5. Kaplan M. SPIKES: a framework for breaking bad news to patients with cancer. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2010;14(4):514-516.
  6. Paul C, Clinton-McHarg T, Sanson-Fisher R, Douglas H, Webb G. Are we there yet? The state of the evidence base for guidelines on breaking bad news to cancer patients. European Journal of Cancer. 2009;45(17):2960-2966.
  7. Baile WF, Buckman R, Lenzi R, Glober G, Beale E, Kudelka AP. SPIKES—a six-step protocol for delivering bad news: application to the patient with cancer. The oncologist. 2000;5(4):302-11.
  8. Anuk D, Alçalar N, Sağlam EK, Bahadır G. Breaking bad news to cancer patients and their families: Attitudes toward death among Turkish physicians and their communication styles. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2022;40(1):115-130.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Family Medicine

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

August 14, 2024

Submission Date

July 9, 2024

Acceptance Date

August 12, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 1 Number: 2

APA
Dilfiruz, B. Ç., Çayır, Y., & Çınar Tanrıverdi, E. (2024). Resident Doctors’ Experiences in Breaking Bad News: The Level of Using Spikes Protocol and Related Factors. Journal of Medical Education and Family Medicine, 1(2), 59-65. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13310409
AMA
1.Dilfiruz BÇ, Çayır Y, Çınar Tanrıverdi E. Resident Doctors’ Experiences in Breaking Bad News: The Level of Using Spikes Protocol and Related Factors. J Med Educ Family Med. 2024;1(2):59-65. doi:10.5281/zenodo.13310409
Chicago
Dilfiruz, Banu Çiçek, Yasemin Çayır, and Esra Çınar Tanrıverdi. 2024. “Resident Doctors’ Experiences in Breaking Bad News: The Level of Using Spikes Protocol and Related Factors”. Journal of Medical Education and Family Medicine 1 (2): 59-65. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13310409.
EndNote
Dilfiruz BÇ, Çayır Y, Çınar Tanrıverdi E (August 1, 2024) Resident Doctors’ Experiences in Breaking Bad News: The Level of Using Spikes Protocol and Related Factors. Journal of Medical Education and Family Medicine 1 2 59–65.
IEEE
[1]B. Ç. Dilfiruz, Y. Çayır, and E. Çınar Tanrıverdi, “Resident Doctors’ Experiences in Breaking Bad News: The Level of Using Spikes Protocol and Related Factors”, J Med Educ Family Med, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 59–65, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13310409.
ISNAD
Dilfiruz, Banu Çiçek - Çayır, Yasemin - Çınar Tanrıverdi, Esra. “Resident Doctors’ Experiences in Breaking Bad News: The Level of Using Spikes Protocol and Related Factors”. Journal of Medical Education and Family Medicine 1/2 (August 1, 2024): 59-65. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13310409.
JAMA
1.Dilfiruz BÇ, Çayır Y, Çınar Tanrıverdi E. Resident Doctors’ Experiences in Breaking Bad News: The Level of Using Spikes Protocol and Related Factors. J Med Educ Family Med. 2024;1:59–65.
MLA
Dilfiruz, Banu Çiçek, et al. “Resident Doctors’ Experiences in Breaking Bad News: The Level of Using Spikes Protocol and Related Factors”. Journal of Medical Education and Family Medicine, vol. 1, no. 2, Aug. 2024, pp. 59-65, doi:10.5281/zenodo.13310409.
Vancouver
1.Banu Çiçek Dilfiruz, Yasemin Çayır, Esra Çınar Tanrıverdi. Resident Doctors’ Experiences in Breaking Bad News: The Level of Using Spikes Protocol and Related Factors. J Med Educ Family Med. 2024 Aug. 1;1(2):59-65. doi:10.5281/zenodo.13310409

Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License

30617