Utilizing Artificial Intelligence for Adaptive Scenario Development in Interprofessional Education

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) enabled scriptwriting for interprofessional education is a novel approach that develop realistic and complex educational scenarios for healthcare professionals. This method enhances the quality of interprofessional education and addresses pedagogical challenges that educators face. One notable advantage of AI in scriptwriting is the ability to create scenarios that reflect diverse and dynamic patient interactions, enabling students to engage in realistic problem solving. AI algorithms can analyze vast amounts of data regarding patient cases, treatment protocols, and clinician workflows. This leads to the creation of highly contextualized scenarios that capture the nuances of interprofessional collaboration in healthcare settings. Moreover, AI-enabled tools can facilitate personalized learning experiences by adjusting the complexity and content individual learner data. This adaptability ensures that each student can engage with material tailored to their specific knowledge level and learning objectives, thereby maximizing the learning experience. However, despite these advantages, relying solely on AI for script development is limited. One significant concern involves the potential loss of human insight in crafting scenarios that are sensitive to the emotional and ethical dimensions of healthcare. While AI can manage data-driven aspects of scenario creation, the subtleties of human interaction, empathy, and ethical conflict resolution may not be fully captured in automated narratives. Consequently, educators must ensure that AI-generated content is supplemented with human oversight, incorporating real-world experiences and ethical considerations that enrich the learning process. Educators from various health professions must work together to ensure that scripts generated by AI reflect the complexities and interdependencies of real clinical scenarios. AI-assisted scenarios offer adaptive and personalized learning experiences by tailoring content to learners' needs and professional roles. These systems can increase efficiency in scenario creation, enhance student engagement, and provide real-time, data-driven feedback. However, AI-generated content may lack the emotional depth and ethical nuance essential to interprofessional collaboration. Overreliance on AI also risks reducing critical thinking and creativity, while concerns such as algorithmic bias and data privacy must be carefully addressed to ensure equitable educational practices.

Keywords

• Interprofessional Education (IPE)
• Scenario-Based Learning (SBL)
• AI-Assisted Simulation
• Healthcare Collaboration
• Medical Education Technology

References

1. IPEC (Interprofessional Educational Collaborative) Executive Board. IPEC Core Competencies for Interprofessional Collaborative Practice: Version 3.; 2023.
2. Vanclay L. Interprofessional Education: What, How & When. Centre for the Advancement of Interprofessional Education.; 1997.
3. World Health Organization (WHO). Primary Health Care: Report of the International Conference on Primary Health Care.; 1978. Accessed February 6, 2023. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/39228
4. Barr H. CAIPE (2002) Interprofessional Education: Today, Yesterday and Tomorrow. CAIPE - The UK Centre for the Advancement of Interprofessional. Published online 2002:47.
5. Barr Hugh NC. CAIPE-Requirements-Regarding-Interprofessional-Education-and-Practice-A-Comparative-Review-for-Health-and-Social-Care.; 2010.
6. Barr H, Gray R, Helme M, et al. Interprofessional Education Guidelines 2016 prepared for CAIPE. Published online 2016:26.
7. Hammick M. Interprofessional Education: Concept, Theory and Application. http://dx.doi.org/103109/13561829809014123. 1998;12(3):323-332. doi:10.3109/13561829809014123
8. Hammick M, Olckers L, Campion-Smith C. Learning in interprofessional teams: AMEE Guide no 38. Med Teach. 2009;31(1):1-12. doi:10.1080/01421590802585561

9. Onan A, Turan S. Mezuniyet Öncesinde Mesleklerarası Eğitim. Türkiye Klinikleri. 2017;2(2):111-116.
10. Harden RM. AMEE guide no. 12: Multiprofessional education: Part 1 - effective multiprofessional education: A three-dimensional perspective. Med Teach. 1998;20(5):402-408. doi:10.1080/01421599880472
11. World Health Organization. Framework for Action on Interprofessional Education & Collaborative Practice Health Professions Networks Nursing & Midwifery Human Resources for Health.; 2010. Accessed January 31, 2023. http://www.who.int/hrh/nursing_midwifery/en/
12. Şahin H. Meslekler Arası Eğitim Etkinliğinin Değerlendirilmesinde Bilimsel Araştırmalar ve Kanıt. Turkiye Klinikleri Medical Education - Special Topics. 2024;9(1):80-84. (in Turkish)
13. Güvercin CH. Meslekler Arası Eğitim ve Etik Boyutları. Turkiye Klinikleri Medical Education - Special Topics. 2024;9(1):22-28. (in Turkish).
14. Tengiz Fİ. Meslekler Arası Eğitim’de Uygulama Örnekleri ve Sürdürülebilir Yaklaşımlar. Turkiye Klinikleri Medical Education - Special Topics. 2024;9(1):61-66. (in Turkish).
15. Başer A, Şahin H. Exploring the foundations of interprofessional education: Reconnaissance phase of an action research. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası Dergisi. 2025;24(72).
16. Voyce C, Subocz S. Faculty Members’ Perceptions of Organizational Culture and Faculty Members’ Perceptions of Organizational Culture and Implementation of Interprofessional Education (Doctoral Dissertation). Walden University; 2020. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations
17. Oandasan I. Changing organizational culture to embrace interprofessional education and interprofessional practice. Interprofessional client-centred Collaborative Practice. 2015;(December):67-82.
18. Oandasan I, & RSc. Key elements for interprofessional education. Part 1: The learner, the educator and the learning context. J Interprof Care. 2005;19(Suppl 1):23-38.
19. Oandasan I, Reeves S. Key elements of interprofessional education. Part 2: Factors, processes and outcomes. J Interprof Care. 2005;(Suppl 1):39-48. doi:10.1080/13561820500081703
20. Sezer H. Meslekler Arası Eğitim’de Eğitici Gelişim Programlarının Geliştirilmesi. Turkiye Klinikleri Medical Education - Special Topics. 2024;9(1):67-71. (in Turkish)
21. Başer A. İşbirliğinin Gücü: Sağlık Profesyonelleri İçin Senaryo Tabanlı Yaklaşımlar. Turkiye Klinikleri Medical Education - Special Topics. 2024;9(1):48-55. (in Turkish)
22. Reeves S. Community-based interprofessional education for medical, nursing and dental students. Health Soc Care Community. 2000;8(4):269-276. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2524.2000.00251.x
23. Freeth DS, HM, RS, KI, & BH. Effective Interprofessional Education: Development, Delivery, and Evaluation. John Wiley & Sons.; 2008.
24. Çelik G, Sönmez ÖF, Başer A. Enhancing interprofessional education readiness in undergraduate dental students: a scenario-based peer learning programme. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1). doi:10.1186/S12903-024-03878-7
25. Başer A, Şahin H. Coexisting of interprofessional education and organizational culture. Turkish Journal of Biochemistry. 2022;47(1):145-148. doi:10.1515/TJB-2019-0168
26. Barr H, Low H, Gray R. CAIPE (2013) Introducing Interprofessional Education. PO Box 680 Fareham PO14 9NH; 2013.
27. Elçin M. A Simulation-enhanced, Workplace-based Interprofessional Education for Patient Safety: Hacettepe University Undergraduate Experience. Social Innovations Journal. 2020;3. Accessed March 26, 2023. https://socialinnovationsjournal.com/index.php/sij/article/view/442/382
28. Sarmasoğlu Ş, Elçin M, Masiello İ. Experiences About Successful Interprofessional Education Programs: Karolinska Institute Example (Araştırma). Journal of Hacettepe University Faculty of Nursing. 2018;5(1):14-18. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1652-906X
29. Onan A, Simsek N. Interprofessional education and social interaction: The use of automated external defibrillators in team-based basic life support. Health Informatics J. 2019;25(1):139-148. doi:10.1177/1460458217704252
30. Lunde L, Moen A, Jakobsen RB, Rosvold EO, Brænd AM. Exploring healthcare students’ interprofessional teamwork in primary care simulation scenarios: collaboration to create a shared treatment plan. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):1-14. doi:10.1186/S12909-021-02852-Z/FIGURES/1
31. Knapp GM. Trauma Team High-Fidelity Simulation Training in a Rural Level III Trauma Center: An Interprofessional Experience. J Trauma Nurs. 2023;30(2):103-107. doi:10.1097/JTN.0000000000000709
32. Thistlethwaite JE. Values-Based Interprofessional Collaborative Practice_Working Together in Health Care (Values-Based Practice). Cambridge University Press; 2012.
33. Hur HK, Kim KK, Lim YM, Kim J, Park KH, Park YC. Patient safety interprofessional education program using medical error scenarios for undergraduate nursing and medical students in Korea. J Interprof Care. 2023;37(6):944-953. doi:10.1080/13561820.2023.2183184
34. Owusu‐Ansah S, SK, KA, AC, & CN. Pilot study to teach residents about EMS scope of practice through reverse role simulations. Education for Health Journal. 2024;1(37):86-94. doi:https://doi.org/10.62694/efh.2024.29
35. Nguygen LN, Hartmann TC, Harrington DW, Pulford BR. Level Up Your Residency: Can a Novel Two-Week Simulation Rotation Really Make a Difference? Cureus. 2024;16(7). doi:10.7759/CUREUS.64569
36. Grosser J, Bientzle M, Kimmerle J. A Literature Review on the Foundations and Potentials of Digital Teaching Scenarios for Interprofessional Health Care Education. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(10). doi:10.3390/IJERPH17103410
37. Freeth D, Nicol M. Learning clinical skills: an interprofessional approach. Nurse Educ Today. 1998;18(6):455-461. doi:10.1016/S0260-6917(98)80171-8
38. Ko HK, Lin YC, Wang SY, et al. Teaching and learning in interprofessional ethics education: Tutors’ perspectives. Nurs Ethics. 2023;30(1):133-144. doi:10.1177/09697330221122901
39. Matulewicz AT, Lanning SK, Lockeman K, et al. Using a Mixed Methods Approach to Explore Perceptions of Early Learners in Classroom-Based Interprofessional Education Experiences. Published online 2020. doi:10.5688/ajpe7693
40. Thistlethwaite J. Interprofessional education: A review of context, learning and the research agenda. Med Educ. 2012;46(1)(1):58-70. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04143.x.
41. Kanesvaran R, Jingting W, Wahab MT, et al. Toward an Interprofessional Mentoring Program in Palliative Care-A Review of Undergraduate and Postgraduate Mentoring in Medicine, Nursing, Surgery and Social Work Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment View project Famcare View project Toward an Interprofessional Mentoring Program in Palliative Care-A Review of Undergraduate and Postgraduate Mentoring in Medicine, Nursing, Surgery and Social Work. 2016; J Palliat Care Med 6:292. doi: 10.4172/2165-7386.1000292. doi:10.4172/2165-7386.1000292
42. Errington E. Creating learning scenarios: A planning guide for adult educators. Published online 2005. Accessed April 4, 2024. https://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/8586/
43. Seren Smith M., Warnes S., Vanhoestenberghe A. Scenario-based learning. In: Davies JPPN, ed. Teaching and Learning in Higher Education : Perspectives from UCL. UCL IOE Press.; 2018:246.
44. Brewer ML, Barr H. Interprofessional Education and Practice Guide No. 8: Team-based interprofessional practice placements. J Interprof Care. 2016;30(6):747-753. doi:10.1080/13561820.2016.1220930
45. Reime MH, Aarflot M, Kvam FI. Does Interprofessional Scenario-Based Simulation Training Change Attitudes Towards Interprofessional Learning – A Pretest-Posttest Study. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022;15:1527-1532. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S370100
46. Tian Q, Feng R, Bin Z, et al. Iteratively refined ChatGPT outperforms clinical mentors in generating high-quality interprofessional education clinical scenarios: a comparative study. PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square [https://doi.org/1021203/rs3.rs-4637356/v1]. Published online 2024. doi:https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4637356/v1
47. Klemenc-Ketiš Z, Health UZSJ of P, 2024 undefined. Interprofessional education with simulations in primary care. sciendo.comZ Klemenc-Ketiš, U ZafošnikSlovenian Journal of Public Health, 2024•sciendo.com. 2024;63(1):1-4. doi:10.2478/sjph-2024-0001
48. Guraya SY, Barr H. The effectiveness of interprofessional education in healthcare: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2018;34(3):160-165. doi:10.1016/J.KJMS.2017.12.009
49. Pack R, Columbus L, Duncliffe TH, et al. “Maybe I’m not that approachable”: using simulation to elicit team leaders’ perceptions of their role in facilitating speaking up behaviors. Advances in Simulation. 2022;7(1):1-10. doi:10.1186/S41077-022-00227-Y/TABLES/2
50. Rash I, Shi K, Sussel R, et al. Virtual 3D Simulation Technology for Interprofessional Team Training. Simul Gaming. 2024;55(2):281-301. doi:10.1177/10468781231222969/ASSET/78578FAE-4FDF-4476-9371-87972381BD3B/ASSETS/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_10468781231222969-FIG10.JPG
51. Loo J, Muise T, MacDonald JA. Interprofessional Simulation for Nursing and Paramedicine Students: Community Anaphylaxis Management Following Immunization. Nurse Educ.2025; 50(1):p E43-E46. doi:10.1097/NNE.0000000000001724