Assessment Of Knowledge, Attitudes, And Behaviors Regarding Cervical Cancer And Pap Smear Screening Test Among Women Aged 20 And Above

Year 2026, Volume: 3 Issue: 1 , 5 - 9 , 30.04.2026

Burak Resul Çiftçi , Seçil Gunher Arıca , Adem Yağan

https://doi.org/10.62425/jmefm.1739236

https://izlik.org/JA77FD43MJ

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to cervical cancer and Pap smear testing among women aged 20 and above who were registered at the Gaziosmanpaşa Hürriyet Training Family Health Center of Istanbul, Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcıoğlu City Hospital. Additionally, sociodemographic factors influencing these aspects were identified. Materials and Methods: This analytical cross-sectional study, conducted between January and March 2021, included 342 married or divorced women aged 20 years and older. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants, and data were collected using a structured questionnaire assessing sociodemographic characteristics, obstetric and gynecological history, knowledge about cervical cancer and the Pap smear test, as well as screening attitudes and behaviors. The questionnaire was developed on the basis of the Ministry of Health screening programs, resources from the Turkish Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics, and scales used in the literature. The internal consistency of the questionnaire was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, which was found to be 0.81, indicating adequate reliability. Statistical analyses were performed with IBM SPSS Statistics version 21. Student’s t test was used to compare means, and the chi-square test was applied for categorical variables. A P value of <.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Results: The mean age of the participants was 45.19±13.6 years. A total of 91.8% had heard of cervical cancer and had undergone a Pap smear test, and 73.1% had undergone a Pap smear at least once. The main reasons for not having the test were embarrassment, not considering it necessary, and a lack of knowledge. The knowledge level of 71.3% of the women was found to be insufficient. The percentage of women who underwent a Pap smear was significantly greater among women aged 41–60 years, those living in urban areas, widows, and those with a higher educational level (P<.05). Women who received information from healthcare personnel also had higher screening rates. Conclusion: Although most participants were aware of cervical cancer and Pap smear testing, their overall knowledge was inadequate. However, the screening rate was relatively high. These findings highlight the need to expand screening programs and increase awareness among women.

Keywords

Cervical cancer , Pap smear , HPV

Ethical Statement

The study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcıoğlu City Hospital (Approval date: 29/12/2020, Protocol No: 486707771-514.10

References

• World Health Organization. Cervical cancer: key facts. Published 2022. Accessed August 30, 2025. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cervical-cancer
• National Cancer Institute. Cervical cancer: causes, risk factors, and prevention. Published August 2, 2024.
• Yaslı G. Field evaluation of the cervical cancer screening program in Turkey. 2020.
• Lucksom PG. Advantages of liquid-based cytology over conventional Pap smear. In: Advances in HPV Screening Tests for Cervical Cancer. 2021.
• Durmaz S, Özvurmaz Ş, Adana F, et al. Women’s attitudes toward cervical cancer diagnosis. ADÜ Sağ Bil Fak Derg. 2021;5(1):26-36.
• Özdemir E, Yılmaz S. Knowledge and attitudes toward cervical cancer screening. Turk Aile Hekim Derg. 2022;26(3):145-152.
• Özdemir H, Akdemir N. Cervical cancer screening rates and affecting factors. Int J Nurs Stud. 2019;4(1):22-30.
• Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Health. Cancer screening standards in Türkiye. General Directorate of Public Health; 2024.
• Ak ÖB. Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding cancer screening programs. J Health Life Sci. 2024;6(2):77-86.
• Polat, D. (2023). Screening methods in cervical cancer. Journal of Gynecologic Oncology, 26(1), 1-10
• Tekin Y, Arslan E. Barriers to Pap smear screening. Int J Womens Health. 2022;14:789-797.
• Al-Hammadi FA, Al-Hammadi AM, Al-Mansoori KM, et al. Knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding cervical cancer screening. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:1456.
• Shariati-Sarcheshme M, Rahimi F, Karimi M, et al. Barriers and facilitators of cervical cancer screening. BMC Womens Health. 2024.
• Eksi, H., & Yılmaz, B. (2023). Sociodemographic factors affecting cervical cancer screening uptake in Turkey. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 44(3), 312-318.
• Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health. Cervical cancer awareness month announcement. Published 2020.
• Falcaro M, Castañon A, Ndlela B, et al. Effect of HPV vaccination, programme. Lancet.2021;397(10279):1425-1434.
• Arbyn, M., Weiderpass, E., Bruni, L., de Sanjosé, S., Saraiya, M., Ferlay, J., & Bray, F. (2020). Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer: A worldwide analysis. The Lancet Global Health, 8(2), e191– e203
• Hall MT, Simms KT, Lew JB, et al. Impact of HPV vaccination in Australia. Vaccine. 2021;39(36):5125-5133.
• Can G, Eksi H. Urban-rural differences in screening participation. J Cancer Policy. 2022;32:100-108.
• World Health Organization. Global strategy to accelerate the elimination of cervical cancer. WHO; 2020.