A THEORETICAL SUGGESTION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SAFETY CULTURE: CIVIL AVIATION CONTEXT

Abstract

Purpose - This paper aims to place aviation safety culture on three pillars theoretically, and by doing so, to distill findings. By more clear words, It tries to give a more detailed explanation of the concept of safety and safety sciences. Regardless of the business branches, safety should be an important branch, depending on its clear importance in aviation, maritime, health and engineering and more technical sciences to give a clear insight into safety another purpose. Methodology - Methodologically, the differences between the communities of Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft of Tönnies and epistêmê and technê discrimination of Greek philosophy pave the way for Habermas’s Communicative Action Theory to create a cultural form that is exemplified as safety culture in civil aviation depending on the increasing impacts of the communication and communication networks. In the end, it concludes that the safety culture of civil aviation can be explained with this type of theoretical background and this methodology can be utilised in other industrial branches and sciences. Findings- The main findings of this research can be collected in two groups. One of them is directly related to the creation of a cultural form (safety culture) and its main features by theoretical means, the other one is the evaluation of these theoretical means to the specific ends in a specific business branch, so civil aviation. Conclusion- Through these ways, the importance of communication, sociological heritage and knowledge forms in aviation safety culture will be more theoretically understandable which is a complementary recipe of the research gap. On the other side, and in clearer words, safety is one of the great problems of humankind and business life. Like many other concepts such as security, the importance of heritage, culture, transmission and transportation of knowledge will be more understandable with these kinds of papers or works.

Keywords

• Safety culture
• civil aviation
• theoretization
• communication
• knowledge

References

1. Adjekum, D. K. (2014). Safety culture perceptions in a collegiate aviation program: A systematic assessment. Journal of Aviation Technology and Engineering, 3(2), 44-56.
2. Adjekum, D. K., & Tous, M. F. (2020). Assessing the relationship between organizational management factors and resilient safety culture in a collegiate aviation program with Safety Management Systems (SMS). Safety Science, 131, 104909.
3. Alvim da Silva, A. E. F., Pereira, J. R., & Felizardo, L. F. (2022). Science popularization from the perspective of the theory of communicative action. Cultures of Science, 5(1), 50-66.
4. Atak, A., & Kingma, S. (2011). Safety culture in an aircraft maintenance organisation: A view from the inside. Safety Science, 49(2), 268-278.
5. Bates, S. G. (2023). Emotional Intelligence and Safety Culture in Business Aviation. (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).
6. Baxter, H. (1987). System and life-world in Habermas's theory of communicative action. Theory and Society, 39-86.
7. Bennett, K. (2011). Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft: the geopolitics of academic plagiarism. Plagiate-Gefahr fur die Wissenschaft, 53-69.
8. Bhattarai, A., Dhakal, S., Gautam, Y., Bhattarai, N., Jha, B., & Sharma, U. (2022). Perception of safety culture in the Nepalese aviation industry: A factor analysis approach. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 16, 100723.

9. Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., & Janson, M. (1999, December). Communicative action theory: An approach to understanding the application of information systems. In ACIS, Australasian Conference on Information Systems.
10. Chia, R., & Holt, R. (2008). The nature of knowledge in business schools. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7(4), 471-486.
11. Chilton, S., & Wyant Cuzzo, M. S. (2005). Habermas's theory of communicative action as a theoretical framework for mediation practice. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 22(3), 325-348.
12. Christenson, J. A. (1984). Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft: Testing the spatial and communal hypotheses. Social Forces, 63(1), 160-168.
13. Dietz, J. L., & Widdershoven, G. A. (1991, September). Speech acts or communicative actions? In Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work ECSCW’91 (pp. 235-248). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
14. Ek, Å., & Akselsson, R. (2007). Aviation on the ground: Safety culture in a ground handling company. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 17(1), 59-76.
15. Ek, Å., Akselsson, R., Arvidsson, M., & Johansson, C. R. (2007). Safety culture in Swedish air traffic control. Safety Science, 45(7), 791-811.
16. Foster, A. R., & Adjekum, D. K. (2022). A qualitative review of the relationship between safety management systems (SMS) and safety culture in Multiple-Collegiate aviation programs. The Collegiate Aviation Review International, 40(1), 63-78.
17. Gibbons, A. M., von Thaden, T. L., & Wiegmann, D. A. (2006). Development and initial validation of a survey for assessing safety culture within commercial flight operations. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 16(2), 215-238.
18. Gill, G. K., & Shergill, G. S. (2004). Perceptions of safety management and safety culture in the aviation industry in New Zealand. Journal of Air Transport Management, 10(4), 231-237.
19. Glendon, A. I., & Stanton, N. A. (2000). Perspectives on safety culture. Safety science, 34(1-3), 193-214.
20. Greeley, A. M. (1966). After secularity: The neo-Gemeinschaft society: A post-Christian postscript. Sociological Analysis, 27(3), 119-127.
21. Habermas, Jürgen (1987) [1981]. Theory of Communicative Action, Volume Two: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason (Book). Translated by Thomas A. McCarthy. Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-1401-X.
22. Habermas, Jürgen (1984) [1981]. Theory of Communicative Action, Volume One: Reason and the Rationalization of Society (Book). Translated by Thomas A. McCarthy. Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press. ISBN 978-0-8070-1507-0.
23. Hoch, C. J. (2007). Pragmatic communicative action theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26(3), 272-283.
24. Ilan, R., & Fowler, R. (2005). Brief history of patient safety culture and science. Journal of Critical Care, 20(1), 2-5.
25. Karpov, A. (2015). The ancient episteme of activity as ontological horizon of modern education development. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 214, 448-456.
26. Kernstock, J., & Oliver Brexendorf, T. (2009). Implications of Habermas's theory of communicative action for corporate brand management. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 14(4), 389-403.
27. Kihlsrtöm, A., & Israel, J. (2002). Communicative or strategic action–an examination of fundamental issues in the theory of communicative action. International Journal of Social Welfare, 11(3), 210-218.
28. Kornbeck, J. (2001). 'Gemeinschaft'skills versus' Gesellschaft'skills in social work education and practice. Applying To¨ nnies' dichotomy for a model of intercultural communication. Social Work Education, 20(2), 247-261.
29. Lawrenson, A. J., & Braithwaite, G. R. (2018). Regulation or criminalisation: What determines legal standards of safety culture in commercial aviation? Safety Science, 102, 251-262.
30. Le Coze, J. C. (2019). How safety culture can make us think. Safety Science, 118, 221-229.
31. Leonard, P., & Tochia, C. (2022). From episteme to techne: Crafting responsible innovation in trustworthy autonomous systems research practice. Journal of Responsible Technology, 11, 100035.
32. Leonard, P., & Tochia, C. (2022). From episteme to techne: Crafting responsible innovation in trustworthy autonomous systems research practice. Journal of Responsible Technology, 11, 100035.
33. Liao, M. Y. (2015). Safety Culture in commercial aviation: Differences in perspective between Chinese and Western pilots. Safety Science, 79, 193-205.
34. McDonald, N., Corrigan, S., Daly, C., & Cromie, S. (2000). Safety management systems and safety culture in aircraft maintenance organisations. Safety Science, 34(1-3), 151-176.
35. Mearns, K., Kirwan, B., Reader, T. W., Jackson, J., Kennedy, R., & Gordon, R. (2013). Development of a methodology for understanding and enhancing safety culture in Air Traffic Management. Safety science, 53, 123-133.
36. Mitrović, L. R. (1999). New social paradigm: Habermas' Theory of communicative action. FACTA UNIVERSITATIS-Philosophy, Sociology, Psychology and History, 6, 217-223.
37. Nilsson, J., & Hendrikse, G. (2011). Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft in cooperatives. New developments in the theory of networks. Franchising, Alliances and Cooperatives, 11, 339-352.
38. Parker, D., Lawrie, M., & Hudson, P. (2006). A framework for understanding the development of organisational safety culture. Safety Science, 44(6), 551-562.
39. Rawlins, F. I. G. (1950). Episteme and techne. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 10(3), 389-397.
40. Remawi, H., Bates, P., & Dix, I. (2011). The relationship between the implementation of a Safety Management System and the attitudes of employees towards unsafe acts in aviation. Safety Science, 49(5), 625-632.
41. Risse, T. (2004). Global governance and communicative action. Government and Opposition, 39(2), 288-313.
42. Sandstedt, E., & Westin, S. (2015). Beyond gemeinschaft and gesellschaft. Cohousing life in contemporary Sweden. Housing, Theory and Society, 32(2), 131-150.
43. Scares, J. A. (1997). A reformulation of the concept of tradition. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 17(6), 6-21.
44. Thompson, J. B. (1983). Rationality and social rationalization: An assessment of Habermas's theory of communicative action. Sociology, 17(2), 278-294.
45. Tonnies, F., & Harris, J. (2001). Tonnies: Community and civil society. Cambridge University Press.
46. Turan, O., Kurt, R. E., Arslan, V., Silvagni, S., Ducci, M., Liston, P. & Papadakis, G. (2016). Can we learn from aviation: safety enhancements in transport by achieving human orientated resilient shipping environment. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 1669-1678.
47. Waters, T. (2007). Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft societies. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, 2, 1-4.
48. Wilke, S., Majumdar, A., & Ochieng, W. Y. (2014). A framework for assessing the quality of aviation safety databases. Safety Science, 63, 133-145.
49. Yorio, P. L., Edwards, J., & Hoeneveld, D. (2019). Safety culture across cultures. Safety Science, 120, 402-410.