Research Article

COMPARISON OF YOUNG CONSUMERS' BRAND EQUITY PERCEPTIONS FOR TRADITIONAL AND NONTRADITIONAL BRANDS ACROSS VARIOUS PRODUCT CATEGORIES

Volume: 4 Number: 4 December 30, 2017
EN

COMPARISON OF YOUNG CONSUMERS' BRAND EQUITY PERCEPTIONS FOR TRADITIONAL AND NONTRADITIONAL BRANDS ACROSS VARIOUS PRODUCT CATEGORIES

Abstract

Purpose - This study aims to compare consumers' brand perception of traditional and non-traditional brands.

Methodology -  Consumers who live in Ankara constitute the universe of the study. The data were collected using the face-to-face survey method. The questionnaire contains statements measuring brand value of both traditional and non-traditional brands for soup and sport shoes .

Findings- According to the results obtained in the study, brand perceptions of traditional brands were found higher than those of nontraditional brands.

Conclusion- The study revealed  that there was a meaningful difference between consumers' brand perceptions of traditional and nontraditional brands, and that this difference was in favor of traditional brands 

Keywords

References

  1. Aaker, D. 1991, Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name, New York: Free Press.
  2. Aaker, D. 1996, Building Strong Brands, New York: Free Press.
  3. Aaker, D. 2004, “Leveraging the corporate brand”, California Management Review, 46 (3), 6–18.
  4. Alkibay, S. 2002, “Marka Değeri Ve Profesyonel Spor Kulüplerinin Taraftar İlişkileri Yoluyla Marka Değeri Yaratmaları Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, Gazi Üniversitesi Ticaret ve Turizm Eğitim Fakültesi, Bilimsel Araştırma Projesi.
  5. Arjun Chaudhuri, Morris B. Halbrook, 2001, “The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performence: the role of brand loyality”, Journal of Marketing, Vol.65, p.83.
  6. Bearden, W.O, Hardesty, D.M., Rese R.L, 2001, “Consumer self-confidence: refinements in conceptualization and measurement”,Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1) June, p. 121-134
  7. Erdil T. S., Uzun Y.,2009, Marka Olmak, İstanbul, Beta Yayınları.
  8. George, M. 2004, “Heritage branding helps in global markets”, Marketing News, 4 (13), 1.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 30, 2017

Submission Date

August 14, 2017

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2017 Volume: 4 Number: 4

APA
Catli, O., Ermec Sertoglu, A., & Ors, H. (2017). COMPARISON OF YOUNG CONSUMERS’ BRAND EQUITY PERCEPTIONS FOR TRADITIONAL AND NONTRADITIONAL BRANDS ACROSS VARIOUS PRODUCT CATEGORIES. Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics, 4(4), 479-492. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.736
AMA
1.Catli O, Ermec Sertoglu A, Ors H. COMPARISON OF YOUNG CONSUMERS’ BRAND EQUITY PERCEPTIONS FOR TRADITIONAL AND NONTRADITIONAL BRANDS ACROSS VARIOUS PRODUCT CATEGORIES. JMML. 2017;4(4):479-492. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.736
Chicago
Catli, Ozlem, Aysegul Ermec Sertoglu, and Husniye Ors. 2017. “COMPARISON OF YOUNG CONSUMERS’ BRAND EQUITY PERCEPTIONS FOR TRADITIONAL AND NONTRADITIONAL BRANDS ACROSS VARIOUS PRODUCT CATEGORIES”. Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics 4 (4): 479-92. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.736.
EndNote
Catli O, Ermec Sertoglu A, Ors H (December 1, 2017) COMPARISON OF YOUNG CONSUMERS’ BRAND EQUITY PERCEPTIONS FOR TRADITIONAL AND NONTRADITIONAL BRANDS ACROSS VARIOUS PRODUCT CATEGORIES. Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics 4 4 479–492.
IEEE
[1]O. Catli, A. Ermec Sertoglu, and H. Ors, “COMPARISON OF YOUNG CONSUMERS’ BRAND EQUITY PERCEPTIONS FOR TRADITIONAL AND NONTRADITIONAL BRANDS ACROSS VARIOUS PRODUCT CATEGORIES”, JMML, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 479–492, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.736.
ISNAD
Catli, Ozlem - Ermec Sertoglu, Aysegul - Ors, Husniye. “COMPARISON OF YOUNG CONSUMERS’ BRAND EQUITY PERCEPTIONS FOR TRADITIONAL AND NONTRADITIONAL BRANDS ACROSS VARIOUS PRODUCT CATEGORIES”. Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics 4/4 (December 1, 2017): 479-492. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.736.
JAMA
1.Catli O, Ermec Sertoglu A, Ors H. COMPARISON OF YOUNG CONSUMERS’ BRAND EQUITY PERCEPTIONS FOR TRADITIONAL AND NONTRADITIONAL BRANDS ACROSS VARIOUS PRODUCT CATEGORIES. JMML. 2017;4:479–492.
MLA
Catli, Ozlem, et al. “COMPARISON OF YOUNG CONSUMERS’ BRAND EQUITY PERCEPTIONS FOR TRADITIONAL AND NONTRADITIONAL BRANDS ACROSS VARIOUS PRODUCT CATEGORIES”. Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics, vol. 4, no. 4, Dec. 2017, pp. 479-92, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.736.
Vancouver
1.Ozlem Catli, Aysegul Ermec Sertoglu, Husniye Ors. COMPARISON OF YOUNG CONSUMERS’ BRAND EQUITY PERCEPTIONS FOR TRADITIONAL AND NONTRADITIONAL BRANDS ACROSS VARIOUS PRODUCT CATEGORIES. JMML. 2017 Dec. 1;4(4):479-92. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.736

Journal of Management, Marketing and Logistics (JMML) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, semi-annual and open-access online journal. The journal publishes 2 issues a year. The issuing months are June and December. The publication languages of the Journal is English. JMML aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in the areas of management, marketing, logistics, supply chain management, international trade. The editor in chief of JMML invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JMML charges no submission or publication fee.


Ethics Policy - JMML applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JMML is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract).


Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.