COMPARISON OF YOUNG CONSUMERS' BRAND EQUITY PERCEPTIONS FOR TRADITIONAL AND NONTRADITIONAL BRANDS ACROSS VARIOUS PRODUCT CATEGORIES
Abstract
Purpose - This study aims to compare consumers' brand perception of traditional and non-traditional brands.
Methodology - Consumers who live in Ankara constitute the universe of the study. The data were collected using the face-to-face survey method. The questionnaire contains statements measuring brand value of both traditional and non-traditional brands for soup and sport shoes .
Findings- According to the results obtained in the study, brand perceptions of traditional brands were found higher than those of nontraditional brands.
Conclusion- The study revealed that there was a meaningful difference between consumers' brand perceptions of traditional and nontraditional brands, and that this difference was in favor of traditional brands
Keywords
References
- Aaker, D. 1991, Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name, New York: Free Press.
- Aaker, D. 1996, Building Strong Brands, New York: Free Press.
- Aaker, D. 2004, “Leveraging the corporate brand”, California Management Review, 46 (3), 6–18.
- Alkibay, S. 2002, “Marka Değeri Ve Profesyonel Spor Kulüplerinin Taraftar İlişkileri Yoluyla Marka Değeri Yaratmaları Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, Gazi Üniversitesi Ticaret ve Turizm Eğitim Fakültesi, Bilimsel Araştırma Projesi.
- Arjun Chaudhuri, Morris B. Halbrook, 2001, “The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performence: the role of brand loyality”, Journal of Marketing, Vol.65, p.83.
- Bearden, W.O, Hardesty, D.M., Rese R.L, 2001, “Consumer self-confidence: refinements in conceptualization and measurement”,Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1) June, p. 121-134
- Erdil T. S., Uzun Y.,2009, Marka Olmak, İstanbul, Beta Yayınları.
- George, M. 2004, “Heritage branding helps in global markets”, Marketing News, 4 (13), 1.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
December 30, 2017
Submission Date
August 14, 2017
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 2017 Volume: 4 Number: 4