Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2017, Volume: 4 Issue: 4, 456 - 464, 30.12.2017
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.733

Abstract

References

  • Belcombe, K., Fraser,I. ve Harris,L.(2009). “Consumer willingness to pay for in-flight service and comfort levels: A choice experiment”, Journal of Air Transport Management, 15,221-226.
  • Belobaba, P. (2015). “The Global Airline Industry”.Chicester: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Bockelie, A., &Belobaba, P. (2017).“Incorporating ancillary services in airline passenger choice models”.Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 1-16.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2005), “AnketGeliştirme”.Türk Eğitim BilimleriDergisi, Cilt.3, No.2, ss.133-151.
  • Garrow, L. ve Mumbower, S.(2012). “Assessment of product debundling trends in the US airline industry: Customer service and public policy implications”. Transportation Research Part A, 46,255-268.
  • Ideaworks.(2016). 2016 Ancillary Revenue Yearbook.
  • O’Connell, J., & Warnock-Smith, D. (2013).“An investigation into traveler preferences and acceptance levels of airline ancillary revenues”.Journal of Air Transport Management 33, 21-21.
  • O'Connell, J., & Williams, G. (2011).“Air Transport in the 21st Century: Key Strategic Developments”. Ashgate.
  • Peksatıcı, Ö. (2016). “Ancillary revenue opportunities in Turkish domestic aviation market”. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 4(1), 175-206.
  • SITA.(2014). 2014 Airline IT Trends Survey.
  • Sorensen, J., & Lucas, E. (2011).Loyalty by the Billions. www.ideaworkscompany.com: http://www.ideaworkscompany.com/wpcontent/uploads/2012/05/2011LoyaltybytheBillions-report.pdfadresindenalınmıştır.
  • Şengür, Y. ve KuyucakŞengür, F. (2017).“Airlines define their business models”. World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research, 6, 2, 141-153.
  • Vasigh, B., Taleghani, R., and Jenkins, D. (2012), “Aircraft Finance: Strategies for Managing Capital Costs in a Turbulent Industry”, J. Ross Publishing, Ft. Lauderdale, FL.
  • Wit, J. ve Zuidberg, J. (2012).“The growth limits of the low cost carrier model”, Journal of Air Transport Management, 21, 17-23.
  • Wittmer, A. ve Rowley, E. (2014).“Customer value of purchasable supplementary services: The case of a European full network carrier's economy class”, Journal of Air Transport Management, 34, 17-23.

A RESEARCH ON ANCILLARY PRODUCT BUYING INTENTIONS OF DOMESTIC AIRLINE PASSENGERS IN TURKEY

Year 2017, Volume: 4 Issue: 4, 456 - 464, 30.12.2017
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.733

Abstract

Purpose-In this
study, the purchase intentions of Turkish domestic passengers in respect of
ancillary products was determined.

Methodology-For this purpose a quantitative study was performed. A
survey based on the literatüre review and past studies was developed and used
for data collection. Data has been analyzed using Statistical Package for the
Social Sciences (SPSS).

Findings-According to the results, the tendency of buying ancillary
products forTurkish domestic passengers was found low. Moreover, there was not
found any statistical relationship between demografic characteristics of
passengers and the intention of passengers buying airlines’ ancillary
products.  

Conclusion-In the current market, airline passengers in Turkey
domestic market are not willingto buy airline ancillary products with an extra
costs, however, reasonable prices might trigger the buying behaviour.  

References

  • Belcombe, K., Fraser,I. ve Harris,L.(2009). “Consumer willingness to pay for in-flight service and comfort levels: A choice experiment”, Journal of Air Transport Management, 15,221-226.
  • Belobaba, P. (2015). “The Global Airline Industry”.Chicester: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Bockelie, A., &Belobaba, P. (2017).“Incorporating ancillary services in airline passenger choice models”.Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 1-16.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2005), “AnketGeliştirme”.Türk Eğitim BilimleriDergisi, Cilt.3, No.2, ss.133-151.
  • Garrow, L. ve Mumbower, S.(2012). “Assessment of product debundling trends in the US airline industry: Customer service and public policy implications”. Transportation Research Part A, 46,255-268.
  • Ideaworks.(2016). 2016 Ancillary Revenue Yearbook.
  • O’Connell, J., & Warnock-Smith, D. (2013).“An investigation into traveler preferences and acceptance levels of airline ancillary revenues”.Journal of Air Transport Management 33, 21-21.
  • O'Connell, J., & Williams, G. (2011).“Air Transport in the 21st Century: Key Strategic Developments”. Ashgate.
  • Peksatıcı, Ö. (2016). “Ancillary revenue opportunities in Turkish domestic aviation market”. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 4(1), 175-206.
  • SITA.(2014). 2014 Airline IT Trends Survey.
  • Sorensen, J., & Lucas, E. (2011).Loyalty by the Billions. www.ideaworkscompany.com: http://www.ideaworkscompany.com/wpcontent/uploads/2012/05/2011LoyaltybytheBillions-report.pdfadresindenalınmıştır.
  • Şengür, Y. ve KuyucakŞengür, F. (2017).“Airlines define their business models”. World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research, 6, 2, 141-153.
  • Vasigh, B., Taleghani, R., and Jenkins, D. (2012), “Aircraft Finance: Strategies for Managing Capital Costs in a Turbulent Industry”, J. Ross Publishing, Ft. Lauderdale, FL.
  • Wit, J. ve Zuidberg, J. (2012).“The growth limits of the low cost carrier model”, Journal of Air Transport Management, 21, 17-23.
  • Wittmer, A. ve Rowley, E. (2014).“Customer value of purchasable supplementary services: The case of a European full network carrier's economy class”, Journal of Air Transport Management, 34, 17-23.
There are 15 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Articles
Authors

Ferhan Kuyucak Sengur

Temel Caner Ustaomer

Mustafa Uzgor

Publication Date December 30, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017 Volume: 4 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Kuyucak Sengur, F., Ustaomer, T. C., & Uzgor, M. (2017). A RESEARCH ON ANCILLARY PRODUCT BUYING INTENTIONS OF DOMESTIC AIRLINE PASSENGERS IN TURKEY. Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics, 4(4), 456-464. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.733

Journal of Management, Marketing and Logistics (JMML) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages of the Journal are English and Turkish. JMML aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in the areas of management, marketing, logistics, supply chain management, international trade. The editor in chief of JMML invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JMML charges no submission or publication fee.


Ethics Policy - JMML applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JMML is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).


Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.