Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

THE FACTORS AFFECTING THE SEA TRANSPORTATION IN THE NEW GLOBALIZATION ERA

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 3, 166 - 171, 30.09.2018

Soner Esmer

Öz

Purpose- to identify the variables
that define the new globalization model from the point of view of the container
shipping and port industry and to rank these variables by their importance.

Methodology-
A research process involving both
qualitative (semi-structured interview) and quantitative method (Fuzzy AHP) has
used to collect and analyse data.

Findings- According to the findings, there are 9 basic variables
that will affect maritime transport and the port in the future.







Conclusion- the most influential variables of the new
globalization model that will affect the maritime transport in the future will
be cybersecurity threat, Industry 4.0 technologies and climate change.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sea transport globalization cybersecurity industry 4.0 climate change

Kaynakça

  • Abdel-Kader, M., Dugdale, D. (2001). Evaluating investments in advanced manufacturing technology: a fuzzy set theory approach. British Accounting Review, 33, 455-489.
  • Aggelakakis, J., Bernandino, M., Boile, P., Christidis, A., Condeco, M., Krail, A., Papanikolaou, M., Reichenbach. J. (2015). The future of the transport industry. European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Prospective Technological Studies.
  • Baas, S. M., Kwakernaak, H. (1977). Rating and ranking of multiple aspect alternatives using fuzzy sets. Automatica, 13, 47-58.
  • Bernardino, J., Vieira, J., Garcia, H. (2013). Factors of evolution of demand and methodological approach to identify pathways. FUTURE Deliverable D3.1. Project financed by the 7th Framework Programme.
  • Bhattacharya, A., Khanna, D., Schweizer, C., Bijapurkar, A. (2017). The new globalization: going beyond the rhetoric. Boston Consulting.
  • Boddy, C. R. (2016). Sample size for qualitative research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 19(4), 426–432.
  • Bortolan, G., Degani, R. (1985). A review of some methods for ranking fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 15, 1-19.
  • Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods. Oxford university press, 4th edition.
  • BSI. (2016) the British Standards Institution report. https://www.bsigroup.com/Documents/about-bsi/financial-performance/2016/BSI-Annual-report-and-financial-statements-2016.pdf
  • Chang, D. Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), 649-655.
  • Chen, S. J., Hwang, C. L. (1992). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making methods. In: Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 375. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, 14(4), 532–550.
  • Ezzati, R., Allahvıranloo, T., Khezerloo, S., Khezerloo, M. (2012). An approach for ranking of fuzzy numbers. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 690-695.
  • H. Deng, (1999). Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparison. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 21, 215-231.
  • Jain, R. (1976). Decision making in the presence of fuzzy variable. IEEE Trans Systems Man and Cybernet SMC, 6, pp. 698-703.
  • Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.
  • Kwong, C. K., Bai, H. (2003). Determining the importance weights for the customer requirements in QFD using a fuzzy AHP with an extent analysis approach. IEE Transactions, 35(7), 619-626.
  • Liou, T. S., Wang, M. J. (1992). Ranking fuzzy numbers with integral value. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 50(3), 247-255.
  • Malhotra, N. K. (2008). Marketing research: an applied orientation, 5/e, Pearson Education India.
  • OECD/ITF (2017). ITF transport outlook 2017, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789282108000-en
  • Rodrigue, J. P. (2006). Transportation and globalization. Encyclopaedia of Globalization, Edited by Roland Robertson and Jan Aart Scholte. Routledge.
  • Rodrigue, J. P. (2010). Maritime transportation: drivers for the shipping and port industries. International Transport Forum, Paris.
  • Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International journal of services sciences, 1(1), 83–98.
  • Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of mathematical psychology, 15(3), 234–281.
  • Saxon, S., Stone, S. (2017). Container shipping, the next 50 years. McKinsey&Company. Travel, Transport & Logistics.
  • Sheu, J. B. (2004). A hybrid fuzzy-based approach for identifying global logistics strategies. Transportation Research, 40(1), 39-61.
  • Tavasszy, L. A., Ruijgrok, C. J., Thissen, M. J. P. M. (2003). Emerging global logistics networks: implications for transport systems and policies. Growth and Change 34(4), 456–472.
  • Tyson, L. D., Lund, S. (2017). Globalization isn't in retreat. It's just gone digital. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/02/why-globalization-isnt-it-in-retreat-its-gone-digital
  • Vaidya, O. S., Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. European Journal of operational research, 169(1), 1–29.
  • Wienberg, C. (2017). Maersk says June cyberattack will cost it up to $300 million. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-08-16/maersk-misses-estimates-as-cyberattack-set-to-hurt-third-quarter
  • Wilson, A. (2011) Marketing research: an integrated approach. FT Prentice Hall.
  • Yu, C. S. (2002). A GP-AHP method for solving group decision-making fuzzy AHP problems. Computers & Operations Research, 29(14), 1969-2001.
  • Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338- 353.

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 3, 166 - 171, 30.09.2018

Soner Esmer

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Abdel-Kader, M., Dugdale, D. (2001). Evaluating investments in advanced manufacturing technology: a fuzzy set theory approach. British Accounting Review, 33, 455-489.
  • Aggelakakis, J., Bernandino, M., Boile, P., Christidis, A., Condeco, M., Krail, A., Papanikolaou, M., Reichenbach. J. (2015). The future of the transport industry. European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Prospective Technological Studies.
  • Baas, S. M., Kwakernaak, H. (1977). Rating and ranking of multiple aspect alternatives using fuzzy sets. Automatica, 13, 47-58.
  • Bernardino, J., Vieira, J., Garcia, H. (2013). Factors of evolution of demand and methodological approach to identify pathways. FUTURE Deliverable D3.1. Project financed by the 7th Framework Programme.
  • Bhattacharya, A., Khanna, D., Schweizer, C., Bijapurkar, A. (2017). The new globalization: going beyond the rhetoric. Boston Consulting.
  • Boddy, C. R. (2016). Sample size for qualitative research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 19(4), 426–432.
  • Bortolan, G., Degani, R. (1985). A review of some methods for ranking fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 15, 1-19.
  • Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods. Oxford university press, 4th edition.
  • BSI. (2016) the British Standards Institution report. https://www.bsigroup.com/Documents/about-bsi/financial-performance/2016/BSI-Annual-report-and-financial-statements-2016.pdf
  • Chang, D. Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), 649-655.
  • Chen, S. J., Hwang, C. L. (1992). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making methods. In: Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 375. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, 14(4), 532–550.
  • Ezzati, R., Allahvıranloo, T., Khezerloo, S., Khezerloo, M. (2012). An approach for ranking of fuzzy numbers. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 690-695.
  • H. Deng, (1999). Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparison. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 21, 215-231.
  • Jain, R. (1976). Decision making in the presence of fuzzy variable. IEEE Trans Systems Man and Cybernet SMC, 6, pp. 698-703.
  • Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.
  • Kwong, C. K., Bai, H. (2003). Determining the importance weights for the customer requirements in QFD using a fuzzy AHP with an extent analysis approach. IEE Transactions, 35(7), 619-626.
  • Liou, T. S., Wang, M. J. (1992). Ranking fuzzy numbers with integral value. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 50(3), 247-255.
  • Malhotra, N. K. (2008). Marketing research: an applied orientation, 5/e, Pearson Education India.
  • OECD/ITF (2017). ITF transport outlook 2017, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789282108000-en
  • Rodrigue, J. P. (2006). Transportation and globalization. Encyclopaedia of Globalization, Edited by Roland Robertson and Jan Aart Scholte. Routledge.
  • Rodrigue, J. P. (2010). Maritime transportation: drivers for the shipping and port industries. International Transport Forum, Paris.
  • Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International journal of services sciences, 1(1), 83–98.
  • Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of mathematical psychology, 15(3), 234–281.
  • Saxon, S., Stone, S. (2017). Container shipping, the next 50 years. McKinsey&Company. Travel, Transport & Logistics.
  • Sheu, J. B. (2004). A hybrid fuzzy-based approach for identifying global logistics strategies. Transportation Research, 40(1), 39-61.
  • Tavasszy, L. A., Ruijgrok, C. J., Thissen, M. J. P. M. (2003). Emerging global logistics networks: implications for transport systems and policies. Growth and Change 34(4), 456–472.
  • Tyson, L. D., Lund, S. (2017). Globalization isn't in retreat. It's just gone digital. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/02/why-globalization-isnt-it-in-retreat-its-gone-digital
  • Vaidya, O. S., Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. European Journal of operational research, 169(1), 1–29.
  • Wienberg, C. (2017). Maersk says June cyberattack will cost it up to $300 million. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-08-16/maersk-misses-estimates-as-cyberattack-set-to-hurt-third-quarter
  • Wilson, A. (2011) Marketing research: an integrated approach. FT Prentice Hall.
  • Yu, C. S. (2002). A GP-AHP method for solving group decision-making fuzzy AHP problems. Computers & Operations Research, 29(14), 1969-2001.
  • Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338- 353.
Toplam 33 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Articles
Yazarlar

Soner Esmer Bu kişi benim 0000-0002-0614-7818

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Eylül 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2018 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA Esmer, S. (2018). THE FACTORS AFFECTING THE SEA TRANSPORTATION IN THE NEW GLOBALIZATION ERA. Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics, 5(3), 166-171.

Journal of Management, Marketing and Logistics (JMML) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages of the Journal are English and Turkish. JMML aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in the areas of management, marketing, logistics, supply chain management, international trade. The editor in chief of JMML invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JMML charges no submission or publication fee.


Ethics Policy - JMML applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JMML is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).


Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.